Eh, it’s just with how this political system has been going, I could see a Coomer/Dominion win, and there are some strange things going on with the company that could suggest what amounts to a new can of paint for Dominion, that they could allege the company was bankrupted because of it. It’s extremely shady stuff, I’m no lawyer and don’t pretend to be so I could be 100% wrong in that department. There also is supposedly some environmental business Coomer and Co. have that are getting kickbacks, I’ve done no research yet on it myself, may be looking into that very very soon.
And absolutely, DePerno was the first guy I called upon to help me. Again with this, it’s just a worry that the climate during Bailey will never again exist to speed through a lawsuit to get discovery quickly to audit quickly. The law firm have told me it could be done in weeks even, just money really there on that front. I do have 3 firms that came highly recommended that I’ve sent communications to, maybe one will be a little cheaper.
Sorry, one is Snell & Wilmer. Should recognize them :)
The largest law firm representing the Trump campaign or its allies in post-election litigation challenging votes in key states has withdrawn from an election lawsuit in Maricopa County, Arizona. Associate Presiding Civil Judge Daniel Kiley on Tuesday granted Snell & Wilmer’s request to withdraw as counsel of record for the Republican National Committee. The RNC had teamed-up with the Trump campaign and the Arizona Republican Party in the case, which alleges that Maricopa County incorrectly rejected some votes cast on Election Day.
This is a cause for concern: they withdrew almost immediately:
Snell & Wilmer partners Brett Johnson and Eric Spencer first moved to withdraw on Sunday, a day after the case was filed.
Other law firms can cuck out under media pressure and social media pressure.
Two other large law firms that have represented the Trump campaign in election litigation, Jones Day and Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, have faced an onslaught of online criticism this week from critics who say the cases erode confidence in the democratic process, sparked by a Monday New York Times story focused on the firms' roles.
Obviously it slows down the process. And this case is one where the quicker it is filed and the process quick, the better. The attorneys (and maybe law firm, too) have to be as based and committed as the citizen(s) filing the suit.
Lawyers are supposed to be tough but too many are not as tough as we'd like to think. I respect the one-man army attorneys like Deperno.
I'd be shocked if there isn't at least one based Patriot attorney who isn't champing at the bit to get this case. You know what I'm saying? Every Patriot wants to do something and some Patriots are attorneys.
P.S. There was a GOP legal case some years ago. I forget the issue. The GOP's law firm was a major law firm. It was the type that has 500 attorneys, has been around forever, and everybody knows. Everything looks legit.
They started the case, but not long afterwards, they withdrew. They were criticized for being fickle or uncommitted.
The point is law firm size and reputation don't guarantee commitment.
The GOP must have thought, "It's a major firm and they've helped the GOP before. Let's go with them."
Many attorneys are in it for the money and they don't really care about the politics, or the change to politics that could result from the case. They are more interested in the case than the cause.
This election fraud needs a based lawyer who is more committed to the cause than the case. If they are committed to the cause, they'll be committed to the case.
It goes without saying now it means nothing if a law firm has previously represented the GOP. You've talked about how many fake GOP politicians there are whose basic cause is their parking space not our national security. You can bet there are as many fake GOP lawyers as there are fake GOP politicians.
Eh, it’s just with how this political system has been going, I could see a Coomer/Dominion win, and there are some strange things going on with the company that could suggest what amounts to a new can of paint for Dominion, that they could allege the company was bankrupted because of it. It’s extremely shady stuff, I’m no lawyer and don’t pretend to be so I could be 100% wrong in that department. There also is supposedly some environmental business Coomer and Co. have that are getting kickbacks, I’ve done no research yet on it myself, may be looking into that very very soon.
And absolutely, DePerno was the first guy I called upon to help me. Again with this, it’s just a worry that the climate during Bailey will never again exist to speed through a lawsuit to get discovery quickly to audit quickly. The law firm have told me it could be done in weeks even, just money really there on that front. I do have 3 firms that came highly recommended that I’ve sent communications to, maybe one will be a little cheaper.
Sorry, one is Snell & Wilmer. Should recognize them :)
S&W rep'd Trump but withdrew.
This is a cause for concern: they withdrew almost immediately:
Other law firms can cuck out under media pressure and social media pressure.
https://today.westlaw.com/Document/Ief147bd0247611eb8dfbdfeb7526f5c7/View/FullText.html
Obviously it slows down the process. And this case is one where the quicker it is filed and the process quick, the better. The attorneys (and maybe law firm, too) have to be as based and committed as the citizen(s) filing the suit.
Lawyers are supposed to be tough but too many are not as tough as we'd like to think. I respect the one-man army attorneys like Deperno.
I'd be shocked if there isn't at least one based Patriot attorney who isn't champing at the bit to get this case. You know what I'm saying? Every Patriot wants to do something and some Patriots are attorneys.
Well, they filed, libertarian party :).
Udall / Shumway
P.S. There was a GOP legal case some years ago. I forget the issue. The GOP's law firm was a major law firm. It was the type that has 500 attorneys, has been around forever, and everybody knows. Everything looks legit.
They started the case, but not long afterwards, they withdrew. They were criticized for being fickle or uncommitted.
The point is law firm size and reputation don't guarantee commitment.
The GOP must have thought, "It's a major firm and they've helped the GOP before. Let's go with them."
Many attorneys are in it for the money and they don't really care about the politics, or the change to politics that could result from the case. They are more interested in the case than the cause.
This election fraud needs a based lawyer who is more committed to the cause than the case. If they are committed to the cause, they'll be committed to the case.
It goes without saying now it means nothing if a law firm has previously represented the GOP. You've talked about how many fake GOP politicians there are whose basic cause is their parking space not our national security. You can bet there are as many fake GOP lawyers as there are fake GOP politicians.
Yeah, I dropped that entire idea. The libertarians I guess thought it was a good idea, but nah.