53
Comments (227)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
PlateOwner 3 points ago +3 / -0

Guys, I got a few days left, these sham audits the board believe will satisfy the judge (and the people).

Did you hear about the sham audit in Venezuela?

They got Jimmy Carter's boys involved. They liked the audit. They put out a big report.

Go to find out, reading the story, they had not only rigged the election but also the audit. They set a rule in the audit that the Carter crew accepted.

What rule was that?

'You can only test the computers we say you can test, not random samples.'

LoL!

5
Nekroziz [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

We have a guy who was involved in the Venezuelan elections with Dominion (well, Smartmatic which is Dominion), and Hello Garci scandal giving us data to ASOG. Pro V&V and SLI are involved in the latter.

2
PlateOwner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you have any more info on the Dallas election (2018)? I was looking today. Specifically I'd like to read on the legal challenges Russ talked about because the machine had errors. This could be a good path/precedent for challenging AZ on fraud. I believe he said he was called in because there was a dispute between both sides.

I find it odd that people are relitigating the voting machines or whether they are accessible online or can be hacked. The Dallas case seems to make that a settled and uncontested issue.

I also noticed something on Antrim today. Russ was talking about AZ but mentioned about 6,000 votes were unexplained in MI. Guess how many votes moved in one hack? About 6,000.

It still amazes me that despite all the sophisticated, talented and experienced engineers in America, she still has Third-World-level election security.

If election security is a national security issue and foreign enemies can and have hacked into county election systems, where is the military oversight?

6
Nekroziz [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh I do, let me dig that up (re: Texas election data). I know I have 2016 and 2018 somewhere.

And I’m not going to make this statement without full evidence, because this is the part where I can get myself in to trouble, but let me set a hypothetical line of questioning to you.

You think our military intelligence in cyber security is pretty good, right?

How would our military cyber security agencies/orgs NOT know about this? It was simple for someone like me to find out who is by no means a tech genius.

If like me you think they are pretty good at their jobs, you would think they do know, and by the deafening silence from these agencies, wouldn’t that logically lead you to posit that if they do know and did nothing, that they were most likely then involved?

Just a thought exercise of course.

2
PlateOwner 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hear you.

Russ's story about how DHS/CISA didn't show up for the meeting to talk about the impending hacked election was alarming. It needs to be amplified. I must dig it up.