The argument was always framed As Trump and his team trying to disenfranchise votes, looking for certain baskets of votes they could disqualify and Cetera.
I don't know that I heard anybody, however, clearly and cogently make the argument that the people cheated are the ones who disenfranchised votes.
If I hire you to take half a million dollars to the bank, and you Shuffle in another half million dollars in counterfeit currency and then split into two suitcases, you were the one who has rendered the money invalid.
I'm still quite pissed that nobody has clearly made this argument on the big screen, in the public Sphere, for people to hear.
It won't matter, liberals have no intellectual honesty, they only care to win the argument regardless of merit or logical consistency.
In Atlanta and Detroit it was obvious ballots were run through the tabulation machines multiple times. Their ejudication rate reached absurd levels. Given this, an audit should be conducted and the paper ballots, the source document, counted. Furthermore election supervisors should be fired for not maintaining standards.
Of course this would not disenfranchise anyone, but the argument went that you could not question the vote count in urban areas or you were disenfranchising black people.
They are counting on candy ass white people being afraid of the R word and letting the fraud stand. Look at the testimony of a woman who has worked on the election boards for 20 years in the Detroit area. She said the urban areas were always allowed to have their poll books a mess, the numbers not turned in a timely manner ECT. No one was held accountable, no one was fired. The suburbs weren't allowed to get away with such shotty work, but year after year the urban areas couldn't get the poll books to balance and no one dared question them. Having standards = racism. Its that easy, just hide behind the big R, and the argument is over.