3509
Comments (99)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
181
Sphien 181 points ago +181 / -0

YES. YES IT DOES.

80
Whoopies_tds 80 points ago +80 / -0

aKtuaLLy, tHAt qUesTiOn iS aNotHeR exaMPle of sYsteMic rACIsm

24
Tinazoebelle 24 points ago +24 / -0

Take a knee when your done with kneeling on that other guys neck

5
spelunking_librator 5 points ago +5 / -0

take a knee and start your career

12
Stefanos 12 points ago +14 / -2

2022 = IMPEACH HARRIS, BIDEN AND OBAMA.
2023 = IMPEACH HARRIS, BIDEN AND OBAMA AGAIN

10
DrBJTester 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is KamelHo indian or black ? Or just a Hoe?

12
independentbystander 12 points ago +12 / -0

She's just a whore. (Referencing the sexual favors she provided Willie Brown and other influential people with very low standards and no regard for the consequences.)

Her father is a descendant of Jamaican slave-owners, her mom is from India (her migrant parents birthed her in the US to reap anchor-baby "status.") She spent much of her childhood in Canada. Kumala is not "African-American," although she flogs the Race Card just as any Angry Black Woman would do.

>Obviously, we're headed for another anti-American Worst 0bama-style shitshow when she seizes the presidency in the near future, complete with executive orders Jugears will deliver on behalf of their financiers. Worst 0bama is probably waiting for SleepyCreepy Biden's dismissal to start showing up at the white house to gloat: as I said previously, Biden is being used to sign the less-popular Leftist Agenda wish-list items, while the more "woke"-friendly executive orders will be saved for Kumala's reign so she can take the credit/revel in the "U GO GURL YAAS SLAY KWEEN" bullshit.

16
thallos 16 points ago +16 / -0

I came here to say this verbatim.

13
WhitePowerRanger 13 points ago +13 / -0

Why answer with words when you can use numbers?

“100%”

7
Hanging_Chad 7 points ago +7 / -0

💯 periodt

13
ActualAdult 13 points ago +13 / -0

Ah, you missed the actual answer.

The prosecution said they weren't aware of those remarks and that they couldn't imagine the Vice President encouraging violence.

The defence expressed astonishment at that, as they'd shown the clip three times already that day as part of demonstrating that it's protected political speech that fails to meet the incitement test.

More relevant to the question was whether treating Trump's words as incitement would create a precedent that would allow impeachment of Harris.

Yes. Yes, it would.

4
Hshsvsvsvsv 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're lying when they say they haven't heard of it Democrats are paid to lie. All democrats. Include the Democrat voters..