Honoring those African Americans that lost their jobs thanks to BLM
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (297)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
THIS! Do yourself a favor and get real maple syrup, high fructose corn syrup is a bomb in your body, that shit is several time more dangerous than sugar and it's already in a lot of foods, stop poisoning yourself with that trash.
government has been trying to kill us since 1964. That's when they burned every bit of legitimate health research, all of which was based on food. They unleashed their "4 food groups" lie. Suddenly breakfast was the most important meal of the day, consisting of carbs, carbs, and more carbs. Including HFCS.
Butter was bad, margarine was good. Heart disease and diabetes increased as those of us raised like this grew. Childhood obesity was still rare, but growing.
that's why my husband and myself, and many other healthy people, only eat animal sourced foods. In other words, meat.
Murica at its best.
some brain-fogged carb zombie downvoted my post. LOL!
This is true. Also the healthy foods are less so because Big Ag has stripped the soil and keeps messing with the genetics. Gluten in our wheat is unnaturally high. Monsanto is splicing pig DNA in tomatoes. It’s nuts.
Lol Monsanto did not splice pig DNA into a tomato. They tried it with flounder DNA years ago to winterize plants but they dropped the project.
The amount of GMO misinformation is just retarded. We have been fucking with plant genes for thousands of years and when we can finally do it at a genetic level all the sudden it's bad because someone watched a lefty documentary.
And of course, they upvote that looney toon shit here as if it's gospel.
It’s not the fact that it’s gmo, it’s that the gmo allows it to be more thoroughly tainted e.g. with glyphosate.
When we aren't doing it, the plants themselves are. They are perfect evolution farms.
I mixed it up with non Monsanto experiments with pig genes and oranges.
It was Monsanto acquired Calgene that utilized the antifreeze genes of a fish with the tomato. It was yanked from the market after being a failure but the technology kept being utilized and the process and studies done less transparent. The Calgene days were a simpler time and you can still comb through the FDA memos and see those gavage studies on rats and all the lesions in their stomachs. Makes you wonder why the hell it was ever approved.
There’s a difference between cross breeding and tinkering with genes. The former can be a problem when overdone (see jacked up gluten in wheat) but the latter is even more hazardous at the genetic level. Ask the father of molecular biology.
I’m not anti-science I’ve studied it for years but we also should exercise some common sense and discernment. We’ve been studying viruses for years but ´gain of function research’ was banned in this country for a reason. Nevertheless, our brilliant scientific minds continued to fund it in places like Wuhan and we saw how that went.
I prefer a precautionary principle. It’s one of the things the European Union got right. Non-GMO food tastes and smells better, is sustainable and self sufficient, and less taxing on body particularly the gastrointestinal system.
I also don’t trust a mega agrochemical company with undue influence in big government that has shown to commit great harm with little to no consequences. When you know how the FDA works or doesn’t work, you’d be more cynical of what’s in the American soil and food supply.
My skepticism of GMO does not come from lefty documentaries but way back to oil eating bacteria that failed spectacularly on a clean up job.
I did not know that - Johnny Carson
I do know that spinach had 17x more nutrients in the 50's.
Supposedly the new style of farming that avoids plowing starts restoring soil in a couple years and brings it back to health after maybe 5 years. I don't know if this is true. It may be another trick? It's sort of along the lines of "organic" though.
Organic tomatoes that taste like bacon?
Also heavy metals can leech into soil overtime and end up on what you consume. I drink kratom which comes from indonesia and i know theres a lot of heavy metals in the soil over there. Wonder if mosanto and their pig splicing know anything about corona's splicing. Both are living organisms not that far apart.
Government does it best to stop drugs coming over the border but then let's companies advertise food loaded with poison.
Government controls illegal drugs coming into our borders. They would like a monopoly.
Before poppy based opiates became an epidemic here, we had soldiers guarding poppy fields in Afghanistan. Just as one example.
Wrongo, I grew up with real maple syrup but nothing is better than original Aunt Jemima maple flavored corn syrup. It rules.
No, it doesn't do anything different in your body and no, people who eat it aren't dirtier inside than you. What are you, a Pharisee now lol bringing back 'dirty and clean' foods so you can feel more sinless and pure lol
No, it just becomes good old delicious sugar in your body like any other and then you get to lift weights and make love to your wife with the energy you get from it. Good stuff!
Tell that to a diabetic. HCFS is the worst.
Yes but for non diabetics it's fine. Given that you don't overindulge. Diabetes has a lot to do with genetics over how much sugars you eat
Tell a diabetic natural maple syrup is healthy for them.
and if by HCFS you mean 'high fructose corn syrup' then no, its not any worse or any better than any other sugars. It's a religious belief you have to make yourself feel less sinful inside than someone else.
Nope. My personal experience disagrees. I don’t care what other people eat but I do care how it affects my body.
Totally subjective matter, If you think it tastes better that's you, this is the first time someone tell me that maple flavored corn syrup tastes better than real maple syrup, so completely subjective matter, second thing, don't make a fallacy of my statement, something being unhealthy doesn't mean "clean or dirty", all the sugars in excess are bad, me saying that Corn Syrup is unhealthy has nothing to do with religious dogmas or anything like that, you obviously are free to eat and also do with your body what you wish so if you think that HFCS taste better than real maple syrup then enjoy it.
I've had plenty of both and the corn syrup is so sweet. It's like candy. Real maple syrup tastes like tree sap.
The environment in which we have grown has conditioned us in several ways, in different degree from people to people, in your case your taste is conditioned to compare the sweets with candies' sweetness, which is very very high, you will understand what I'm saying with this example, if you're the kind of people that like his food a little spicy but then eat something from places that use huge amount of peppers and other hot spices, you maybe wouldn't be able to eat those foods but people from those places that eat the food you consider tasty and spicy will immediately look into Hillary's purse for the hot sauce bottle cause for them that food is bland. All excess are bad -sweets, spices, etc- but if we just focus on taste in my case a sweet as sweet as candy is too much, not saying I dislike candies, but there are things for my taste that don't need to have a generic taste like just sugar with a little bit of "X" -maple in this case- but a nice taste of "X" with the right doze of sweet.
You're incorrect. It's as good as any other sugar and sugar keeps you from dying.
and yes, I think you believe in that for religious reasons and nothing else.
Corn syrup and HFCS aren't the same thing because HFCS got all sorts of lobbyists to get gov't definitions changed so we truly don't know WTF is really in HCFS. It's like how "natural flavor" isn't.
Absolutely false. You know nothing about HFCS.
False, you know false lies about 'HFCS' and its a magic belief you hold to feel superior and cleaner and stronger than others.
One of the reasons we know this is because in a double-blind study we could feed you corn syrup or any other sugars and you'd never once notice any difference, feel any different, you would also show no difference in tasks, athletic ability, skills, energy and then the best doctors would not be able to identify any difference aligning to any of the sugar.
Its all psychosomatic and a religious belief you want to have.
Nope. There are plenty of differences, that do show up consistently.
Nothing that you're looking for here though. Yet another example of supposed medical "studies" designed stupidly.
Go ahead and knock yourself out with it, you'll never know the difference ;)
I get the nostalgia, but that stuff is bad for you.
Most processed food isn't healthy, but those who can't abstain (for whatever reason) just need to use sparingly. One of the great things about walking away from the MSM is more time to cook for ourselves.
Nope, its fine and you can still buy it and bathe your pancakes in it today. The only thing you'll do is get stronger.