If you are in your yard, for example, waving around a gun and threatening to shoot people, you'll be lucky if the worst thing that happens is your gun getting taken.
Law is complex, clear and present dangers/public good do matter. If you are in the act of committing a crime, you get busted, they don't go get a warrant first, LOL.
I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That's the excuse they're using right now to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't they use that excuse on 2nd amendment rights?
If you are in your yard, for example, waving around a gun and threatening to shoot people, you'll be lucky if the worst thing that happens is your gun getting taken. Law is complex, clear and present dangers/public good do matter. If you are in the act of committing a crime, you get busted, they don't go get a warrant first, LOL.
I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That's the excuse they're using right now to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't they use that excuse on 2nd amendment rights?