4385
Comments (310)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
26
Donger-Lord2 26 points ago +37 / -11

Don’t give a fuck. Ban them all together, all life begins at conception. Give the women and doctors who attempt to do the abortions the death penalty for genocide.

9
jigglyp33n 9 points ago +9 / -0

But then how will democrats finally get rid of black pipo

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
PM_Me_Ur_Weird_Bendy 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're reasonable if the mothers life is at risk... But what's funny about that stance is in statistics it lies under the "supports abortion" selection

-1
logan34 -1 points ago +11 / -12

Why do we care about this abortion issue so much I honestly dont understand? Seriously, it would do the country better if lefties had LESS babies. Can you imagine the amount of welfare money we've saved by letting idiots abort their own commie kin? Not to mention more useful idiot voters. I seriously could care less.

4
VoidWanderer 4 points ago +7 / -3

Can you imagine the amount of welfare money we've saved by letting idiots abort their own commie kin?

You really don't understand the situation, at all, do you?

Let me explain it in the most simple terms I can. The amount of welfare money hasn't decreased with open access to abortions, it's increased because women have realized that they can get paid to have children they didn't want, either in welfare of child support. They could have aborted those children, on the taxpayer dime, but they chose not to because they realized those children mean a guaranteed check and other benefits even if she treats them like trash.

Abortions don't stop the welfare state. Enforcing responsibility does. When you don't get free money and other benefits for intentionally getting knocked up and you are required to take care of the child, and only you if it's shown you lied to the man to get pregnant, then the rate of single motherhood will drop off a cliff. Responsibility is a woman's kryptonite. Force it and they stop the shenanigans.

3
deleted 3 points ago +9 / -6
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
-1
TheTelltaleFly -1 points ago +3 / -4

...said the person lucky enough not to have been aborted. Don’t worry; abortion is and continues to be the leading cause of death worldwide. 40 million lives every year. I happen to believe we will all be judged for allowing this to happen by almighty God but hey, think of all the welfare money we’re saving.

1
logan34 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would you be okay to live in a communist shithole where abortion is banned? Who gives a shit.

1
The_Emperor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe I wouldn't be a person if aborted. I'm me only because I'm me. I'm thankful to be raised in this body, in this time, in this country by my loving fam. I was raised. I don't remember being in utero. Is every sperm sacred? 2/3 of America are far more worried about the rights of those living here being infringed, than the theological nature of sentient life. We WILL forever lose if we focus on absolutist antiabortion position.

-16
rangers24 -16 points ago +7 / -23

I don’t agree. I think abortion should be allowed until the start of the second trimester, and up until birth if there’s a real risk of delivering the baby. I don’t think someone should have to chose potential death to give birth to a baby just because of your personal views.

2
tholins 2 points ago +3 / -1

After the first trimester, an abortion has to be conducted surgically. That is, they still have to go in, and pull the baby out, through the woman’s vagina.

There are literally no conditions that would justify killing a baby in the third trimester; the mother still basically has to give birth at that point, so anything you’re trying to avoid there would be moot.

Name me one condition for a pregnant woman that is guaranteed to be fatal even with proper medical care.

3
rangers24 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m guessing you’ve never heard of a cesarean or c-section before, because that’s what would actually happen if it was needed.

It’s also extremely rare to need an abortion at that point. Unless the baby was going to be a still born or some other rare occurrences that a women’s life is in danger from giving birth.

I also never said it was a guaranteed death, so no I’m not going to give you an example where death is a 100% chance. That’s a straight up straw man argument.

2
tholins 2 points ago +2 / -0

C-sections are done all the time for many reasons. They’re usually only done for emergency reasons if something goes wrong during labor, or perhaps if a mother presents with a case severe preclampsia very, very suddenly. Typically, even for severe pregnancy-related health conditions, they’ll induce labor.

My point stand though; an abortion would do nothing to correct the problem in a situation where an emergency c-section is warranteed. The baby would still need to come out. Killing it before extracting it doesn’t save the mother in situations like this.

What I’m getting at here is that there are no medical conditions that can be documented late in pregnancy where an abortion fixes the situation. The life-threatening medical conditions that can develop (of which I don’t think you have any knowledge, which I why I asked the question) are controllable/addressable with proper prenatal care.

There are no conditions that we can know about ahead of time, late in pregnancy, where a woman’s life is in danger and can’t be saved by modern medicine. You can die from hemorrhage, for example, but there’s no way to predict that.

Pregnancy terminations for life of the mother tend to happen in early pregnancy. Again, that would be something like an ectopic pregnancy; these pregnancies are typically non-viable anyway. And BTW, even the Catholic Church recognizes those as valid and not sinful, if the primary purpose isn’t killing the child. Exceptions for situations like those would be appropriate and easy to include in abortion bans.

1
Donger-Lord2 1 point ago +15 / -14

Then close your fucking legs. It’s that simple. You want to murder and genocide children, then you get murdered.

I don’t care if someone got raped. A child shouldn’t be murdered because someone got raped.

And if someone’s life is in danger if they deliver a baby, then do a c-section. I don’t give two fucks for the whores who decide to use abortion as birth control, the ones who encourage murder, like you.

You’re worse than Hitler and Zedong.

4
rangers24 4 points ago +10 / -6

You’re actually fucked in the head holy shit. Your crazy religious views can stay in your own fucked up head, don’t push your fantasy story onto me and other people.

Calling me worse then hitler or mao because I don’t want to see women carrying the baby of their rapist or women dying while giving birth. Wow such a terrible thing, you lunatic

0
3-10 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not worse, but morally the same.

4
T_DforTrump2020 4 points ago +12 / -8

So you want a woman to carry baby full term if she was raped? That 9 month reminder of her rape probably won't help her mental health any. And when I say "prooobably", I meant "definitely".

2
Averon 2 points ago +9 / -7

And being responsible for the murder of an innocent human being is supposed to be good for mental health?

I think you've been brainwashed.

1
Dominion3 1 point ago +4 / -3

All life is precious.

0
Donger-Lord2 0 points ago +5 / -5

I don’t care. Not going to genocide children because someone was raped you neocon faggot.

2
Creepy_Ginger 2 points ago +7 / -5

If you got raped, you don't just sit there and wait anyways. You should be actively going to the doctors for testing and shit. Then they can do it then before anything happens.

Anyways, now you're being very stupid with it. Had me until you want to force women raped to have the children. No fucking thanks weirdo.

-1
SideWinderGX -1 points ago +3 / -4

Oh shut the fuck up with your holier than thou attitude. Honestly people like you deserve a bullet and a shallow grave.

A Hitler comparison, really? You know the argument has no bearing as soon as that is thrown on the table.

-3
Donger-Lord2 -3 points ago +2 / -5

Hitler killed 6-11 million Jews, abortions have killed much more than that you neocon faggot simp. Burn in hell retard.

-1
glasses2020 -1 points ago +4 / -5

You are the reason reasonable conservative moderates with never vote with us and your rhetoric is allowing the murder of more innocent lives to continue because your pride will always get in the way. Congrats on holding the party back.

0
SideWinderGX 0 points ago +4 / -4

You have two upvotes (one is mine, one has to be yours) and two downvotes. You are 100% absolutely spot on about this religious craziness being the sole reason reasonable people avoid the Republican party, and I can't understand why more people don't agree with you on that.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with people.