Only business owners can do it. That's another massive flaw in the plan. Self-employed people only make up a tiny percentage of the population. That's a significant part of the problem.
I don't see that as a viable plan. It's why they not only pivoted "slavery" from industrial factories, company towns, and plantations, to just income and sales taxes because it's way more profitable and outsources the costs of housing and upkeep to the slave, but they instituted it on a federal level after they consolidated power under the centralized tyrannical federal government through the instigated civil war that actually destroyed the USA and essentially nullified the Constitution that has just been held on to in order to string along the fools to think that "well, at least we still have the Constitution" and "the 2A protects the 1A" and other utterly meaningless tropes.
I don't disagree re. taxes, because it's precisely the way they enslave us today, but the only path I can see being successful is making the case that taxes are in fact slavery when the fruits of your labor are taken from you against your under threat of violence to support others directly and without your consent. It's the definition of slavery…. forced labor. And the only way you can escape the plantation is to leave everything behind and flee it to … where ? This isn't "Prison Planet", it's "Plantation Planet"
I was agreeing with you. Tax rebellion wouldn't be effective because there aren't enough people able to participate. Personally, I believe secession is the only viable way forward. It would likely start with a group of states, led by Texas, forming a separate union and then declaring independence. Realistically, though, that's just kicking the ball down the street. Any government we set up will be eventually infiltrated, just as our current one was.
What you're saying regarding the civil war is very interesting. Any sources you can refer me to so I can find out more? The pattern you lay out makes sense out of a lot of strange historical phenomena.
One question I'd really like answered is how do disruptive influences like TR and Trump manage to infiltrate and pull back the curtain for a time? Is it part of the plan? To make it seem as though we're taking back ground, when, really, we're not? Are they controlled opposition, or is it a legitimate chink in their armor we can exploit?
There's not really a single source I can point you to, re. the history. You really just have to built up an independent logical and cognitive framework of skills that you can use to think for yourself and think critically. Why anyone would even assume that what the existing power structure tells you is at all true in the most critical ways totally baffles me. There is not a single example in human history of where it matters that the ruling powers would tell the true story of what actually happened, and that assumes that they would even have the ability to do so; something that is extremely questionable. Just look to what they have been doing just this last year, or even the last four years. It's all lies upon lies.Yes, far more than normally out of a kind of desperate and panicked mania, but the method is the same.
Unfortunately, it will really take looking at many different things, including things like economics and finance of any given historical time (something that is both the most hidden and also the most critical aspects of any time), e.g., how did the economic system of the north and south, let alone their monetary and fiscal positions affect decision making; and you have to look at all that in context of the different social, religious, and economic interest groups by weight of their control and influence on specific areas of society and economy.
To your other question about Trump, I cannot go into that here or the camp guards will snuff my account out, but let me put it this way, there was in fact a plan, just ask yourself who's plan it was and to what end. Although he is a bit intense and fixated on a specific perspective you may want to look at knowmorenews dot org.
Only business owners can do it. That's another massive flaw in the plan. Self-employed people only make up a tiny percentage of the population. That's a significant part of the problem.
I don't see that as a viable plan. It's why they not only pivoted "slavery" from industrial factories, company towns, and plantations, to just income and sales taxes because it's way more profitable and outsources the costs of housing and upkeep to the slave, but they instituted it on a federal level after they consolidated power under the centralized tyrannical federal government through the instigated civil war that actually destroyed the USA and essentially nullified the Constitution that has just been held on to in order to string along the fools to think that "well, at least we still have the Constitution" and "the 2A protects the 1A" and other utterly meaningless tropes.
I don't disagree re. taxes, because it's precisely the way they enslave us today, but the only path I can see being successful is making the case that taxes are in fact slavery when the fruits of your labor are taken from you against your under threat of violence to support others directly and without your consent. It's the definition of slavery…. forced labor. And the only way you can escape the plantation is to leave everything behind and flee it to … where ? This isn't "Prison Planet", it's "Plantation Planet"
I was agreeing with you. Tax rebellion wouldn't be effective because there aren't enough people able to participate. Personally, I believe secession is the only viable way forward. It would likely start with a group of states, led by Texas, forming a separate union and then declaring independence. Realistically, though, that's just kicking the ball down the street. Any government we set up will be eventually infiltrated, just as our current one was.
What you're saying regarding the civil war is very interesting. Any sources you can refer me to so I can find out more? The pattern you lay out makes sense out of a lot of strange historical phenomena.
One question I'd really like answered is how do disruptive influences like TR and Trump manage to infiltrate and pull back the curtain for a time? Is it part of the plan? To make it seem as though we're taking back ground, when, really, we're not? Are they controlled opposition, or is it a legitimate chink in their armor we can exploit?
There's not really a single source I can point you to, re. the history. You really just have to built up an independent logical and cognitive framework of skills that you can use to think for yourself and think critically. Why anyone would even assume that what the existing power structure tells you is at all true in the most critical ways totally baffles me. There is not a single example in human history of where it matters that the ruling powers would tell the true story of what actually happened, and that assumes that they would even have the ability to do so; something that is extremely questionable. Just look to what they have been doing just this last year, or even the last four years. It's all lies upon lies.Yes, far more than normally out of a kind of desperate and panicked mania, but the method is the same.
Unfortunately, it will really take looking at many different things, including things like economics and finance of any given historical time (something that is both the most hidden and also the most critical aspects of any time), e.g., how did the economic system of the north and south, let alone their monetary and fiscal positions affect decision making; and you have to look at all that in context of the different social, religious, and economic interest groups by weight of their control and influence on specific areas of society and economy.
To your other question about Trump, I cannot go into that here or the camp guards will snuff my account out, but let me put it this way, there was in fact a plan, just ask yourself who's plan it was and to what end. Although he is a bit intense and fixated on a specific perspective you may want to look at knowmorenews dot org.