The documentary is very useful, especially the section on hacking, but the animated map of attacks is a bit misleading. The Deep Capture files, which appear to be the ones in the documentary, do show many cyber attacks on U.S. election systems, but those records only show votes changed in a small number of hacks, shown in the table above.
The U.S. government needs to stop using stupid generalities like "foreign interference" and start publishing very specific hacking data; otherwise their statements will have almost no impact.
Edit: Post title says graph. Meant table, of course.
Update
I was trying to track down the provenance of the data. It was brought to my attention in the recently released Absolute Proof documentary. Using the name of one hacker's network location identified in the background of the video, it was tracked to Patrick Bryne's site, Deep Capture.
In a news article it was reported Bryne said that he had been approached by a federal agent in 2018 and told to be quiet through the 2020 election. He concluded the 2020 election was going to be rigged.
Bryne also said that in the months preceding the 2020 election he was part of a team, or closely connected to a team, that was monitoring attempts to rig the election. I don't believe he went into detail about who was in this team or where it was based.
Mary Fanning, in the documentary in the section on hacking to steal the election, talks about the dataset of hacking records that appears in the documentary. She did not introduce the data or identify how she got it. It is the exact same data in the Excel file on DeepCapture.
It is not clear if Fanning got the data from Bryne, or if Bryne got the data from Fanning. Or if Fanning got her data from another source, and simply talked about the data that Bryne had posted on his site and was used in the documentary.
In an interview video in recent weeks, Fanning was asked where she got the data. She did not answer. She was asked again. Once again she did not answer. I think she was even asked a third time but would not say. She is a national security researcher and writer and her previous research has included a system used by the Deep State for spying. She has good reason to be very careful and very discrete with information and sources.
The most basic issue about credibility in one sense is whether or not the election machines were even online. All indications so far, including a forensic audit in Antrim, Michigan, are that the machines were indeed capable of being connected to the internet.
There are also indications that the data on these machines could not only have been accessed remotely from anywhere in the world, but also hacked in a way whereby the vote data could be modified.
VPN's or compromised corporate networks, could potentially be someone's home network, just anything they can send data through, could be Tor for all we know. Anything is possible.
I initially thought this vote flipping was pretty amateurish. I kept thinking, if I was them, I would have done this, or that, to hide it, turns out they pretty much did all of it. Now having a clearer picture, it's pretty crazy by how much Donald Trump won and the high ups must have just told everyone to do forward with the plan anyway, thus making it so obvious.
Pretty much why we'll never have a legitimate election ever again.
I mean it's not hard to mask your IP address, which is why in most instances IP intelligence in the cyber world is near useless as they can easily rotate to a new one. I would be more interested in having MAC proof of those IPs making connections to the dominion machines, to remove any argument of them not being connected to the internet.
Source: https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/US-Election-Fraud-2020_General.xlsx
The documentary is very useful, especially the section on hacking, but the animated map of attacks is a bit misleading. The Deep Capture files, which appear to be the ones in the documentary, do show many cyber attacks on U.S. election systems, but those records only show votes changed in a small number of hacks, shown in the table above.
The U.S. government needs to stop using stupid generalities like "foreign interference" and start publishing very specific hacking data; otherwise their statements will have almost no impact.
Edit: Post title says graph. Meant table, of course.
Update
I was trying to track down the provenance of the data. It was brought to my attention in the recently released Absolute Proof documentary. Using the name of one hacker's network location identified in the background of the video, it was tracked to Patrick Bryne's site, Deep Capture.
In a news article it was reported Bryne said that he had been approached by a federal agent in 2018 and told to be quiet through the 2020 election. He concluded the 2020 election was going to be rigged.
Bryne also said that in the months preceding the 2020 election he was part of a team, or closely connected to a team, that was monitoring attempts to rig the election. I don't believe he went into detail about who was in this team or where it was based.
Mary Fanning, in the documentary in the section on hacking to steal the election, talks about the dataset of hacking records that appears in the documentary. She did not introduce the data or identify how she got it. It is the exact same data in the Excel file on DeepCapture.
It is not clear if Fanning got the data from Bryne, or if Bryne got the data from Fanning. Or if Fanning got her data from another source, and simply talked about the data that Bryne had posted on his site and was used in the documentary.
In an interview video in recent weeks, Fanning was asked where she got the data. She did not answer. She was asked again. Once again she did not answer. I think she was even asked a third time but would not say. She is a national security researcher and writer and her previous research has included a system used by the Deep State for spying. She has good reason to be very careful and very discrete with information and sources.
The most basic issue about credibility in one sense is whether or not the election machines were even online. All indications so far, including a forensic audit in Antrim, Michigan, are that the machines were indeed capable of being connected to the internet.
There are also indications that the data on these machines could not only have been accessed remotely from anywhere in the world, but also hacked in a way whereby the vote data could be modified.
Has anyone seen the actual log files or raw packet captures that were the source of the presentation?
It's ALL China, just THROUGH those other countries. Haven't you ever seen Sneakers?
Unfortunately it's impossible to reliably determine the country of origin purely from the IP address.
Those votes were PURCHASED. Question is: who bought them and who got paid.
but what if they're all using VPNs?
VPN's or compromised corporate networks, could potentially be someone's home network, just anything they can send data through, could be Tor for all we know. Anything is possible.
I initially thought this vote flipping was pretty amateurish. I kept thinking, if I was them, I would have done this, or that, to hide it, turns out they pretty much did all of it. Now having a clearer picture, it's pretty crazy by how much Donald Trump won and the high ups must have just told everyone to do forward with the plan anyway, thus making it so obvious.
Pretty much why we'll never have a legitimate election ever again.
Why would you think England was on our side?
Our founding fathers technically took an entire land mass from them.
I bet that pissed of the crown.
I bet they swore to get them back.
I mean it's not hard to mask your IP address, which is why in most instances IP intelligence in the cyber world is near useless as they can easily rotate to a new one. I would be more interested in having MAC proof of those IPs making connections to the dominion machines, to remove any argument of them not being connected to the internet.