74
Comments (8)
sorted by:
5
sickofaltspin 5 points ago +5 / -0

If fair use was protected like it is supposed to be it wouldn't be an issue. Also, fuck this guy.

5
strictly1957 5 points ago +5 / -0

Even with little actual face showing that is still a face you'd never tire of slapping!

3
marishiten 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ahh, yes. A 1st amendment auditor.

The lowest of the low. Perhaps bigger scum than sovcits.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Chopblock 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are out to crush dissent from any side. Turning you against other people who are also being crushed is a divide and conquer strategy, to keep you from realizing how little the actual difference is between you and him.

“Filthy hippie” - “Deplorable”

Fantasy notion of ‘Democratic Socialism’ - Fantasy notion of ‘Republican Free-Marketers’

Etc. etc...

Attempts to fix the system stymied by opportunists, grifters, infiltrators, and morons

Would happily carve out exceptions and compromises for unique circumstances and common-sense situations

Language used to try to describe problems and address solutions perverted into sloganeering and identity-group signaling

Avenues where chances for success gains momentum transformed into political horse-races

No one will listen to reasoned arguments but emotional contagion-baiting gets some results

Coverage refuses to address opposition’s commonalities and small differences are exaggerated into irreconcilably divides

Hate and anger are pushed instead of building an agreed framework for debate

Public figures and press replace actual arguments with straw-men to criticize

Keeps getting poorer and persecuted while the “elites” keep getting away richer and scot-free

1
LibtardsAreTrash 1 point ago +4 / -3

It is bullshit cops playing music so you can't share videos of them. If they're not up to fuckery recording them shouldn't be an issue. I'm personally tired of powers that be shitting on us with zero accountability. I respected the police until recently. Now they can fuck off. But yeah this guy appears to be a dbag.

1
JerryJerryJerry 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm see no problems with public filming of public servants with a license to kill. I do see this genius needs to brush up on his rights, and direct his ire at, as mentioned, "fair use" somehow not applying to music played by someone else in the background of a video shot in public that has zero commercial impact on said video. Not to mention, it's more free advertising of the music than anything else.

1
trump20202024 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

just wanted to earn money from his stream lol, salty he cant