53
Comments (227)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
PlateOwner 2 points ago +2 / -0

P.S. There was a GOP legal case some years ago. I forget the issue. The GOP's law firm was a major law firm. It was the type that has 500 attorneys, has been around forever, and everybody knows. Everything looks legit.

They started the case, but not long afterwards, they withdrew. They were criticized for being fickle or uncommitted.

The point is law firm size and reputation don't guarantee commitment.

The GOP must have thought, "It's a major firm and they've helped the GOP before. Let's go with them."

Many attorneys are in it for the money and they don't really care about the politics, or the change to politics that could result from the case. They are more interested in the case than the cause.

This election fraud needs a based lawyer who is more committed to the cause than the case. If they are committed to the cause, they'll be committed to the case.

It goes without saying now it means nothing if a law firm has previously represented the GOP. You've talked about how many fake GOP politicians there are whose basic cause is their parking space not our national security. You can bet there are as many fake GOP lawyers as there are fake GOP politicians.

2
Nekroziz [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I dropped that entire idea. The libertarians I guess thought it was a good idea, but nah.