This guy really isn’t saying much more than, “I have a lot of fancy degrees and I think these results look fishy.” And it’s hard to tell what “proof” he has actually looked at because of the way this doc has been edited. Not to mention it is two months old and that isn’t clearly stated anywhere on the image.

This weak tea isn’t gonna cut it. If he thinks there are 100k more votes than voters who voted, that means 100k people are listed as votes who never did. We need to find those people and we can start get the ball rolling.