17 Donald Trump's third impeachment lawyer Michael van der Veen 'called him a f***ing crook' and sued him last year arguing the president was trying to suppress mail-in voting (www.dailymail.co.uk) posted 64 days ago by kinbergfan 64 days ago by kinbergfan +18 / -1 10 comments share 10 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (10) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 6 ▼ – deleted 6 points 64 days ago +6 / -0 ▲ 5 ▼ – deleted 5 points 64 days ago +5 / -0 ▲ 4 ▼ – Mrsattorney 4 points 64 days ago +4 / -0 I'm not a litigator and I generally dont like to question other lawyers' tactics, but this is ridiculous. Most of Trump's lawyers have not been impressive and some were downright saboteurs. Look at Michael Cohen ffs! permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 64 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – WhiteLeftistsRGeeks 2 points 64 days ago +2 / -0 At some point it's on President Trump. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – shitposteranonymous 2 points 64 days ago +2 / -0 He needs to quit listening to Jared. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – SweetTeaPatriot 1 point 64 days ago +1 / -0 Why can he never get actual decent lawyers? What is going on??? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Sour_Limey 1 point 64 days ago +1 / -0 I guess that's how little he takes it seriously... permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – FreeFire 1 point 64 days ago +1 / -0 I can easily see a successful counter suit for defamation and malicious prosecution, if not also for violation of his duties as legal counsel. And as for being against mail-in voting, who isn't? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 64 days ago +1 / -0
I'm not a litigator and I generally dont like to question other lawyers' tactics, but this is ridiculous. Most of Trump's lawyers have not been impressive and some were downright saboteurs. Look at Michael Cohen ffs!
At some point it's on President Trump.
He needs to quit listening to Jared.
Why can he never get actual decent lawyers? What is going on???
I guess that's how little he takes it seriously...
I can easily see a successful counter suit for defamation and malicious prosecution, if not also for violation of his duties as legal counsel.
And as for being against mail-in voting, who isn't?