Roberts wouldn't even preside over the hearing because it wasn't constitutional? Am I missing something or is this absolutely a clout move that is ethically corrupt and prosecutable?
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Roberts wouldn't even preside over the hearing because it wasn't constitutional? Am I missing something or is this absolutely a clout move that is ethically corrupt and prosecutable?
It seems to me that if they continue to waltz down this path they will suddenly find that although the Real President Trump may be impeached, etc. they are now subject to the same. Its setting precedent isn't it? I believe they will rue the day they went through with all this nonsense.