57
Comments (7)
sorted by:
4
PodunkTexas 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nope, not going to buy it without her on the label. It was racist for them to take her off and I am not going to support a racist company. (ooh, shoe is on other foot now!)

4
At_The_Rally 4 points ago +4 / -0

What embarrassment this country is — to its own history and to a majority of its citizens

2
The_Memetect 2 points ago +2 / -0

exactly why is there a black in every commercial but a depiction of a black face on a product is considered rayciss? i think common sense left this world years ago.

1
RustedRage 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the commercial is about robbers and criminals, they all gonna be white.

1
Saltyminer11 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is exactly what I said when this happened

2
MAGA_SCIENCE 2 points ago +2 / -0

They complained about Aunt Jemima but put a face of Tubman on the currency. Same with Uncle Ben's. If it was the names of the product, they should have changed the name. Both are stupid and its something those companies should be ashamed of.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Land o' Lakes lady has been removed from her land and now lives on a reservation on benefits and hooked on opioids and cheap liquor.