377
Comments (12)
sorted by:
11
Jon888 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's going to be tough to explain away.

8
skatestraight 8 points ago +8 / -0

It was a glitch, move along.

9
GaryJackson 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lol. -7 disklikes. Someone owes this video 7 dislikes. The users who hate this video are in debt to this video's tastelessness.

5
OldGreg 5 points ago +5 / -0

An IOU for dislikes? How in the algorithmic fuck...? 😂🤣

5
Yams_are_better 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ah yes, the -7 bots

4
smartass 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks for the reminder, Just downvoted the last 20 videos published by the Chinese shill fake president and pedophile.

3
Minn2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is technically a way for this to occur without artificial manipulation but the odds of this particular way are so astronomically low you can pretty much write it off as impossible.

To put it simply, if you ever seen a live count on website, such as likes on a Tweet, you may have noticed that it can go up and down a lot. This isn't a bunch people changing their mind, rather it's packages that are sent in particular intervolves that may sometimes conflict with one another (often caused by particular requests, in this case adding a like, to lag or take longer than usual to process), causing the number to go up and down. The same thing happens if when the number isn't incremented live, it's just easier to notice it that way.

This can happen to any counter of anything, including dislikes on YouTube. But for to occur naturally, the following must occur.

  • A whole bunch of people changed their mind and un-disliked within a narrow window of time (and by a bunch, I mean at least a simple majority of them).

  • YouTube sent conflicting packages around the same time due to many of these requests taking longer than usual to process but just so happen to resolve almost synchronously , causing the effect to double up.

  • The person who took this screenshot just happened to be at the right place and time for this to be noticed.

Each of these individually are ludicrous on their own, much less together. I'd also like to mention that packages tend to be the proper count of what's being counted, not a command to add or subtract from the original number, making this even more unlikely.

TL;DR: Yeah, YT got caught.

1
Licensetomeme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nahh, those were Aussie updooters.....

1
Robust_Safeguard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Big tech is coordinating to get any content creators they dont approve off the platform or out of the viewers eyes. They will hinder popular right wing commentators or just people who dont align with their beliefs. Then take people from tiktok or IG and add hundreds of thousands of likes to their videos with 1 or 2 comments. Just check the stories i see it all the time. They think they can fabricate the popular opinion lol

1
Ed_Ward 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't even think they had a graphic designed for negative dislikes.

1
PonySoldier66 1 point ago +1 / -0

have been being altered multiple times.

I'm sorry, I stack faulted.

1
Nowanoutlaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't care never use communist media. Even gtv has less censorship and its Chinese. We have become the world's leader of censorship and its our fault. We know its censored and ask for more. All the money that could be going to sites that don't censore is still going to commie sites because we can't see that the whole up vote thing is a mental game designed thru studies that are using a design that keeps you coming back.