I'll only accept that to be true if Crowder gets some deliverables out of him. Cruz pretended to be redpilled for a time under Trump. It seems some people need a continuous dosage regimen to stay innoculated from bullshit MSM narratives. Cruz is one of those guys that, if he doesn't keep up the dose, will go back to being a sellout real fast.
I want to like him too, but it's very hard to do that with how he behaves. He walks the thin line between being a real patriot with some balls and being a crony establishmentarian. Too often he falls on the wrong side of the line and it creates trust issues. Romney is Romney and you know exactly how you feel about him any given day. Same goes for Hawley. People like Hawley because he's upfront about who he is. It's the fence sitters that everyone hates because you can never tell whose side they're on.
You miss my point. Romney is bad. Everyone knows he's bad. Nobody is surprised when he stabs us in the back. When Cruz does it it catches people by surprise and sows distrust among the movement. My point is that the fence sitters are the ones that cause the most problems in the end, not the clearly labeled good guys and bad guys. The deepest circle of hell is reserved for traitors.
Ted Cruz would need to openly challenge Mitch McConnell and demand he resign for McConnell's failure to secure the capitol building beforehand. Anything short of that, he can go fuck himself.
Crowder better take Cruz to task. Cruz doesn't get to do the classic Republican chicken footing about Trump. Republicans love to concede points to the left to seem reasoned in their arguments. It's a rhetorical tool they think helps them build ethos with their audience, but all it does is make them seem like inconsistent hypocrites. The left is never moved by these gestures of apparent good faith and the right sees it for what it is, a cynical ploy to appear moderate without rather than do the hard job of defending the utterly defensible behavior of a controversial figure. Republicans need to learn they are in the same boat as Trump and, rather than sell him out from time to time to seem more moderate by comparison, should say "Today they come after Trump, tomorrow they come after me, it's time to draw a line and defend it."
Pfft, Cruz is a consummate politician who lies for a living and says whatever is necessary at the time to further the appearance of standing up for conservatives.
Nothing crowder has in his bag of tricks will stump Cruz from smiling his way through this interview and coming out squeaky clean.
It will also kill the need to have subsequent interviews with any other source. Cruz will be able to say, “look at the interview with crowder if you have any questions.”
This could be as much a referendum on crowder as it is cruz. If he softballs the interview I'll know he's been got. Everyone knows cruz is an opportunist already so it's crowder's game to lose. He can get some good sound bytes (unlikely) or sit on a fencepost and let Ted skate by without any serious discussion. Crowder better deliver lest he join the ranks of wallace and shapiro
As I see it, Crowder already lost by suggesting he has tough questions. This isn’t an angle that will garner respect because ted will answer them and simply move on.
If he actually skipped questions and rick rolls Cruz with a smack down of statements, he might actually get the attention of those who have no will to listen to a wind bag of political rhetoric.
Might I suggest, “Ted, you’re a lying politician and your days are numbered” as an opener?
The only reason Cruz is going on his show is because he plans on running in 2024, which means he is rejecting Trump running in 2024, which Cruz is a fucking shill.
Even Ted can come back from this if he finally takes the fucking red pill.
He’s a faggot tyrant with a whore wife.
2 sides of the same grifter. Cruz is a swamp creature
I'll only accept that to be true if Crowder gets some deliverables out of him. Cruz pretended to be redpilled for a time under Trump. It seems some people need a continuous dosage regimen to stay innoculated from bullshit MSM narratives. Cruz is one of those guys that, if he doesn't keep up the dose, will go back to being a sellout real fast.
I really don't want Ted Cruz to fuck up, does that make sense? Dude has potential, and him making a fool of 'Beto' was the highlight of 2018.
I want to like him too, but it's very hard to do that with how he behaves. He walks the thin line between being a real patriot with some balls and being a crony establishmentarian. Too often he falls on the wrong side of the line and it creates trust issues. Romney is Romney and you know exactly how you feel about him any given day. Same goes for Hawley. People like Hawley because he's upfront about who he is. It's the fence sitters that everyone hates because you can never tell whose side they're on.
Romney is 10x worse than Cruz. Cruz at least did challenge electoral votes.
You miss my point. Romney is bad. Everyone knows he's bad. Nobody is surprised when he stabs us in the back. When Cruz does it it catches people by surprise and sows distrust among the movement. My point is that the fence sitters are the ones that cause the most problems in the end, not the clearly labeled good guys and bad guys. The deepest circle of hell is reserved for traitors.
I get you. I simply wish that Ted would have humbled himself when he lost. That's all.
Ted Cruz would need to openly challenge Mitch McConnell and demand he resign for McConnell's failure to secure the capitol building beforehand. Anything short of that, he can go fuck himself.
Fair point. Nothing less than telling McConnel to fuck off would inspire any faith in Trump supporters.
Crowder better take Cruz to task. Cruz doesn't get to do the classic Republican chicken footing about Trump. Republicans love to concede points to the left to seem reasoned in their arguments. It's a rhetorical tool they think helps them build ethos with their audience, but all it does is make them seem like inconsistent hypocrites. The left is never moved by these gestures of apparent good faith and the right sees it for what it is, a cynical ploy to appear moderate without rather than do the hard job of defending the utterly defensible behavior of a controversial figure. Republicans need to learn they are in the same boat as Trump and, rather than sell him out from time to time to seem more moderate by comparison, should say "Today they come after Trump, tomorrow they come after me, it's time to draw a line and defend it."
Cruz is the biggest disappointment in the whole mess.
Pfft, Cruz is a consummate politician who lies for a living and says whatever is necessary at the time to further the appearance of standing up for conservatives.
Nothing crowder has in his bag of tricks will stump Cruz from smiling his way through this interview and coming out squeaky clean.
It will also kill the need to have subsequent interviews with any other source. Cruz will be able to say, “look at the interview with crowder if you have any questions.”
This could be as much a referendum on crowder as it is cruz. If he softballs the interview I'll know he's been got. Everyone knows cruz is an opportunist already so it's crowder's game to lose. He can get some good sound bytes (unlikely) or sit on a fencepost and let Ted skate by without any serious discussion. Crowder better deliver lest he join the ranks of wallace and shapiro
As I see it, Crowder already lost by suggesting he has tough questions. This isn’t an angle that will garner respect because ted will answer them and simply move on.
If he actually skipped questions and rick rolls Cruz with a smack down of statements, he might actually get the attention of those who have no will to listen to a wind bag of political rhetoric.
Might I suggest, “Ted, you’re a lying politician and your days are numbered” as an opener?
The only reason Cruz is going on his show is because he plans on running in 2024, which means he is rejecting Trump running in 2024, which Cruz is a fucking shill.
WOW!!