20
Comments (30)
sorted by:
2
YodaBannon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe this is all a big triple psyop and the US is going to nuke the CCP and blowtorch Iran. Trump and JunkieJoe will do the lift from Dirty Dancing.

1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

WHY DOES EVERYTHING SEEM SURREAL? THE STRONG HYPOTHESIS

If the Weak Hypothesis is correct and we are living through a psyop, who is behind the psyop? China is behind the psyop.

I am not the proverbial Old China Hand, but decades ago I was once a Young China Hand. Since the Chinese publication in 1998 of: Unrestricted Warfare: Two Air Force Senior Colonels on Scenarios for War and the Operational Art in an Era of Globalization, by Qiao Liang (乔良) and Wang Xiangsui (王湘穗), it has been understood that hard-line elements within the Chinese National Security community have been envisioning and positioning themselves for war with the USA. The “unrestricted” part of “unrestricted warfare” is the part that avoids direct military confrontation, and seeks instead to conquer through non-kinetic means.

In 2015, a lifelong China-dove (i.e., advocate of helping China stand up and prosper) named Michael Pillsbury wrote a book (The 100 Year Marathon) where he reversed course. He had been wrong all his professional life, he said, as he now understood that China had embarked on a 1949-2049 plan to turn the USA into a vassal state. In this book, he discussed a phrase circulating in Chinese national security literature: the “Assassin’s Mace” it had in the works for the USA. The reference, Pillsbury knew, was to an old Chinese story from the Warring States period, and refers to, in essence, a sucker punch one-punch knockout.

Nothing would be more of an Assassin’s Mace than a scheme to take out the USA with a rigged election that could not be unscrambled through our court system by January 6, thus making the Constitutional gears to affirm what had been presented as a fait accompli.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Boudicca2 0 points ago +2 / -2

I'm not scared of China and I'm sick to death of people trying to make me scared of China. We will absolutely destroy China if they keep trying to take us down. I have full confidence. China is weak sauce. A country of mostly poor peasants treated like shit by a cabal of soulless communists that control everything and own everything. They are ripe for a ferocious rebellion and revolution by the people and I can't wait to see it.

2
tremendous_trump2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't get it. With Biden as president, we won't even fight back as China takes us down. Whoever is speaking in Biden's earpiece is more than happy to join China in the great reset.

2
Boudicca2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Welp, since Biden IS in that Oval Office, I guess you'll just be giving up then? I'm not sure of your point. You seem to be basically telling me it's all over for the United States. I have no use for that.

1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

The poor peasants, which I saw on my trips there, have become incredibly wealthy due to our idiotic trade deals that GEOTUS fought back against.

You might not be afraid of China. Hopefully you are afraid of the CCP.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
SurfingUSA [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

请翻译成英文

(Translation in English please)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Boudicca2 1 point ago +3 / -2

And did I mention that no other country in the world actually LIKES China because of their evil government? They have no real allies. None. Whereas, in spite of how much tension we sometimes have with European and other nations all over the world, the USA will be flush with friends who will come to our aid if push comes to shove. Plan on that. The United States is the child of the world, the child of all these countries, the light of freedom and the country of heroes. We are loved in spite of what it seems like right now.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Boudicca2 0 points ago +2 / -2

But they have no emotional connection to China. It's just business. When it's just business, a lot less likely to risk a lot to help.

0
Boudicca2 0 points ago +2 / -2

Honestly, I really don't even think China WANTS a real war with the United States. They make a big chunk of their money off of us. If we are destroyed, who buys all their cheap ass products and keeps their factories humming? I think they're always willing to do us dirty, steal from us, and release lab created viruses to wreck our economy and affect our elections, but a hot war? With them leading it? I think not.

0
SurfingUSA [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's exactly the point of the Byrne article. China is winning a non-kinetic war with the U.S., one that will sap our population and allow them to take de facto control of our farmland, with no shots fired.

0
Boudicca2 0 points ago +2 / -2

that's not going to happen without a massive hot war and China doesn't want that. And just how exactly is China going to "sap" our population and what exactly does that mean?

2
SurfingUSA [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read Unrestricted Warfare by generals Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui.

https://www.oodaloop.com/documents/unrestricted.pdf

2
SurfingUSA [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

From Unrestricted Warfare:

At the time of the emergence of the early nation states, the births of most of them were assisted by blood-and-iron warfare. In the same way, during the transition of nation states to globalization, there is no way to avoid collisions between enormous interest blocs. What is different is that the means that we have today to untie the "Gordian Knot" [3] are not merely swords, and because of this we no longer have to be like our ancestors who invariably saw resolution by armed force as the last court of appeals.

Any of the political, economic, or diplomatic means now has sufficient strength to supplant military means. However, mankind has no reason at all to be gratified by this, because what we have done is nothing more than substitute bloodless warfare for bloody warfare as much as possible. [4] As a result, while constricting the battlespace in the narrow sense, at the same time we have turned the entire world into a battlefield in the broad sense. On this battlefield, people still fight, plunder, and kill each other as before, but the weapons are more advanced and the means more sophisticated, so while it is somewhat less bloody, it is still just as brutal. Given this reality, mankind's dream of peace is still as elusive as ever.

Even speaking optimistically, war will not be wiped out rapidly within the foreseeable future, whether it is bloody or not. Since things which should happen will ultimately come to pass, what we can and must focus on at present is how to achieve victory.

Faced with warfare in the broad sense that will unfold on a borderless battlefield, it is no longer possible to rely on military forces and weapons alone to achieve national security in the larger strategic sense, nor is it possible to protect these stratified national interests.

Obviously, warfare is in the process of transcending the domains of soldiers, military units, and military affairs, and is increasingly becoming a matter for politicians, scientists, and even bankers.

0
SurfingUSA [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you completely crazy??? Nobody "likes" anybody in international politics, it's all might makes right.

1
Boudicca2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Are you stupid? Politicians and political groups are made up of HUMANS with emotions. Humans DO like certain people and countries and it's pretty fucking obvious.

0
SurfingUSA [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure, whatever you say, Henry Kissinger will get back to you.

0
Boudicca2 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm sorry you're fucking scared of CHINA. I'm sorry you don't have any confidence in Americans to defend their country. i just don't happen to share your fear.

0
SurfingUSA [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

I hate to break the news to you that being "liked" means less than zero in Realpolitik.

1
Boudicca2 1 point ago +3 / -2

No actually sharing cultural heritage and roots is pretty important in the world of politics and does affect decisions made by politicians every single day. We share those cultural roots with Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and frankly, many of the Central and South American countries would side with us over China any day of the week, and as much as we bitch about Mexican border crossers, our two countries are very tied together and they're definitely going to help us in a conflict. Bet on it.

1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are completely daft. China is making huge inroads in the Caribbean and Canada and Latin America via its investments. You have the most naive view of how international relations really work I have ever read on a comment board. Are you a hippie in Taos, or what exactly.

0
Boudicca2 0 points ago +1 / -1

If I'm so daft then stop talking to me. You're insulting and rude and I'm bored with your bullshit. I probably know more about all these Chinese strategies than you do. I already know about China's dealings in the Caribbean and Canada and Latin America and you forgot to mention Africa and even Israel. Just fuck off with your fear. I'm fucking tired of defeatist cowards and you really sound like one. I was one of the first people on social media during the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax to point out it was China that was our true threat. That doesn't mean I have to cower in my boots and promote their intimidation tactics by creating fear on the Donald Trump forum. I have faith in myself and I have faith in Americans. If you don't, then fucking give up then and become a commie.

0
SurfingUSA [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Which is why the UK and Five Eyes tried to demolish DJT.

And there were pro-Trump rallies in JAPAN.

:: eyeroll ::

0
Boudicca2 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hello, if you're going to conflate MI6 with the English, then you might as well conflate the scumbag traitors currently occupying Washington, DC and the likes of John Brennan and James Comey with all the MAGA people on this forum and all the real patriots in office.

1
SurfingUSA [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you read? "The UK" and "the English" are not synonymous, dolt.

1
Boudicca2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh look, Semantics, the final battleground for you, the idiot who can't win a debate on content. FUCK OFF. I don't have to agree with you, you rude loser.