You can either be a Christian, or you can be wrong. Christ is the truth, and once you look into Him, and I mean truly look at the evidence for Christ, it is undeniable that there is only one right answer. I didn't grow up in a Christian household and fell into Atheism, and on a dare that I couldn't prove Christianity false (because unlike most Atheists I was no coward punk bitch who would hide from proving what I thought was true) and at best I thought I would find superstition and claims with no evidence to back it up. Now I am a devout Christian. There is the truth and then there is not. There is Christ and there is being wrong. The end.
You can either be a Christian, or you can be wrong. Christ is the truth, and once you look into Him, and I mean truly look at the evidence for Christ, it is undeniable that there is only one right answer. I didn't grow up in a Christian household and fell into Atheism, and on a dare that I couldn't prove Christianity false (because unlike most Atheists I was no coward punk bitch who would hide from proving what I thought was true) and at best I thought I would find superstition and claims with no evidence to back it up. Now I am a devout Christian. There is the truth and then there is not. There is Christ and there is being wrong. The end.
None of what you're saying is new or unique.
Looking at all that’s new and unique in our modern culture, that’s not necessarily a bad thing.
I don't think it'd necessarily be bad in any case, just not as weighty or convincing as he'd probably like.