21
Comments (11)
sorted by:
2
0815 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, this approach is dumb and will not have the desired effect. You still have to pay your property taxes for the fields unless you want to loose your land. The issue with food commodities is, that the higher the supply, the lower the price. Less harvest, higher price, same income. People in the country and subburbs can grow their own gardens, the full city slickers can't. Conservatives need to embrace conservation. Make a soil conservation rule that limits fertilizer use. Yields will go down, higher crop prices, the soil will be able to improve and surface water will wash less nitrogen into our drinking water supplies (which we need to remove using costly chemicals). Higher prices and less supply for China. Higher crop prices coupled with using more heritage breeds, allow to offer higher quality and less quantity. China will have to pay more for pork. Rural areas can produce their own bio-gas for electric and heating. And we can do all of this while capturing the lefts environmental slogans to protect this and that.

1
CDP1984 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many good long term plans, I will give you that. I still believe siege warfare is the most sure way to root out Leftists and disrupt their agenda. Also you may be right about property taxes but American farmers have up to three years to do absolutely nothing and still get paid just for being farmers.

1
sentient-potato 1 point ago +2 / -1

We need to do this with businesses and events.

2
CDP1984 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. This will hurt them the most efficiently though, and keep our side from getting slaughtered by their control and strategic use of the military.

2
CDP1984 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Plus it's pretty hard for them to label us as "terrorists" if we are just standing there with our hands in our pockets. Not being aggressive.

0
CA4Newscum 0 points ago +1 / -1

What a fucking stupid way to punish citizens who are already victims. This is asinine.

0
CDP1984 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Welcome to the world. It is an unfair place. Sometimes really shitty things happen to nice people. I for one would rather suffer along side you and others for the greater good. Your statement is a knee jerk reaction that holds no merit.

0
CA4Newscum 0 points ago +1 / -1

No. The point is to focus rebuttal at the source of the issue, not contribute to unrest at the bottom end of the socio-economic ladder.

My statement is a measured response to a fucking stupid idea. Welcome to the world of discussion forums, where stupid ideas die quickly. And your graphics suck too.

0
CDP1984 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you really so dense that you fail to understand the "unrest at the bottom end of the socio-economic ladder" is exactly what the Republic needs to drive enough people to action? Or are you just another Leftist scum bag in a RINO suit? If it is the former, I suggest you go read A Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and realize this desire to coddle the bottom end has allowed this dystopian nightmare to get way more traction than it ever should have to begin with! Of course if you are the latter, may you get hit by a bus this very day.

0
CA4Newscum 0 points ago +1 / -1

First, I have not attacked you personally like you have to me. Cut the shit or be gone. Second, what you outline is exactly what Marxist Commie theory embraces, Stalin would be proud of your message and tactics. So, as opposed to reading fiction-fantasy, I'd suggest you study real history of Commie revolutions to see that the ideas your embracing are those of Marxists. If you want to develop a Commie government, keep following your playbook. If you want to return the Republic to it's former glory, this is not the way. You are not holding any higher ground with regard to educating anyone.

0
CDP1984 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Jesus Christ, our Republic is doomed. I couldn't even get past your first sentence.