3162
Comments (90)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
29
devnull 29 points ago +29 / -0

Completely missing the point.

The fraud is intended be small enough that it is not noticed or ignored at a precinct or county level.

Electronic voting machines enable shaving small numbers of votes from Republican precincts and Republican counties. This is what was observed in the Edison data on election night.

This might not appear large at first. Assume there are:

  • 50 republican counties in a state
  • 50 precincts per county
  • 100 votes flipped per precinct

250,000 = 50 * 50 * 100

This is a swing of 500,000 votes in a statewide or national election because you are taking away 250,000 votes from one candidate and awarding to another.

The number of votes flipped per precinct would be randomized to prevent detection or fingerprinting.

Before electronic voting machines, Democrats could only rig voting totals in their own counties, which meant it was more difficult to win statewide and national elections.

Now with electronic voting machines installed statewide, Democrats (or their allies) can remotely shave votes from Republican counties by hacking or by tampering with the voting system firmware, which reduces the total amount of votes to be manufactured or flipped in their own counties in the middle of the night.

Predictive algorithms can be created using a model based on previous elections (national, statewide) and can be adjusted on election night (this is why all the Democrat controlled counties stopped counting on election night).

On a recount, suspicion of fraud usually turns to the Democrat counties who have opportunities to backfill in a required amount of counterfeit paper ballots to match voting machine totals from election night. Counterfeit ballots are pre-printed in massive numbers before election night, and only used if required (Example: all those ballots marked for Biden only with no down ballot Democrat candidates selected)

On the other hand small numbers of voting discrepancies at the precinct level in Republican counties might be missed unless a Republican county notices a statistically significant anomaly and performs a hand recount, which is what happen in Antrim County, Michigan where they discovered over 5,000 votes had been flipped from Trump to Biden.

Electronic voting machines need to be completely removed. The incentives and opportunities for massive fraud is too great.

TLDR;

Electronic voting systems are used to rig election night reporting (narrative control), then counterfeit paper ballots are backfilled in Democrat counties to an approximate amount to be close enough to pass a hand recount. Electronic voting machines reduce the amount of visible fraud required in Democrat counties as votes can now be remotely stolen from Republican counties.

Democrats and their allies can hack or install compromised firmware (vendor) to randomly flip small amounts of votes at the precinct level in Republican counties to the Democrat candidate. Remotely shaving small numbers of votes from each precinct can add up quickly and change the result of a statewide or national election.

14
Pumpitrealgood 14 points ago +14 / -0

They have been rigging elections for a long time. That is how they stole the vote from Dr. Ron Paul. He was poised to win against Romney, and would likely have beat Obama. They had to stop him, and they did so with Diebold (later changed named to Dominion)

Look at those links

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByJAC-sfXwumdkE4d0Y2eWtURTZ2eDM5RmlLc3ZhQQ/edit?pli=1

https://docs.google.com/file/edit?id=0ByJAC-sfXwumZzI2bVlON2VTMnFyYVZZSnpDYnNyQQ&pli=1

3
devnull 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also has been used by Democrats to rig election primaries.

See Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020 (Bernie, sheepdog for Hillary/Biden)

https://blackagendareport.com/bernie-sanders-sheepdog-4-hillary

See also Tim Canova vs Debbie Wassermen Schultz in the 2016 and 2018 primaries.

Tim Canova was the challenger to Wassermen Schultz in 2016 just after she was terminated as the head of the DNC following the seth rich murder and wikileaks dump of DNC emails.

Canova 'lost' the primary by a wide margin which drew suspicion.

Canova sued for an audit after statistical patterns of fraud were noticed. Brenda Snipes, the election supervisor of Broward County, FL ignored a court order and destroyed all ballots. Federal law requires all counties to retain physical ballots in national elections for 22 months.

Canova published results of an audit. I think he was working with Bev Harris.

2
bkenewell 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh man. Wow! That's new to me. Repost it everywhere you can. Could help explain two things I've been wondering about:

  1. Mitt Romney's behavior under President Trump. Why would he side with the Democrat Party when it was contrary to his prior views?

Romney's dirty. And with the whole religion thing, he can't stomach being outed as such. His family, his church, and all around him would be damaged. Being truly motivated by church and family, he finds a way to shield them by villainizing President Trump. Meanwhile, he becomes the bitch of those who helped rig the primaries for him and tows the uniparty line.

  1. Paul Ryan's exit from politics. It's always bothered me as to why. He had spent a lifetime dedicated to sincere civil service, as in a calling toward something he truly believed in. Then he threw it all away... why?

Paul Ryan leaves politics because of the scam. It's better to leave than to continue on corruptly. He goes back home and lives working in the private sector for a while. What's weird is he then moves back from Janesville, Wisconsin to a DC suburb in Maryland in August, 2019... and takes a seat on the Board of Directors of Fox Corp, the parent of Fox News, Fox Television, and Fox Sports just prior to the election cycle and the even weirder flipping of Fox News to the Dem agenda.

Now that people are onto them, there will be an even bigger push to control the voting and control what people can say. It's the way totalitarian systems operate historically. More resistance --> more pushing.

1
Stanford 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought a Clinton/Podesta email released by Wikileaks in 2016 suggested appointing a relative of Paul Ryan to the Supreme Court but I can't find it.

4
TheSleepingPresident 4 points ago +4 / -0

If it weren’t costing us our freedom, I would be in awe of what they did.

10
devnull 10 points ago +11 / -1

There is only one solution where there will be free and fair elections in the United States.

  1. Remove all electronic voting machines
  2. Do not permit mail-in ballots to be accepted on or after election day.
  3. Require all mail-in ballots to be counted and tabulated before live in-person voting commences
  4. Restrict mail-in voting to US military, the disabled, or elderly past the age of 65.
  5. Require photo id verification for mail-in ballot applications and live in-person voting.

If you allow electronic voting machines you can shave votes (flip, delete) and change election night reporting. It's not just hacking either. In Georgia the adjudication rate was reported over 60% in some counties permitting corrupt elections supervisors to massively manipulate the ballots cast.

If you permit mail-in ballots to be accepted on or after election day you can perform analysis of live in person voting and predictively determine how many mail-in ballots are required to change the outcome of an election.

It's not difficult to see how the fraud was committed, because the systems themselves were weakened to permit it.

5
Deplora 5 points ago +5 / -0

Abolish all absentee/mail-in voting, except for very special exceptions for US government and military personnel stationed overseas, whose locations and/or duties make it impossible or unsafe for them to travel to the nearest US Embassy/Consulate or military base to vote in person. People who can't get to a polling place should not be allowed to vote, period.

One of the most important aspects of our voting system is casting secret ballots. Only truly secret ballots can be free of coercion or retaliation. Anyone who is filling out a ballot outside of a polling place can be coerced into voting as the coercer directs, or coerced into showing their vote with the knowledge that they may face retaliation. The coercer can be union bosses, abusive spouses, caregivers in nursing homes and assisted living facilities who are in a position to intimidate patients via threats of abuse or neglect (and in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, it's common for caregivers to "help" patients complete ballots, in some cases for patients who are legally blind and unable to confirm whether their ballot was filled out as directed). The coercers can also be neighborhood ballot harvesters, who insist on seeing the ballots before they're sealed in an envelope, and may threaten or arrange retaliation for "wrong" votes" or discard "wrong" ballots instead of delivering them as promised.

We need to harp on the fact that the only freely cast vote is an inherently secret vote.

1
infinitysupreme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also: Signature verification and unique vote serial number which the voter and third parry auditors can use to fully trace the vote and verify it was counted correctly.

2
ClarenceBeeks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes exactly