Newt tried to talk about that, back during his Republican Revolution. He made a comment about orphanages for the children born because of no abortion, and the left attacked him like he was proposing labor factories for children, like in Oliver Twist.
Libs will not listen to anything that helps avoid the need for abortion. Hell, they won't even tell young women who have babies to find love because of abusive parents to not become a single parent at 17. That would require morals, and we know how few libs have.
The solution is a moral society. We're the furthest away from that in the entire history of the USA, and now that it's post-America, we'll go even further adrift.
I ALWAYS agreed with Newt on that but no one has the guts to do what's necessary
EIther as a state create a true safety net for unwanted children or create an adoption system where prospective adopters pay for maternity care, labor, etc
Instead we have rich white, unfertile parents spending 100-500k on ivf...sickening
I don't disagree either. I have some personal knowledge of this, and the problems are even worse after a child is taken into custody by the state, away from unfit parents and women who give their children up at birth. I know a couple who couldn't have kids - she was unable. So they looked into adoption. They spent years applying and being rejected, even though they were a perfect couple - liberal, he made enough she didn't have to work, very educated, intelligent, healthy, nice home, etc. Even as liberals, they're both really nice, pleasant people.
But they were told don't even THINK about a white baby, and they were turned down even for crack babies. They had to leave the country and bribe a South American government to get a little baby girl who was orphaned. The left has the foster/adoption industry on lockdown. Kids spend their entire lives in foster care (and are horrifically abused), with no hope of adoption. It's beyond broken, and insane.
And yes, I think child trafficking is involved. I'd bet quite a few blonde babies have ended up in the Middle East, locked away in harems.
Even when famous people with millions to spend have to go overseas to adopt their virtue signalling children, you know there's a problem. And, as usual, it's liberals with their fucked up brains.
Newt tried to talk about that, back during his Republican Revolution. He made a comment about orphanages for the children born because of no abortion, and the left attacked him like he was proposing labor factories for children, like in Oliver Twist.
Libs will not listen to anything that helps avoid the need for abortion. Hell, they won't even tell young women who have babies to find love because of abusive parents to not become a single parent at 17. That would require morals, and we know how few libs have.
The solution is a moral society. We're the furthest away from that in the entire history of the USA, and now that it's post-America, we'll go even further adrift.
I ALWAYS agreed with Newt on that but no one has the guts to do what's necessary
EIther as a state create a true safety net for unwanted children or create an adoption system where prospective adopters pay for maternity care, labor, etc
Instead we have rich white, unfertile parents spending 100-500k on ivf...sickening
I don't disagree either. I have some personal knowledge of this, and the problems are even worse after a child is taken into custody by the state, away from unfit parents and women who give their children up at birth. I know a couple who couldn't have kids - she was unable. So they looked into adoption. They spent years applying and being rejected, even though they were a perfect couple - liberal, he made enough she didn't have to work, very educated, intelligent, healthy, nice home, etc. Even as liberals, they're both really nice, pleasant people. But they were told don't even THINK about a white baby, and they were turned down even for crack babies. They had to leave the country and bribe a South American government to get a little baby girl who was orphaned. The left has the foster/adoption industry on lockdown. Kids spend their entire lives in foster care (and are horrifically abused), with no hope of adoption. It's beyond broken, and insane. And yes, I think child trafficking is involved. I'd bet quite a few blonde babies have ended up in the Middle East, locked away in harems. Even when famous people with millions to spend have to go overseas to adopt their virtue signalling children, you know there's a problem. And, as usual, it's liberals with their fucked up brains.
It's no different than choosing puppy breeders over adoption. People want their own children. Not ideal but I understand why. It's their money.