A lot of people aren't realizing how true this is. By every piece of evidence we've seen the only thing he is guilty of is possessing a firearm as a minor. But we're only thinking of the Criminal case.
There are likely to be civil cases. The 2 pedophiles they killed? Their families/estates will sue him. The faggot whose bicep he shot off? same thing. And don't forget the burden of proof for a civil case is much lower than civil. He will likely wind up getting fucked in civil court even when (if?) he wins in criminal.
I'm disappointed that he hasn't pre-emptively sued the estates of the deceased for the financial damage caused to him and his family by their violent assaults.
Except of course, they had no wealth, because that would have come from working for a living and contributing to society.
He will likely wind up getting fucked in civil court even when (if?) he wins in criminal.
I hope not. If nothing else, at that point he'd have nothing to lose.
Hijacking this comment.
A lot of people aren't realizing how true this is. By every piece of evidence we've seen the only thing he is guilty of is possessing a firearm as a minor. But we're only thinking of the Criminal case.
There are likely to be civil cases. The 2 pedophiles they killed? Their families/estates will sue him. The faggot whose bicep he shot off? same thing. And don't forget the burden of proof for a civil case is much lower than civil. He will likely wind up getting fucked in civil court even when (if?) he wins in criminal.
I thought there was just one paedophile.
I'm disappointed that he hasn't pre-emptively sued the estates of the deceased for the financial damage caused to him and his family by their violent assaults.
Except of course, they had no wealth, because that would have come from working for a living and contributing to society.
I hope not. If nothing else, at that point he'd have nothing to lose.