I get the anger, I share it, but this is a time for pragmatism. We need to be vocal when they say things we like and give credit when they do things we like.
That's not to say we forget, but the scary truth is that all that stands between us and the worst excesses of the Democrats is a hand full of RINOS who know which side there bread is buttered.
As a South Carolinian, the excuse was: "We all hate Lindsey Graham, but we need to keep the Republican majority. Hold your nose and vote for him". Well, guess what? The Republicans no longer have the majority. Time for Lindsey to go.
They analyzed his voting record. He had a 20% on the "Constitution rating" for his votes. Chuck Schumer? He got a 30%.
Chuck-friggin'-Schumer had a higher score than Lindsey Graham!!!
That lisping, mincing heap of mother-love has to go.
I think I covered that preemptively in the OP, but have at it.
This is "shoot the messenger" upside down.
You're killing the goddamn message.
So the traitor states the obvious and all of a sudden we're supposed to applaud him?
I get the anger, I share it, but this is a time for pragmatism. We need to be vocal when they say things we like and give credit when they do things we like.
That's not to say we forget, but the scary truth is that all that stands between us and the worst excesses of the Democrats is a hand full of RINOS who know which side there bread is buttered.
So rah rah, go get em Lindsey!
As a South Carolinian, the excuse was: "We all hate Lindsey Graham, but we need to keep the Republican majority. Hold your nose and vote for him". Well, guess what? The Republicans no longer have the majority. Time for Lindsey to go.
They analyzed his voting record. He had a 20% on the "Constitution rating" for his votes. Chuck Schumer? He got a 30%.
Chuck-friggin'-Schumer had a higher score than Lindsey Graham!!!
That lisping, mincing heap of mother-love has to go.