46
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
CertainlyNotEdward 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, we know what's truth insofar as to what is fake and what is not from Donald Trump.

  • Random Twitter profiles purporting to be Trump: completely fake.
  • Gab posts under his official account: unlikely to be fake.
  • Official press releases from Mar a Lago: not fake.
1
Starbright5 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who says Twitter accounts can’t be used as a “character” to shed light when/where needed. Characters are used to capture the attention of different people in the audience... You can’t prove Trump isn’t behind it either... We’re not supposed to know the truth until the ending. All interpretation. Enjoy the show. Everyone is attracted to different types of information for a reason

1
CertainlyNotEdward 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because that would be an inefficient use of his time and money and he didn't become a billionaire making decisions like that.

It's narcissistic to think that Trump is giving you a show via Twitter accounts that under 10,000 people will ever see.

1
Starbright5 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone counts. Why discredit the small groups & outreach of grass routes even on Twitter? Hilary ignored the rural areas - Trump had different approach & help his platform. It’s a digital battle now in many ways I think

0
CertainlyNotEdward 0 points ago +1 / -1

Trump went to Twitter because it's the most bang for his buck. A dictated tweet tapped in by a secretary and he can talk to tens or even hundreds of millions of people.

What you're suggesting is the exact opposite of that. It's silly and doesn't fit in with something he would do, at all.