Do you have any more info on the Dallas election (2018)? I was looking today. Specifically I'd like to read on the legal challenges Russ talked about because the machine had errors. This could be a good path/precedent for challenging AZ on fraud. I believe he said he was called in because there was a dispute between both sides.
I find it odd that people are relitigating the voting machines or whether they are accessible online or can be hacked. The Dallas case seems to make that a settled and uncontested issue.
I also noticed something on Antrim today. Russ was talking about AZ but mentioned about 6,000 votes were unexplained in MI. Guess how many votes moved in one hack? About 6,000.
It still amazes me that despite all the sophisticated, talented and experienced engineers in America, she still has Third-World-level election security.
If election security is a national security issue and foreign enemies can and have hacked into county election systems, where is the military oversight?
Oh I do, let me dig that up (re: Texas election data). I know I have 2016 and 2018 somewhere.
And I’m not going to make this statement without full evidence, because this is the part where I can get myself in to trouble, but let me set a hypothetical line of questioning to you.
You think our military intelligence in cyber security is pretty good, right?
How would our military cyber security agencies/orgs NOT know about this? It was simple for someone like me to find out who is by no means a tech genius.
If like me you think they are pretty good at their jobs, you would think they do know, and by the deafening silence from these agencies, wouldn’t that logically lead you to posit that if they do know and did nothing, that they were most likely then involved?
Russ's story about how DHS/CISA didn't show up for the meeting to talk about the impending hacked election was alarming. It needs to be amplified. I must dig it up.
Do you have any more info on the Dallas election (2018)? I was looking today. Specifically I'd like to read on the legal challenges Russ talked about because the machine had errors. This could be a good path/precedent for challenging AZ on fraud. I believe he said he was called in because there was a dispute between both sides.
I find it odd that people are relitigating the voting machines or whether they are accessible online or can be hacked. The Dallas case seems to make that a settled and uncontested issue.
I also noticed something on Antrim today. Russ was talking about AZ but mentioned about 6,000 votes were unexplained in MI. Guess how many votes moved in one hack? About 6,000.
It still amazes me that despite all the sophisticated, talented and experienced engineers in America, she still has Third-World-level election security.
If election security is a national security issue and foreign enemies can and have hacked into county election systems, where is the military oversight?
Oh I do, let me dig that up (re: Texas election data). I know I have 2016 and 2018 somewhere.
And I’m not going to make this statement without full evidence, because this is the part where I can get myself in to trouble, but let me set a hypothetical line of questioning to you.
You think our military intelligence in cyber security is pretty good, right?
How would our military cyber security agencies/orgs NOT know about this? It was simple for someone like me to find out who is by no means a tech genius.
If like me you think they are pretty good at their jobs, you would think they do know, and by the deafening silence from these agencies, wouldn’t that logically lead you to posit that if they do know and did nothing, that they were most likely then involved?
Just a thought exercise of course.
I hear you.
Russ's story about how DHS/CISA didn't show up for the meeting to talk about the impending hacked election was alarming. It needs to be amplified. I must dig it up.