Alright? This is so idiotic. We can't have a third party, every single conservative that wants to save our country truly realises this, even Trump understands that a third party won't work.
We're going to primary every RINO and turn it back into the party of Lincoln. We're going to secure our elections. And we're going to be proud to say that we're Republicans.
Since you brought up securing our elections in your post, what are you going to do about them?
I've hired a lobbying firm for my state, Nevada. I've also called up every Republican legislator in NH, AZ, GA, PA, MI and WI: they're actively passing legislation to secure their elections. I've also donated heavily to Scott Presler and Matt Braynard's "Look Ahead America" PAC.
What's the time frame on securing these elections?
As it stands, they have solidified things like mail-in voting, and yet there is no legislation in any of those states to remove that, as far as I know.
Also, what about the judges who ignored any cases, and sat them aside during the last election. How do you plan to deal with them? What about the supreme courts of those states when they decide against the legislation that may have actually passed in said states?
One more thing, those states aren't the only ones with election fraud, so what about securing the other states as well? If those are fixed, who's to say it won't be the Carolinas, or Texas even?
Also, for Nevada, and other states, there are laws that allow illegal voting, how do you propose removing those laws? The first one involves illegals getting ID cards, and the second one involves registering voters when renewing, or applying for ID'S?
I am by no means trying to dissuade you, or say you aren't doing enough. I am just proposing questions that will have to be dealt with, due to what happened this last election.
By 2022.
AZ, GA, PA, NH, WI and MI have legislation: Scott Presler is tracking it, I urge you look at his work. Rand Paul is also going to the legislatures and lobbying them. Mail in voting was also, mostly, applied temporarily for this election in those states.
Courts don't get involved in election cases after the election, or at least it's highly unlikely which is what we saw. Robert Barnes is working with the courts, and a court in Virginia has already declared mail in voting to be illegal and barred it from being used next time.
Nevada is an uphill battle, since we don't have a Republican legislature. My goal is to first get rid of electronic voting machines, which is a big enough win.
If courts won't get involved in elections cases after the event of the elections occurred, then why are they involved in cases involving murders after the event of the murder occurred?