1316
Comments (87)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Both" and I didn't even mention two things.

1
PropagandaWizard1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or you would just set the building on fire instead of using a fucking bomb in the street which wouldn't even be guaranteed to do what you want it to do.

False statement 1: Implying a fire would accomplish the same goal as a huge fucking bomb.

Why it's wrong:

Fire is easy to put out and hard to spread. Commercial buildings have fire doors on stairwells designed to slow the spread of fire through out a building. Buildings like that have advanced fire suppression systems often linked to control centers off site. You would have to break into the secured building an start fires in multiple locations carrying more gas than a single person can lift. You would never be able to start and spread a fire before suppression systems and local firefighters arrived to stop the blaze. On top of this the alleged target was in the basement or under the street. Fire tends to travel upwards not downwards like to a basement. The fiber optic cables were supposed to be below the RV and there were basement access hatches blown off right next to the RV bomb. Note fiber optics stop working the second the outer cable is damaged at all. Fiber optics are just glass strands and I am guessing a large explosion would crack and break all those strands via shock wave and such with ease. Basically fire would never do what that bomb did.

False statement 2: A bomb in the street wouldn't be guaranteed to do what you want it to do.

Why it's wrong:

This statement describes fire much better than a bomb. Bombs have exact yields, exact explosive forces, blast patterns, and can be controlled down to the slightest detail. Why do you think they use explosives to demolish buildings and call it "controlled demolitions"? Combat engineers in the military train for the exact ways to blow up infrastructure with the least amount of explosives as possible to get the exact result desired. They also train with different types of pre-made and improvised products to get the job done.

This reads like a highly trained person carried it out, possibly trained by the government. There was even an audio warning played that gave people enough time to evacuate the area but not enough time for the Bomb Squad to respond.

In closing you can't even re-read your simple post and pick out two different assertions you made so I will assume you are more smooth brain than I thought. Doubtful you understand anything I just typed but here I am wasting my time anyway....something I try to avoid. Please read a book and get smarter, you hurt my soul with your ignorance.

0
PraiseBeToScience 0 points ago +1 / -1

On top of this the alleged target was in the basement or under the street.

I love how you used this as an argument but then can't explain how the fuck you think a bomb that was effectively an air-burst (given that it was in an RV) that didn't even crater the street was somehow going to blow up the basement and make the computers unrecoverable.

Hard drives are durable, and solid state storage is even more durable. Even if you blew up a wall and smashed servers with debris, you will almost certainly be able to recover most, if not ALL of the data from them.

Guess what, you can't recover data from incinerated drives.

That was a lot of fucking typing for "I'm a LARPer".

You should tell that "the military uses the least amount of explosives to destroy a target" to the Pave Hawk we dropped 8K lbs of GBU-31s on just because the TACPs thought it would be awesome to see it blow up.

1
PropagandaWizard1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey ass hat I was in the military were you?

You are deflecting from all my points and avoiding where I proved you were a smooth brain. You can't even fucking read like a normal human. No one is talking about air delivered bombs you disgusting idiot. Can you carry an 8,000 pound bomb cunt? I didn't think so. Meaning when you are in a unit deployed ON FOOT you need to carry the least amount of explosives to get the job done. DAMN YOU'RE STUPID!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_engineer

I never said data drives were the target smooth brain, I said the fiber cables and resulting telecom blackout was. Sometimes they do this shit just to insert CIA planted techs during clean up so the techs can backdoor the systems by hand. Ask the DNC they do it often.

I also have a degree in fire science so go eat a banana you fucking talking monkey.