It's been a year and without any sort of action taken most of the world would have been infected in only a few months, give or take. Sounds like it's working to me.
world would have been infected in only a few months
The projections have been way off so I think this a fallacy. You can just continue saying it would've been worse without it and it's not possible to prove it wrong.
The studies would show strong evidence to support masks, but the largest study was inconclusive and that's with proper masks. Lots of people wear shitty cloth and they force kids to wear masks because it gives them a false sense of security. They will mess up kids faces to virtue signal.
It's been a year and without any sort of action taken most of the world would have been infected in only a few months, give or take. Sounds like it's working to me.
The projections have been way off so I think this a fallacy. You can just continue saying it would've been worse without it and it's not possible to prove it wrong.
The studies would show strong evidence to support masks, but the largest study was inconclusive and that's with proper masks. Lots of people wear shitty cloth and they force kids to wear masks because it gives them a false sense of security. They will mess up kids faces to virtue signal.
You also can't say masks are doing nothing, then, and it'd be impossible to prove wrong, except you'd have even less evidence.
you know you can just test masks, which has already been done as I pointed out in my comment?
That's easier than going back in time and removing all restrictions and comparing the results.