3509
Comments (99)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
23
goldkeyboardwarrior 23 points ago +23 / -0

If they convicted Trump in this sham impeachment the next articles of impeachment would need to be for Harris for it.

Whether or not that happens depends on whether or not Nancy wants to be president because we already know she's going to get rid of Biden when he's no longer useful.

16
TheTelltaleFly 16 points ago +16 / -0

There’s no way he stays in office through the SOTU speech 2022, right? He’s not capable of giving a 90 minute speech to a joint session of congress at 9pm. They must have a plan to move him out before then.

10
goldkeyboardwarrior 10 points ago +10 / -0

I just assumed that he would use COVID as an excuse to give it from the Oval Office (where it will be prerecorded and edited) and Kamala would be the one giving the first one in the actual chamber.

A lot of people think they are waiting until 2023 to get Biden out of there so Kamala can still run in 2028 if she wins in 2024. Any earlier than January 21st, 2023, and she can only run once.

5
TheTelltaleFly 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh this is a good point that I had not considered.

3
ohpleaseuhhelpame 3 points ago +3 / -0

She won't win ever!

7
TeeBP 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dominion says otherwise.

5
LibertyPrimeWasRight 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not legitimately, but apparently that doesn't matter.

4
Pierre_Delectoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's nothing saying the speech has to be 90 minutes. And if you watch Barry or Bush Jr.s speeches most of it is them pausing for applause. Trump spent most of his speeches shouting out great Americans, which is something most of Congress won't applaud, so he was unique in talking so long.

They'll prop Biden up for a 30 minute speech they stretch to an hour with applause.

3
TheRedRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can bet on that Wise One

3
FrankDrebin 3 points ago +3 / -0

The GOP are far too gutless to do that.

3
goldkeyboardwarrior 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if 100% of the GOP in the House voted to impeach Kamala, they would need around a dozen Democrats to vote with them. We already know that they aren't going to do it unless there is a political advantage to getting Harris out of the way.

3
whippeat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah. There could be the most blatant hypocrisy in the world, and it wouldn’t matter. Orange man bad. Black/Indian woman good. Even if they say the same thing, he is guilty and she is not.