...or as a matter of consequence, it is not for us to deny them the answer to their pathological ultimatum. I know this might seem complicated, or predicated on the belief in God, but it's not. Visualize. If there is an "undefinable" in your "neighborhood," or your world that is, by definition, undefinable and you make an ultimatum about it, then the position is either true or false. If you're wise, you could realize this is effectively "testing God." What this results in is not the forcing of "God's" hand, but of the success or failure of the position that makes the ultimatum. So, the left is in an existential sink or swim position.
This last happened with the nazis. In what they designed of themselves, a reckoning became an absolute - either they win or whatever is outside of them wins.
What you're talking about, from what I can make of it, is just the reactionary (those who want to return to an old status quo), conservative (those who want to conserve the current status quo), and progressive (those who want a new status quo) spectrum.
Completely disagree. The left is effectively inverting the intention of the Bill of Rights. That is not about preserving any status quo, or advancing progress. I think any notion of a spectrum outside of liberty and collectivism, which is what I'm saying, is predicated on wealth, and I say this is an illusion. I know you might say justice and economics is biased from wealth, but think about something. What if Trump was still president? What if we had another conservative after him, and another? Would those divides still exist problematically? I say no.
I am an atheist, I support gay marriage, limited abortion rights and even decriminalization of organic drugs . this is because I believe that the rights that protect me protect everyone. The left is just evil now. no two ways about it. 6' 3" womens wrestlers, abortions at 39 weeks and legalizing crystal meth do nothing but harm. Most of my friends wont talk to me because I don't hate loud enough.
I think that resolving what the left is about is not about belief in God (whether right or left, and why this makes it probably difficult for people to accept or understand), but it does require understanding what God is to humanity. It's like I said, it's not about what you believe in particular, but that they are taking a stand on this unknown yet unsquashable theme. The left taking a stance on squashing it forces, how I put it, a reckoning. And I realize they try to contrive that they are representative of both belief and unbelief, but ultimately, it's all the same, since their moral authority is based on themselves. The culmination of their advances is ALL based on moral authority coming from the collective, which is the elimination of god in society - therefore, I say they are a movement for godlessness, objectively. So, we have to be discerning. And I say, even if you don't believe, you should still be able to detect this. The Bill of Rights is predicated on a reference point, God. The functional utility of this is of absolute importance to America, for any free country, in fact. It's the only way we can have a system that strives towards equal justice, and a balanced peace. Don't think I'm trying to have it all my way. The Bill of Rights forces me to compromise on some of my ideology as well. The problem is the left thinking they will take over, in the same way the nazis were about. Of course, liberals are unsoldiered and weak, so they persist upon other means and methods.. I guess you can say I'm deconstructing the metaphysics of this situation and trying to see it more threadbare. I'm only sharing that finding.