4116
Comments (252)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
177
ProphetOfKek 177 points ago +194 / -17

Lol, he won’t touch that one. His cabal masters want us to be angry but distracted from the real issue: we are ruled, not governed.

Before you downvote, consider this. We used to love Gowdy and Chaffetz, but they both were just blowhard traitors.

93
FreddyFingers 93 points ago +105 / -12

UNIPARTY

They're trying to recover lost ground from the betrayal.

Don't let them have it.

Jimbo, you want to talk about what we remember and won't forget, it's that you are just as compromised as the rest of them.

86
giantrabbit1 86 points ago +91 / -5

Jim contested the electors. He's not swamp.

64
FreddyFingers 64 points ago +67 / -3

Here's a simple test to see who is swamp:

Who is not afraid to utter the following words:

Winnie the Pooh helped steal the US election.

If you find this sentence suspiciously missing from somebody's speech, they're bought and paid for.

22
Deadpool 22 points ago +23 / -1

Best fucking test ever put forward. Make it so.

14
goldkeyboardwarrior 14 points ago +15 / -1

Since 99% of the MSM and social media has banned anybody that continue to rightfully say that the election was stolen, most of these people aren’t going to talk about it anymore unless they want to lose their ability to talk, period.

Can’t drop red pills on Twitter if they delete your post and say you can’t post again until you post some fake retraction claiming that the election was the “safest and most secure in history.”

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
10
Dialectic 10 points ago +11 / -1

Best test ever, especially since most politicians have no problem insulting the American citizen

4
Imransgarage 4 points ago +4 / -0

Man remember the days when it was “radical Islamic terrorism” and trump wrecked that problem?

Missing that guy today.

3
Sir_Girth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yet he’s taken a lot of money from Google.

Curious... 🧐

1
unicornpoop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure he led us all on with questioning big tech on multiple occasions but not doing jack shit.

1
gunteh 1 point ago +4 / -3

Anyone who can talk "freely" but isnt cancelled is controlled opposition.

Gina Carano gets cancelled for a tweet, and Jim Jordan runs his mouth off with no censure or cancellation? Sounds fishy to me.

39
GlacialSpeed 39 points ago +39 / -0

We remember how the 2020 election was stolen in the dead of night

We remember how the media fully ignored and turned away from the overwhelming evidence that 6 US cities produced enough fraud to steal the presidency

We remember that big tech bans anyone discussing the fraud or even talking about the legislative hearings that showed evidence of the fraud

2
BloodDe 2 points ago +2 / -0

What makes you say that

26
theblackprince 26 points ago +27 / -1

Gowdy and Chaffetz were beyond obvious by way of their own actions and words.

Spez: by "beyond obvious" I'm referring to when the both of them gave up in the midst of the most important political war in decades and resigned their positions in the House to be Fox News talking heads.

15
ProphetOfKek 15 points ago +15 / -0

I agree, however, my point still stands. Lots of people in our camp were fooled.

8
sun_wolf 8 points ago +9 / -1

Chaffetz, I never trusted. There is just something wrong with his face. Gowdy was less obvious. He seemed pretty normal and honest during the Benghazi hearings. But then he kept changing his hairstyle every two weeks to the point it couldn’t be ignored. Eventually it got to a point where Gowdy would show up on the TV and it was like, “Dude, what the fuck are you doing with your hair now? You know you’re just feeding Colbert ammunition.” Then he kept defending the FBI. Eventually it was like, nah, something is off with this guy. Now he’s out there looking full on lesbian trans.

Right now Hawley is the one I have my eye on as controlled opposition. Something is off about that guy. People think he is fighting for Trump. I don’t. I think he has been permitted to “fight” for Trump, but he’s really just there to pacify us when we need to be pacified and make us look stupid and combative when we need to look stupid and combative. I actually think the GOPe is laying the groundwork for a fake outsider fake anti-establishment Gaetz-Hawley 2024 ticket. “These two boys are like Trump, without Trump! Look, whatever. Just vote for them you idiots.” We gotta watch on Gaetz with that Guatemalan houseboy he adopted. Shades of Coney-Barrett there. Also isn’t he just a little too slick? And why does the corporate media give him interviews? Why isn’t he blacklisted?

4
ProphetOfKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agree 100%.

With Gaetz, the houseboy thing screamed grooming a kid, and after it started becoming known, he got himself a beard.

With Hawley he was all onboard with the porkulus bill back in December.

2
ProfessorOak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow you summarized my thoughts exactly. I've been liking what Gaetz has been doing lately but I can't shake the feeling that he's agop Trojan horse. He seems to suddenly be acting like what the establishment thinks Trump is like. It comes off as sort of phony to me. Tbf, I never trusted him after he disavowed Trump's assassination of Soleimani.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're forming opinions based on appearance.

Nothing further should need to be said.

Try substance, instead.

GOP is dead, and needs to be buried.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gowdy stated he quit because it was a waste of time, he could do nothing. People here hate him because he could do nothing.

This does not seem intelligent.

2
theblackprince 2 points ago +2 / -0

People hate him because he went to bat for James Comey and the DOJ numerous times, amongst other things. If you don't want to fight, then go away. Don't go to Fox News and cheerlead what you claimed was hopeless for $$$.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sticking up for FBI and DoJ is despicable, I agree. (Reminds of leftists trying to argue FBI and the rest of our IC should be supported as "law enforcement")

It is illogical to dictate that someone moving on from Congress, without term limits being imposed, is somehow bad. Whether they seem to fight for the same cause or not. The sheer number of MAGA principles you violate is staggering!

  1. Freedom. That's a biggie. Whether he went on to do what he said he would or not, his Faux news venture was hardly full time.

  2. Faux news has been irrelevant for a very long time.

  3. Term limits. He didn't enact them across the board, but he did effectively self impose it. This is too big to overlook. I agree 2016 was the time to fight like hell, yet Congress squandered the time.

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

That and his faggy hair changes every other day. He looks like a butch lesbian.

1
Chinese_spy2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gowdy held that shame of a trial on the 2012 Benghazi embassy terrorist attack... He accomplished the impossible: He made Hillary Clinton look good.

9
idea 9 points ago +10 / -1

Gowdy, chaffetz, Jordan, Hawley...they are all just saying what we want to hear while they play the same old game. Even our old darling boy Tucker is pushing the Jan 6th lie.

Trust none of them. Trust no one here.

4
ProphetOfKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sadly, many on here have short memories. Going back to their team. I get it, no one wants to believe they are ruled, people want someone to rally behind. Human nature to want to be plugged back into the matrix.

Edit: and people still thinking we are going to have some kind of revolution? Wake up, DC is a forward operating base. We are disorganized, afraid, love our creature comforts, and untrained. Plus big brother is chomping at the bit to put any of us down who try to organize. I don’t have any answers.

8
dirtbiscuit 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes. And we remember everything these republicans have done for us. wait...

7
45er 7 points ago +7 / -0

Watching fags like gowdy and chaffitz turn and run when trump got elected really opened my eyes.