3741
TRUTH! (media.patriots.win)             MAGA            
posted ago by SteelWolf87 ago by SteelWolf87 +3741 / -0
Comments (89)
sorted by:
118
Brownwaterboys 118 points ago +118 / -0

and without leftist we would have all these things. Think of how advanced we'd be if we didnt have leftist, socialist, commies etc. We'd probably be close to 50-100 years ahead in technology.

84
hiddensfinger 84 points ago +84 / -0

Imagine not sending all the money to other places.

48
HunterBidenJR 48 points ago +48 / -0

Hold on now, we don't have to send money to 3rd world shitholes?

40
Judicator 40 points ago +40 / -0

The last few steps people may still be missing are that it doesn't go to the 3rd world, it goes to their leaders and their companies, and most of it then goes right back to the people passing that legislation. Suddenly, you've got our government getting money from taxpayers to give to it's own puppets who give it back, without a dime of it reaching the people in any country.

25
Ponysoldierpatriot 25 points ago +25 / -0

Spot On. Foreign Aide is a way for Dems to lauder money. They send it oversees where it is not tracked, then the foreign government takes there cut and give the rest back to “The Big Guy” or Congressman. This is not unique to the Dems, the Republicans are guilty of doing the same thing with Dept of Defense Contractors. They take us to war, award big contracts to there buddys and in return they get campaign contributions and cush consulting gigs after they retire. The whole system is corrupt.

11
ClownTamer 11 points ago +11 / -0

Dick Cheney did that during the Iraq war. Republicans and Democrats are the same thing, normal people just happened to hijack the Republican party in small numbers.

5
Mooksayshigh 5 points ago +5 / -0

With all the foreign aid we send ALONE the world should be a hid damn utopia, imagine if all the powerful countries actually helped anyone besides its own government.

9
StartAgain 9 points ago +9 / -0

I agree

9
Edial 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's the sad part to me. They think they're the ones working towards a utopia, but in actuality all they would achieve is snuffing out humanity's future and potential forever.

4
VoidWanderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

They know that they would be creating misery, they just don't care. The only thing they care about is what they get out of it, and everyone and everything else can burn as long as they get "theirs".

They are so shortsighted they miss that they'll be burned right along with us.

6
IamM 6 points ago +11 / -5

Oh, you're way off. If we include the whole library of alexandria thing, we'd be so far ahead that the entire concept of "time" would be controllable like checking your email or driving. That 1,000 year head start would, while putting the earth on a much shorter clock, give us so many technological advancements that there'd be human colonies on nearly every planet in the neighboring solar systems.

6
ObviatingTyranny 6 points ago +6 / -0

There was almost nothing of unique value lost in Alexandria. It was a library like any city's library at the time, and most of what they had was copies or had copies made.

There was no technological setback from the fire, that's Historical myth.

5
IamM 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, you're slightly off by that. While there were copies, at the time it was the single biggest collection of knowledge on the planet. It getting destroyed would be the equivalent of if humans had to rebuild the entire internet from scratch today including re-setting the underwater cables and rebuilding all of the individual servers.

2
ObviatingTyranny 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was the biggest collection, but very little in there was unique. History Myth that it set humanity back. It was the equivalent of one server farm being destroyed, and they had to restore the offsite backup. The Mongol hordes set humanity back. The fire at Alexandria did not.

The Alexandria fire myth is only about 300 years old and was popularized by Carl Sagan, that fucking cunt, of all people.

Here's a semi-complete explanation that's mostly rational and accurate. https://historyforatheists.com/2017/07/the-destruction-of-the-great-library-of-alexandria/

3
MapleBaconWaffles 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are we sure that was communists?

-5
IamM -5 points ago +1 / -6

If I remember correctly it was burned down by the romans, who at the time were the equivalent of today's communists. Despite the roman empire being one of the biggest civilizations of all time, many of their decisions involved either burning down cities for no reason or beheading women in front of their children. Add in their stances on slavery/wealth (many roman leaders pictured eating grapes while draped in silk and having literal slaves fanning them), and they're communist to a tee.

5
PlanTruster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rome was a feudal empire, very different from communism

1
CelesteD 1 point ago +2 / -1

there'd be human colonies on nearly every planet in the neighboring solar systems.

who says there isn't? :p

we just aren't of the two tiered society that gets to know/and or live there.

2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftist elites live on uranus. Change my mind.

1
CelesteD 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't live on my anus, thats for sure.

Change your underwear :p

2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only because you are over 18.

1
CelesteD 1 point ago +1 / -0

ha ha ha! so true.

3
centispide 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup, we'd probably be far past needing oil, yet they claim it is capitalists holding us back. Look at Venezuela. They are more reliant on their natural resources than ever just to get enough bread for the lines.

26
somedaygurl 26 points ago +26 / -0

I think it is more than 95%. More like 99.5%

9
RedditIs4Retards 9 points ago +9 / -0

The remaining .5% are lefties posing as the right.

2
Brucesky420 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't even get a straight answer out of these people for what the difference is between a regular ol' conservative and an alt-righter. Because conservative = alt-right now. It's actually insane.

If you don't believe me, go to reddit and ask them what conservative talking head you can listen to without being called alt-right. They either ignore you, or say a liberal journalist who isn't even close to being conservative.

21
RedditIsCommunist 21 points ago +21 / -0

Academia and the press are the ones who have gotten increasingly more extreme. They’re the ones who are getting dangerously extreme.

I’m the same as I was 15 years ago when it comes to almost everything. Back then I’d be very close to the center. I’m other words I’m totally normal and average for 15 years or so ago.

Now academia and the press have gotten so extreme left that I’m getting censored for nothing and they’re denouncing half the population as “white supremacist terrorists” just for rejecting their far left extreme ideology while at the same time supporting violent rioters.

I’m sticking to the bill of rights and rejecting the authoritarian extremism that is increasingly getting violently and intolerantly worse in academia and the press.

3
grndmrshlgando 3 points ago +3 / -0

Theyre trying to provoke a reaction. drone striking Americans on their own soil is pure fantasy, amd if that did happen the backlash would be so brutal it would doubtlessly cause infighting in the military. theyre trying to get people to retaliate with trash talk because they want to push the narrative that conservatives are evil and must be destroyed.

and if they can't get a reaction then they'll false flag a shooting or something because that's what these people do. the country will not survive shit like this and something has to be done.

2
RedditIsCommunist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea, where the regime leadership really got extreme was when they started pushing the idea that somewhere between half the population and at least 80M people were some sort of fringe group like neo-Nazis (Biden with the “white supremacist terrorists” comment) suggesting that they all needed to be completely deplatformed, censored, isolated from the economic system, etc.

That’s very extreme authoritarian stuff.

2
FabsMagicHat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hell I’d say in a lot of ways I’ve moved more left than I used to be, at least on some social issues. I used to be anti-gay marriage and anti-marijuana but now I don’t care what people do in their private time as long as it doesn’t affect people in a harmful way and they don’t force it on me.

2
BillionsAndBillions 2 points ago +2 / -0

Average people rejecting God and moving farther left is how we got into this position in the first place. We continue the slide, so we continue our descent in to oblivion. At least we are all tolerant now.

13
TexasPiper 13 points ago +13 / -0

What’s sad is this life is practically unobtainable now.

6
Thiswillbeintheexam 6 points ago +6 / -0

I dunno, if you work really hard from the outset, don't fall into any of the traps, marry young to a decent and faithful woman, then you might just be able to afford a house in the burbs before she's infertile. You might get one, maybe two white children.

Just ignore the fact that Ahmad and DuShawn over there are having 8-10 kids on welfare.

2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also just ignore the fact that you have a 60% chance of a divorce, with that chance repeated every year, with a (depending on the study and data pulled) 70-80% chance that it's initiated by her. It doesn't matter if she says and pretends to be "decent and faithful", the numbers out there show that the majority of women are not.

Just one more thing that the bolsheviks set up and pushed, and has played out to their intended purpose.

1
ManyDirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then don't marry an American chick. I married a girl who was originally from Brazil. She doesn't have the feminist mindrot.

2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "mindrot" isn't the problem, since all women have "feminism" baked in as it's in their nature. The problem is you brought one back to this shitshow. If you want a "traditional" woman to remain traditional you don't take her out of the culture keeping her in check to a culture that intentionally allows it to be free.

You're gonna get hit with the same bullshit, it's just going to take a little longer unless you plan on keeping her chained to the kitchen and not allow her to talk to any other women.

1
ManyDirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think she's not going to fall for it. Feminism is pretty far out there now. Plus she's pretty pissed that we'll spend years doing immigration paperwork for her to become a citizen and now biden is wanting to give the illegals citizenship straight away.

1
VoidWanderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you were willing to gamble, all I can say is "good luck." I gambled several times and realized it's not a good idea before I lost everything, but you have fun.

5
CoolWineDad 5 points ago +5 / -0

Boomers keep telling me to "work harder" when entry level jobs all demand 5 years of experience and white men are at the bottom of the pile for selection. Yeah I'll just keep "working harder." Never thought I would be saying this but it seems easier to find work in an "unfree" second world country where your skills as an English speaker and qualifications are valued.

2
BillionsAndBillions 2 points ago +2 / -0

The trades is where it's at for white men now. Nobody is going to be checking your privilege scores when their toilet is overflowing or their furnace won't start.

12
swutalk 12 points ago +12 / -0

FUCKING RACIST!

2
somethinga9230k 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do hope people will reflect on these things a bit. "[...] & be left alone" from the OP's image ... what if there are groups that cooperate to seek to enslave, exterminate and make you and your kind extinct? If a few of those among your kind fight these groups for your kind's sake, but the others do not help them (or worse), how will you and your kind fare?

Do you not have a duty and a survival interest in fighting, including looking into things in depth among other aspects? What are the consequences if many or even most do not uphold these fundamental duties?

Then there are those that directly argue against this, and I cannot help but wonder if some or most of those that argue against this are shills seeking to be controlled opposition. For this way, as controlled opposition that discourages any kind of way, method and system that could be effective reg. fighting back, they can seek to weaken the opposition and their targets for enslavement and extinction as much as possible. Removing, undermining, subverting, etc. the 2nd amendment is far from the only part of aspects that they seek to remove defenses reg.

I also cannot help but fear if this forum has been infiltrated deeply. It has been deeply infiltrated among users for a long time now (it is far from all shills that are entirely obvious). But has it also been deeply infiltrated among moderators and others? I am not at all certain about this.

2
swutalk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude. I am being Sarcastic. How can you not see that.

1
somethinga9230k 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know, and you were very clear reg. it, but it is more generally reg. the OP and the bit I point out. As far as I can tell and what I argue for, there is an issue reg. the statement in the image of the OP, though it is of course not at all what leftists like to say, shout or scream.

8
I_Love_45-70_Gov 8 points ago +8 / -0

99.9%

5
diCenturion 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey that looks like a really familiar number. Wouldn’t happen to be the survival rate of the latest pandemic, would it?

3
UpTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also Trump's popular vote percentage

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
Kekistan_United 8 points ago +8 / -0

MAGA terrorists -MSM/libtards

7
EddieFelson8 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly, they cant compete on an argumentative basis so they have to vilify us to look justified when rob us of our earnings and hold our children back because of their skin.

6
ak83 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is legit. If i can sum my stance up it's basically leave me and my family the fuck alone.

They can't tho. Liberals tend to want to dictate everything you do in life to their own beliefs and DEMAND you do it. Personally, Im tired of takimg the high road with this shit. It is very apparent that we have to be forceful is telling them to fuck off and theyre stupid. Publicly shaming them for being so fucking dumb. Maybe a taste of their own medicine is the cure for their stupidity

1
boombaby 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is very apparent that we have to be forceful is telling them to fuck off and they're stupid. Publicly shaming them for being so fucking dumb. Maybe a taste of their own medicine is the cure for their stupidity

Agree completely. Simply asking to be left alone and our tendency to "stay out of it" is what got us here. We can't stay out of it anymore, at least for a while. Not until the left ideologies are considered shameful and pathetic and no one wants to be associated with them. We've never had numbers like we do right now - we might not get another chance.

If they try this stuff and the 95% just tell them they're stupid, publicly, they'll shut up. Cancelling goes both ways.

4
Hanging_Chad 4 points ago +4 / -0

it's actually 97.1%, but close enough

4
HeavyVetting 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's unfortunate that so many people have been brainwashed into thinking anyone right of Mao is literally Hitler, every day it becomes harder to deescalate from this.

3
Groundpounder 3 points ago +3 / -0

Clearly the designs of white supremacist terrorist. FBI... helllppppp!!! 😭

3
diamondsword 3 points ago +3 / -0

Far right= Any right winger who isn't like a Romney or McCain

2
happyfave 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd guess the number is higher than that

2
JZSquared 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know, "entitled."

2
ExileOnRedditStreet 2 points ago +2 / -0

"privileged"

2
Mary911 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't worry. It looks like the Left have given themselves enough rope to HOPEFULLY hang themselves. Then our Law enforcement/military can go in and swoop them up. Like the journalist Pearson Sharp on OAN said that if Biden was the REAL winner of the election, there wouldn't be fencing around him. That alone proves their GUILT.

0
undercoverincali 0 points ago +1 / -1

Cope harder.

2
SteersBeersandQueers 2 points ago +2 / -0

exactly, well said Kyle!

2
Tintop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wanting to live in a neighborhood that is safe for your kids with good schools and low taxes makes you a white supremist.

Even though you don't care what color your neighbors are.

2
AUS4MAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is basically most humans on the planet. Governments ought to capitalise on the fact that we want them to do very little, because everything they do destroys whatever they touch.

The best thing for everyone involved is if they just sit in their chambers every day and shout at each other to no effect.

2
operatorstorm712 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep.

2
diCenturion 2 points ago +2 / -0

And own an unlimited number of guns :)

2
grndmrshlgando 2 points ago +2 / -0

Making it hard to live my life. I just wanted to be left the fuck alone, but here we are.

2
Leporidae 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deboooonked. In reality its over 99%.

2
spaceforce_maganaut 2 points ago +2 / -0

Umm... It's more like 99.999995%

2
hazelknut 2 points ago +2 / -0

true, not new. somebody else (maybe rand paul, not sure) said this about 2 weeks ago. just saying.

2
lurker10001111 2 points ago +2 / -0

keeping your money, giving your kids an education, and individual ownership of property goes against the NWO/CCP/and socialist narrative.

1
Seatacjoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

My wife is in tears daily, fighting with the school and making sure our kids are excused when they have their SEL classes or satanic sex Ed shit tryin to tell my kids about anal sex. Fuckers

1
potato4dawin 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's too bad those 95% don't realize that the only way to return to such a lifestyle in this day and age is extremism.

"oh hey guys, Senator Paul Boyer didn't do what he said he was going to do even though we sent him a lot of sternly worded phone calls. Who could have possibly guessed that would happen?" 🙄🙄🙄

1
BoughtByBloomberg2 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's also the weakness the left exploits. The left will look for a victim to use for their purpose. The right will ask the activist to fuck off before the gun has to come out.

1
GeoG85 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha! Next you're gonna tell me, you want to make love to your wife in the missionary position.

Buncha homos.

1
MapleBaconWaffles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably more like 98%, but whatever.

1
substantialmajestic 1 point ago +1 / -0

The left is free to create their utopia on their own. If it's as grand as they say it will be, people will be clamoring to get in. They don't need to destroy us in order to build that. So leave us alone and get to it!

1
AuPhalanx 1 point ago +1 / -0

95%? I'd say damn-near 100%!

1
ManyDirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other 5% is composed mostly of people who just want to repeal the NFA. I want my goddamn machine gun.

1
BattleKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

This "I just want to be left alone" mentality is pathetic. First of all, it's mostly whiny victimhood like complaining and rarely coupled with a desire to fight for it like hell. Second, instead of the desire to be left alone, one should strive to preserve and create. As a country, community, family, team, whatever it might be. Fighting night and day for our values, and glorifying them with your own creations.

1
-t-h-e-t-r-u-t-h- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Confirmed

1
WhiteTrashJesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

All you have to do to be far right extremist racist is not be a commie

1
uiopy1 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's right. In America, every man a king.