Riddle me this...why would a man, BILL GATES, who has stated his EXTREME concern about world OVERPOPULATION also be involved/concerned with developing 'life-saving' vaccines to extend life expectancy? It makes no sense. That is a cross purpose...unless he is also including something in his little cocktail to help depopulate the world to his satisfaction, like something that would cause infertility or eventual early death, which has been stated as a concern by both vaccine makers and doctors across the world. I believe in Africa his DTP vaccine caused infertility or death in girls in a whole village. They actually banned him from doing his 'work' in the country.
Here's one article, but there are others. https://theirishsentinel.com/2021/01/12/dtp-vaccine-from-bill-gates-killed-10x-more-african-girls-than-disease-itself/
He's also buying up tons of farmland, it's possible he's going to corporatize farming in an attempt to eliminate small farmers so they can control the entire food supply so there is no alternative for when they implement social credit scores and cut people off from basic necessities.
Mark of the beast incoming
It's been in your fucking hand for years.
We have a bingo!
Bill Gates is a eugenicist who purchased the vaccine industry with his wealth from Microsoft to exploit a loophole that allows him to experiment on the human race and, among other things, depopulate the world.
He is a very sick and scary man, indeed.
I've pondered the exact same question and had a similar conclusion
I'm more concerned with him owning more than fifty percent of farmable land.
his claim is that people breed more when life expectancy is short, which is true, by increasing life expectancy he will effectively reduce the population
that is his claim.
This makes sense in Africa, not in Europe and the US, that barely reach replacement rates
Also, if it made sense in places like Africa or India, at this point we'd have started to see some level of drop-off in their population growth. It's been like 30 years, after all.
Yet, weirdly, their population growth stays pretty much the same.
I like to remember this every time he prattles on about "science!"
(Also, no this claim does not make sense, unless you wanna pretend the industrial revolution was just a fun name for an era and not a direct cause to both a reduction in population growth as well as an increase in life expectancy. You can't just hand the results of decades/centuries of cultural development to other nations without them going through the steps, no matter how hard you try.)
As an argument rising life expectancy reduces population growth does make sense, the reasons for the increase are another matter. Vaccines are part of the equation, but clearly not the only reason we live longer, clean water is by far bigger and in Europe this was reality in prehistoric times with aquaducts and waste management observed in prehistoric settlements in Greece for example
Came here to say this. Apparently this is true but, as you say, only in certain areas and under certain conditions. In places where there was a high rate of infant and adolescent mortality due to some disease, providing a vaccine for the disease prompted the mothers to have less children, since they didn't have to worry as much about their survival.
The important point to remember is this is the ONLY reason Gates got involved in vaccines: population control. If he cared so much about third world people, why not help them build roads, schools, and electrical grids etc.: things that would really lift them up? But oh no he does not want them to thrive! He wants them dead, just like he wants us dead.
From a legal document about the phizer shot
XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019- against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. **However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. **To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included. According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of post- vaccination infertility could be observed.
https://odysee.com/@TruthHertz:2/onceweretheliving:9 Smart dust