2338
Comments (298)
sorted by:
228
BarronTrump2032 228 points ago +229 / -1

"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"

172
ProphetOfKek 172 points ago +172 / -0

Dude, it’s been hella infringed for the past 70 years minimum

55
deleted 55 points ago +55 / -0
73
ProphetOfKek 73 points ago +73 / -0

I honestly think they want it. They are totally ready to skin us alive.

55
highenergywinning 55 points ago +55 / -0

Thats why they are ridding the military of conservatives so all thats left will be those lotal to the communists and then they will unleash them on us all

40
ProphetOfKek 40 points ago +40 / -0

Yup. Gotta get the indoctrinated into position. Gonna get ugly, and we are not organized or prepared.

25
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 25 points ago +25 / -0

Well, some are more organized and prepared than others, fren.

21
ModernKnight 21 points ago +21 / -0

If you are not organized or prepared, get to know your neighbors, find like-minded folks, and build trust with each other. Make sure you are all prepared. That won't happen online.

2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

But that takes work!

The people you have to explain what to do to are the ones that will never do it, not only because it requires work but because they are unable to think for themselves in the first place.

11
Ponysoldierpatriot 11 points ago +11 / -0

That is not a bad thing. It is much harder for them to find 75 million lone wolves vs. one giant herd of organized sheep.

2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

It depends. A few million people all going at things from different directions is great to use the thousand cuts method to bring something down, but it's terrible if you're trying to accomplish anything else, like rebuilding afterwards.

7
45orfight 7 points ago +7 / -0

Maybe yes maybe no.

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
10
KarenKarenKaren 10 points ago +10 / -0

Because it’s tone deaf Chinese communists and the RINOS and Dems are just being led around by their noses and money - THEIR OWN MONEY THAT THEY’VE ROUTED THROUGH CHINA. It just makes it all the more ridiculous

6
no_ez 6 points ago +6 / -0

Dear god i wonder what kind of compromat (blackmail) the shadow lords are holding over theses people. Hell, you can bang bang fang fang and have a Chinese spy drive you around for 30 years and not only keep your job— but never apologize for your mistake—because they weren’t mistakes. I honestly believe about 1/5 of congressional democrats have direct communications with CCP and the others are just boot licking, go-with the flow types.

5
GarudaDarkblack 5 points ago +5 / -0

Read this.

https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/what-the-progressive-liberals-have-in-store-for-conservatives

Specifically to your statement read part 4, the section about the military.

https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/what-the-progressive-socialist-liberals-have-in-store-for-conservatives-part-4/

"In most cases, the military is never trusted fully. While often those in power and who instigated the attacks have the backing of the military, it is never 100% guaranteed.

Thus, the military will be used to secure the urban centers, key buildings, structures and roads. Those who are in control will use the military to defend their strong points and only use them for special events when the need is required."

2
D0NNIE_DARK0 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have been looking for this site! It needs to be a stickied post. Though I have some questions about the site and the guy that runs it.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
8
highenergywinning 8 points ago +8 / -0

No but they wont have access to their tanks fighter planes and machine guns anymore though

3
TheBasedFriscoMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don’t think some ex-SFC’s couldn’t retake those armaments?

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
wookiebush 1 point ago +1 / -0

except the specials will fold like a house of cards the moment they meet real resistance.

When they cut and run faster than the French, the hardware will be open to all.

W.

1
bfafpo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ridding the military of conservatives only takes away some of their resources, it does nothing to remove their training. I wonder if loosing thousands of trained, disgruntled conservatives amongst millions of disgruntled masses is kind of shortsighted...

4
Hanging_Chad 4 points ago +4 / -0

And make shoes out of our skins?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
no_ez 3 points ago +5 / -2

Honestly, war is really cool until you’re trying to push the brains back into your friend’s skull... watching his eyes go dark and seeing his body start to reflex as they bleed out.

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
0
no_ez 0 points ago +3 / -3

Alright, Rambo. Meet you in Xiangjang where i’m sure half of the shit in your house and my house both were made by political and ethnic prisoners. We are already living in an occupied country... Most can’t see it yet, but they will. Their new world order will fail. And we’ll never have to lift (or pull) a goddamn finger.

3
Leeboscan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never say never. Not lifting enough is what got us so far into this mess in the first place. Something, something about good men doing nothing....

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
3
Chelsea_hubbell 3 points ago +5 / -2

No one is going to do shit. The same people that say “from my cold dead hands” would have also said they would never stand for draconian shut downs, their kids being ripped away from their friends and school, and mandatory masks. Yet, everyone taking it up the ass, at most grumbling about it.

1
QuantumBogosity 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not how this plays out. Like nazi germany they know to take right away a little at a time. If they raise taxes on semi-automatic rifles it won't cause a revolution but it will price some people out of owning one. They'll register all firearms. Then a year later they'll ban high capacity magazines; "Do you really need more than 20 rounds?". Then they'll ban "assault rifles", "it's ok, I have a walnut stock on my semi-auto rifle"; "you said the world was going to end when they registered all guns and it didn't, so why would it end now? is this the hill you want to die on". The jackboot on your neck doesn't come until all you have is a muzzle loader. They will take little by little and 90% will be too cucked to do anything and the other 10% will not be able to unite to act in unison.

This is the scenario you have to plan for.

27
PapaStonks 27 points ago +27 / -0

Original wording: "Shall not be hella infringed, son". They were wicked east coast.

10
quantum_wetware 10 points ago +10 / -0

"You and your homies better be strapped, you're mad free yo! Deadass, the gov't can't do shit!"

6
PapaStonks 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kek

41
MustafaJones 41 points ago +43 / -2

Imagine trying to restrict ownership of guns when 3D printers exist.

37
trollef 37 points ago +37 / -0

Just wait, even having the files in your computer will be punishable by law, and will be used as an excuse to infringe more and more on people's privacy. 'Common-sense' gun control will morph into common-sense data reporting.

18
KekistanPM 18 points ago +18 / -0

Three words: Encrypted hard drives

16
bubadmt 16 points ago +16 / -0

Look hack, here's the deal. Number ONE--C'MON MAN! Number THREE--PERIOD.

2
TheBasedFriscoMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Number Four - Profit!

8
LibertyPrimeWasRight 8 points ago +8 / -0

If it does turn into common sense data reporting, then encryption would have to become illegal. Since you would be required to report what data you have.

The better solution is just to lose the files in the same boating accident you lost all your guns in.

4
TrumpWonBigly2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

A lot of modern encryption software is designed with back door access for the alphabet agencies. Like almost 99% of it.

If you really want safety you have to download the old versions of software.

1
spezisacuckold 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plausible deniability ❤️❤️❤️

3
StoryTimeHour 3 points ago +3 / -0

doesn't matter for most computers running windows 10

6
CaptainButthurt 6 points ago +6 / -0

You can encrypt the partition via many very secure tools. BitLocker for example. Some even have secret duress mode passwords that will allow you to boot into a fake drive that appears empty. Useful when someone is forcing you.

1
TrumpWonBigly2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah, because any criminal familiar with encryption is really going to believe you have an empty drive.

15
TheRedRight 15 points ago +15 / -0

Gee all those portable external HDD’s were lost in a boating accident.

5
Sumarongi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Your physical, digital and biological identity will merge in the Great Reset. You won’t be able to use a computer unless you give a bio marker. If you download a file that could be used to print a firearm you will be labeled a domestic terrorist, which will be a permanent mark on your digital/bio identity and your computing privileges will be revoked

3
no_ez 3 points ago +3 / -0

And if you’re not really doing it, or doing it well enough not to get caught— they’d just plant the evidence on you anyways.

3
UndeadRevolver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine common sense snitches getting ditches

2
kratomlol 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's already some kind f proposal for doing exactly that. Saw it th other day. Files will be illegal or some shit.

17
TangerineShine 17 points ago +17 / -0

Imagine trying to restrict ownership when people are still armed

18
ProphetOfKek 18 points ago +18 / -0

That’s why the are working to demoralize us and keep us from organizing. I don’t have all the answers, and glowies are everywhere.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
no_ez 3 points ago +3 / -0

“Let them eat Yellow cake.” -Colin Powell, probably

1
QuantumBogosity 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have been successful for 70 years. They won't send out jackboots to collect guns over night; if they did this, they'd have a civil war they can't win. They'll keep taking little by little. They'll register all firearms. A year will pass. High capacity magazine ban. A year will pass, "assault rifle" ban, "just get one with a wooden stock, who cares, it's the same gun anyway, it's just not black". Another year will pass, another restriction will be implemented. There will never be a single, uniting moment where you all rise up toghether unless you create one yourself.

The jackboots don't come until you only have a muzzle loader to defend with. The scenario you have to defeat is the same as the scenario you've failed to defeat the last 70 years, except maybe even more accelerated.

9
BarronTrump2032 9 points ago +9 / -0

3d printers go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

6
DJ_NeckFace 6 points ago +6 / -0

When there are more guns than people...

5
christianknight 5 points ago +5 / -0

Imagine 3D printing files being treated lile child porn and tradcons (with their aggressive pornography policing) helping round up the lawbreakers.

7
BringTheCat789 7 points ago +7 / -0

Good luck with that. The reason possession of child porn can be so strictly enforced is because virtually everyone believes that it is wrong. Sure there are a few crazies who think it's OK, including some in powerful positions, but the vast majority know it is not just wrong, it is one of the worst offenses.

Whereas these firearm laws would only ever have about 50% support. And even the vast majority of the 50% who support the law wouldn't believe possessing these files is anywhere near the same level as possessing child porn.

It just won't happen that way. Not saying they wouldn't start cracking down on it, but there is no way they will be able to crack down on it as hard as they crack down on child porn.

And let's not forget that a lot of the crackdown on child porn is an illusion. It is still out there and it is still viewed by many criminal who go completely uncaught.

Not to mention the child porn that is out there in the open on sites like PornHub (before they banned non-verified content, and probably still some) where the person doesn't necessarily look underage. The equivalent of this would be files that aren't readily firearm files. Things like files to make and airsoft gun that you can "just happen" to make a small modification to make into a working firearm. Or whatever.

4
Joeshmoe91 4 points ago +4 / -0

And exactly what good would those files even be at that point? The whole premise of the 2nd amendment is to prevent the forming of a tyrannical government and subsequent oppression. What fucking good is an AR stuffed in a crawl space under your house? It’s not looking good for us I got news for you. The files don’t mean shit as far as I’m concerned

3
BringTheCat789 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's hard to fight a government with force when times are still relatively good, but I will go out with a fight if I am being forcibly taken from my own home. You can only push a man so far. It's important that men have the tools needed so they can react when pushed too far.

As bad as it seems, it could be much, much worse.

There are only a few things that would make me take up arms personally, and I'm sure most people are in the same boat: a direct threat to my life or the lives of my family.

You may believe it's too late if it gets to that point, but it would start a chain reaction.

2
KarenKarenKaren 2 points ago +2 / -0

When Autism is outlawed then only Outlaws will have autism

2
no_ez 2 points ago +2 / -0

STONKS 2: BROKERS MADE RICHER

2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im talking about legal framework. Its already on the books. All they need to do is add in a clause for other file types.

6
Delta 6 points ago +6 / -0

“BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE”

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Hardcouer 2 points ago +2 / -0

The power to regulate interstate commerce must surely allow a law that anyone engaging in it has to own a gun.

3
christianknight 3 points ago +3 / -0

It has and will be some more. Its time to stop living on denial and face the commie music.

87
WhiskeyDreams 87 points ago +87 / -0

It begins

26
GodDamnedEngineer 26 points ago +26 / -0

YUP. THIS WILL EITHER BE THE FINAL STRAW, OR IT WILL MARK THE BEGINING OF A NIGHTMARE THE WORLD HAS NEVER SEEN.

4
Sumarongi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe both

11
giantrabbit1 11 points ago +24 / -13

Supreme Court has entered the chat. Also, before you say how SCOTUS is compromised, these justices are known for their gun rights/pro 2nd Amendment decisions.

87
Cstriker01 87 points ago +88 / -1

We’ll see...they already sold us to communists soooooo.

17
giantrabbit1 17 points ago +19 / -2

I remember Mazie Hirono was freaking out over Amy's confirmation hearing because she wrote a legal opinion a while back about how the NFA should be struck down. 2nd Amendment is the one thing I can be sure they'll come through on. Roberts also concurred with the majority in DC v. Heller.

32
Dereliction 32 points ago +32 / -0

We no longer live in the world where Roberts concurred in DC v. Heller.

No, I wish I had your confidence but the corruption and evil intent behind all this is so much greater than you give measure.

25
Pierre_Delectoes 25 points ago +25 / -0

7 Justices somehow made the ruling that they had the authority to refuse a case of original jurisdiction (i.e. the Texas lawsuit), which has never been done before and there isn't even any text anywhere to suggest it was an option. They did this on a case with the very highest imaginable stakes (the rule of law and due process). If you take ANYTHING for granted from this bunch of activists, you're a fool.

2
TrumpWonBigly2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm afraid you're delusional and I agree with another's comment so here it is again:

7 Justices somehow made the ruling that they had the authority to refuse a case of original jurisdiction (i.e. the Texas lawsuit), which has never been done before and there isn't even any text anywhere to suggest it was an option. They did this on a case with the very highest imaginable stakes (the rule of law and due process). If you take ANYTHING for granted from this bunch of activists, you're a fool.

6
Rufus_Shinra 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bribes, threats and blackmail rules politics and courts now that the election theft was successful. No one in the federal gov is going to challenge the tyrants in charge now either out of fear or they are in on the corruption.

26
IncredibleMrE1 26 points ago +26 / -0

ACB and Kavanaugh were known for their love of the Constitution and they sold us out over a standing technicality.

5
giantrabbit1 5 points ago +7 / -2

IMO the onus wasn't really on the SCOTUS to correct voter fraud, but rather on the state legislatures, since they had the absolute power to appoint Trump electors according to Article II, and 5/6 legislatures in swing states are controlled by GOP, and 2 of them (AZ/GA) have trifectas. Our Republican state legislatures failed us. They had the absolute power do do something, and they just cucked out and sent the Biden electors anyways.

16
Pierre_Delectoes 16 points ago +16 / -0

The lawsuit didn't ask them to correct voter fraud. It asked them to enforce the due process clause (which is EXACTLY their job) against states violating it. Some states conducting elections illegally disenfranchised Texas voters, who were forced to cast only legal ballots. SCOTUS didn't even have to find there was voter fraud. Nobody asked them to. All they had to do was find that the elections were conducted in accordance with the constitutionally enacted laws.

They refused to even hear it. They are cowards and frauds.

4
TrumpWonBigly2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are traitors

2
TheMAGAlorian787 2 points ago +2 / -0

And it was bullshit to boot.

9
AbrahamLincoln 9 points ago +9 / -0

They're also known for standing by while communists overthrew our government.

4
christianknight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are also known for ties to the Bush clan.

2
SCP0073 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, that was before riots tho. Apparently, riots allow rights to cease existing. Who knew?

3
20KAG20 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well this make me put down the money on a binary trigger. Buy now, while you can.

1
WhiskeyDreams 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do it. They are great.

1
20KAG20 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did. Should have it next week.

1
WhiskeyDreams 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should have a nice long range ar with a two stage and a nice short range ar with a quick fire trigger. I hope you have both brother!

2
20KAG20 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do. 4 custom built ARs; 18”, 16”, 10.5”, and 7” ready to roll. Plus an AK. Yeehaw

The binary is going on a Ruger 10/22 that I’m building though. Wanted something fun to shoot without caring about the ammo.

2
WhiskeyDreams 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am very jealous of your 7 and 10.5. Those aren’t legal where I am...

50
Trump2020MAGA 50 points ago +50 / -0

I'd hate to be on the wrong side of that.

47
Aambrick 47 points ago +47 / -0

So anyone else get the idea to take names of these groups, and the people and organizations attached as well?

13
Toughsky_Shitsky 13 points ago +13 / -0

Keeping the names for future reference.

Take a free man's right to defend himself and you've made an enemy akin to a cornered badger.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
38
jubyeonin 38 points ago +38 / -0

Guns are the least of our worries. We'll be outnumbered by migrants.

18
TheMAGAlorian787 18 points ago +18 / -0

I think you mean illegal aliens.

5
jubyeonin 5 points ago +5 / -0

No. They will use the front door.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
14
Britas 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yep 25,000 set to be let in by DHS

4
Pierre_Delectoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't worry, if we descend into civil war, they'll just keep walking up to Canada or they'll stop coming at all. They are here for the gibs. No gibs, no come.

1
FuckATF 1 point ago +1 / -0

Target rich environment

36
DefineTheLine 36 points ago +39 / -3

Something something boat accident. Now you don’t have to read the comments

55
sleepinggiant 55 points ago +59 / -4

Thats not how that works.....theyll eventually come to your house....theyll eventually beat the information out pf you, your wife, and/or your children....youll give them up.

This has played out before shortly before the killing starts. Gun grab is go time, its the last time youll be able to put up an effective fight.

44
rbnhd76 44 points ago +44 / -0

If it's time to hide them, it's time to use them.

Not condoning violence, hopefully they obey the Supreme law of the land.

10
Shayhawk 10 points ago +10 / -0

Like when they obeyed the law that says "THOU SHALL NOT STEAL A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION"?

Yeah they don't give a fuck about laws anymore fren.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
Pierre_Delectoes 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah I know this is the oldest joke in the boomer book, but its long past time for joking. No authorities are going to take your word for it. They aren't even going to ask. The first you'll hear about it is them kicking your door in on a no-knock warrant when you fail to turn your gun in at a mandatory take-back (there will be no buyback) facility within the allotted time. They will arrest you, ransack your house and take everything. You'll then be put in jail for the rest of your life (or just put in a boxcar if we're further down the line).

If gun bans pass and there isn't mass violence that same day in response, you'd better take your guns and run for the border because they'll come for you.

7
Donarudo_Taranpu 7 points ago +8 / -1

I'll die in a pile of brass. I hope they don't send bachelors. Send them ones with families so they can suffer like they plan to make my family suffer.

2
BroadSunlitUplands 2 points ago +3 / -1

It won’t go down how fantasists imagine it will go down. They aren’t going to turn up with lights flashing and let each house turn into the Alamo. People will be jumped in the street, or at work, or wherever they are exposed and vulnerable, by unmarked Gestapo, and be overwhelmed and detained before they know anything is happening. Maybe 1/10 will be fast enough to get their hand to a gun, and maybe 1/10 of those will survive the attempt long enough to get a shot off. Then their property will be searched.

The time to start fighting is when they start building an illegitimate and unelected power structure which will conduct all of this, which is already happening.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
Johnfox13 6 points ago +6 / -0

Owning one requires the intention. Otherwise it is like buying a helicopter in case you need to use it but not ever planning on learning the controls, the safety, etc

And if you don’t prepare the intention beforehand it will screw you up mentally. Even afterwards anecdotally it seems to affect people differently.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
36
ObviatingTyranny 36 points ago +36 / -0

If it is time to hide them, it is time to use them.

Problem isn't guns, or being violent or killing people.

Problem is how many people are willing to be killed for their beliefs?

Doesn't mean you want to, or that it's going to happen, but you have to have the mindset that at certain points you are willing to be killed.

That is what frees you.

That is why faith is so important, IMO as well. I am certain I will die. This lifetime is a drop of water in the ocean of eternity.

4
Cstriker01 4 points ago +4 / -0

True.

14
Britas 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yea they will go after the ammo and gun manufacturers first. You can't shoot if you got no ammo bud.

5
BringTheCat789 5 points ago +5 / -0

While this is their best course of action if they wanted to actually do something... so far they're too stupid to realize this, so don't give them ideas. I'm not sure if they're truly just ignorant about guns (probably, considering how clueless they sound when they speak about guns, or even when they write legislation about them) or if they purposely only go after firearms because they know it will win brownie points with their supporters and they don't really care about the results either way.

It's crazy how few liberals realize that a gun is just a hunk of plastic and metal. And that all it needs to do nowadays is put a dent into a piece of metal and give a place for the bullet to go. All the advancements in firearms throughout the years are really within the ammo. Once the modern cartridge was figured out, all the huge advancements in firearms became "obvious."

With that said: if they do ban ammo, all hope is not lost for those of us DIYers.

Even in Europe, one can obtain the items necessary to make your own ammo. There exists nail guns that use what are essentially blanks to drive nails into concrete.

For more info, please look up ButWhatAboutAmmo on CtrlPew

8
Montanan 8 points ago +8 / -0

FYI, an AR-15 weighs as much as 10 moving boxes and shoots a .50 cal bullet.

5
Pierre_Delectoes 5 points ago +5 / -0

They are going after the ammo. Remington is bankrupt. Magpul and WInchester aren't in great shape either. All they need to do is pass a law allowing ammo and gunmakers to be sued when someone is killed with their products. They'll be out of business in a week. The government will nationalize a few of them to ensure weapons for the military and that's the end of civilian gun ownership.

Also, good luck making your own ammo without powder or primers. You might be able to bodge some ghetto primers and powder together with other chemicals, but it'll be like meth very quickly where even the products that can be used to make it will be banned or require registration and limits on purchases.

2
BringTheCat789 2 points ago +2 / -0

even the products that can be used to make it will be banned or require registration and limits on purchases

But this isn't the case in Europe. You can buy blanks to use in Ramset style nail guns which are a primer and main explosive. You can also buy spent casings.

Regulating the stuff needed to make a primer would be difficult. Matches can be used to make a reliable primer fairly easily.

And regulating powder in the US would be incredibly difficult legally. I simply don't foresee that happening in our lifetime. After that, anything could happen, but you can only worry so far ahead. A regulation on gun powder would be a hugely sweeping regulation as it would affect even the "muskets" that they say the 2nd amendment was written for.

It definitely won't happen in the next 2 years. While the dems have a senate majority, a single dissenter would prevent a law from passing. In this case, look into Senator Tester from Montana. He's a democrat, but he has voted against universal background checks in the past. So he's some level of hope.

1
Pierre_Delectoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can buy ramset cartridges in Europe because there are few guns so people using them to create ammo is not much of a concern. Anyone who can procure a gun there likely can procure ammo.

That's not the case in the US where guns are very widespread. If the government was making a push to disarm us, they would absolutely shut off the flow of primers and powder in any and all forms. Yeah, it would be illegal, but if they've decided to disarm people, they clearly don't care anymore.

1
BringTheCat789 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just don't expect that to happen in our lifetimes. Heavily regulating ammunition down to the components needed to create it would be incredibly sweeping and nearly impossible to pass.

1
havemydata 1 point ago +1 / -0

The government actually owns a lot of the factories and they lease it to companies. They can revoke leases and take billions of rounds of the market in an instant.

5
streakybacon 5 points ago +6 / -1

Doesn't strike me as much of a solution, having to "lie" to appease a tyrannical government.

3
lixa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah incidentally trained dogs can smell them. Even buried in the ground. Even in ziplock bags even sitting in coffee. If you have some known significant arsenal they’ll probably find them unless they aren’t there.

2
otistoole 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will use metal detector wands

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
31
MagaHippie88 31 points ago +32 / -1

...... no steppy...... hiss hiss.... <3 MAGA2021

9
DJ_NeckFace 9 points ago +9 / -0

****FACE TOWARDS ENEMY

25
deleted 25 points ago +28 / -3
18
Britas 18 points ago +18 / -0

They are also planning to legislate manufacturers so that any criminal use of fire arms can be blamed on gun makers...

18
deleted 18 points ago +24 / -6
13
Pierre_Delectoes 13 points ago +13 / -0

It could be fixed within a few years if the right people were killed and the right people put in charge, but there's no realistic scenario besides a military coup where that happens. A full-scale civil war would result in foreign military intervention. If the crooks in DC looked like they could actually fall, China and probably half of the EU would be here within 24 hours to assist on the justification that they can't let the USA's nuclear weapons fall into the hands of "white supremacists."

So the only way it happens is if the government is deposed and replaced within a day or two, which is only realistically happening if the military does it.

Which is why Biden's new DoD stooge, fresh off retirement after arming ISIS, is making purging patriots from the military priority #1.

7
Donarudo_Taranpu 7 points ago +7 / -0

This guy gets it. That whole "behind every blade of grass" thing works for advantage when were fighting amongst ourselves or the Imperial Japanese Army.

We'll be up against our own Communist insurrectionists, backed up by China and the UN, the whole globalist world army will arrive at lightning speed and people like us will be exterminated.

Honestly, globalists probably want a scenario like this to play out. Toppling the world's number one super power is at the top of their agenda.

8
BurgerChef90 8 points ago +8 / -0

Might as well make it where DUIs can be blamed on the brewery/distillery and car accidents be blamed on the car manufacturer

Hell, might as well make it where any death involving any item, is the responsibility of the company who made said item. You get killed by a Serta mattress? Serta is responsible.

But, I don't except anything less from the people who blame everyone else for everything.

2
VoidWanderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's similar to the "my body, my choice" is only ever entertained when it comes to killing a child. "The company is liable" is only ever going to be held up against gun and ammo manufacturers.

5
Magastreammedia 5 points ago +5 / -0

But isn't there precedent when they tried to sue Remington or whomever for sandy hook? The precedent being that it can't happen?

4
Britas 4 points ago +4 / -0

PLCAA - Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, is what currently protects arms manufacturers from being sued for 99% of cases. Biden plans to repeal that act and make it viable to go directly after the weapons manufacturers.

Also killing that business in the process, the commercial weapons market in the US is huge, this would make the oil pipe business look like a small time cut. Make no mistake democrats are going hard to remove guns from citizens hands.

6
Magastreammedia 6 points ago +6 / -0

Which makes you wonder if that happens, could I sue Chevy, apple, and Jack Daniels for a drunk driver who was texting that crashed into and killed my daughter?

2
Lazy8 2 points ago +2 / -0

This!!!! I don't hear many talking about this but this will KILL firearm manufacturers and ammo. This will make it impossible to have guns made

6
TheRedRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Denied based on Voting record and social media posts.

4
milktoastfencesitter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Slowing down the background check processing is another way to “ban” guns without actually banning them. Also imposing a license fee per gun which requires regular updating. Canada does this is and even with legal guns it limits how many a person wants to own.

South Africa discovered you don’t need to ban something to get what you want. Just regulate the hell out of it.

3
nutup_orshutup 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stock up now. Pass them out like party favors later.

23
whippeat 23 points ago +23 / -0

Need sanctuary states for gun laws

25
TangerineShine 25 points ago +25 / -0

No we are already a sanctuary country for guns. Come get some, commie invaders

16
BringTheCat789 16 points ago +16 / -0

The USA is supposed to be a sanctuary country for gun laws. That's the whole point.

22
consumptiveballerina 22 points ago +22 / -0

Don't you kind of wish a motherfucker would?

12
TangerineShine 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes, this is the moment we have all been waiting for. I really do wish

19
Realamericansrslyguy 19 points ago +20 / -1

Press "x" to doubt

18
Smdlegend 18 points ago +18 / -0

That alone should spur most dems who were on the fence. But still can't get around that fucking Georgia....

1
guitarmastershredder 1 point ago +19 / -18

What fucking Georgia? I’m from Georgia... what did you want us to do, civil war get killed and arrested, bomb a building or two, kill a senator or two? What the fuck did you want us to do....? They kicked everyone out and our government betrayed us... no one will come down here and help us civil war so what is your suggestion sir???

11
christianknight 11 points ago +12 / -1

The trees can talk.

2
guitarmastershredder 2 points ago +4 / -2

What’s that even mean?

6
DiscoverAFire 6 points ago +7 / -1

It means don't say things that will get you arrested.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
UpTrump 8 points ago +11 / -3

Doooooom

7
Bbasher 7 points ago +9 / -2

No he has a point. What do you want us to do? Everything we tried did not work and our own Georgia TOP house and Senate did not listen to us.

5
posedgeclk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Recall Kemp. You have to go through Raffenspooger to do it, and the timer starts ticking once the initial paperwork has been filed. I will gladly collect signatures and addresses if a party with experience in this gets the ball rolling.

5
GiveMe1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes to all of that, should’ve been done and we wouldn’t have needed a run off. The minute they were kicking poll watchers out, you should’ve been there with gun in hand forcing them to be let in. Every pede in every city where they did that shit allowed it to happen.

yes I will come down tomorrow if you kick civil war off tomorrow. I’ll tell my wife I need to go fight for this country and she will understand. Grow balls

Traitors dying is the only way this country is fixed

1
Montanan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes!

15
Untenablemorass 15 points ago +15 / -0

Fuck all this

I'm not going along with any of this

10
TheMAGAlorian787 10 points ago +10 / -0

Mother fuckers. Remember, gun safety really means gun confiscation. They don’t give a shit about gun violence, if they did, they would push for harsher sentences and bail for violent offenders! Instead, they raise bail money for them and try to take MY rights away.

5
Alaskan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Under rated comment.

10
ColbyP 10 points ago +10 / -0

Unlikely. The files to 3d print guns are freely available. It doesn't matter what laws they pass now, they already missed their chance. You can't stop the signal.

7
DiscoverAFire 7 points ago +7 / -0

"The internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it"

1
Pierre_Delectoes 1 point ago +1 / -0

3D printed guns are mostly breach loading, single-shot handgun style guns that can only handle low pressure loads, or require conventionally made metal internals. They also lack rifling in many cases. They are not what you want to go into battle with against people using real guns.

Also, good luck 3D printing primers and powder.

Good luck printing anything at all really. If they go after guns, DRM on 3D printers that automatically blocks printing of any problematic files is going to happen too. The same way we have bots looking at streaming content to issue DMCA notices, we'll have algorithms in your printer looking for gun-like parts.

1
posedgeclk 1 point ago +2 / -1

Good luck printing a bolt or firing pin with a desktop printer.

4
Montanan 4 points ago +5 / -1

I think the old saying my dad was fond of, had something to do with a will and a way.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
TheRedRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

You Ha ent been to Oregon have you?, FFS...it’s full of them and they stink like pigs hit and growth hormones

6
PaigeAshley 6 points ago +6 / -0

All they have to do is make ammo impossible to get and they've won. :(

3
BringTheCat789 3 points ago +3 / -0

While this is their best course of action if they wanted to actually do something... so far they're too stupid to realize this, so don't give them ideas. I'm not sure if they're truly just ignorant about guns (probably, considering how clueless they sound when they speak about guns, or even when they write legislation about them) or if they purposely only go after firearms because they know it will win brownie points with their supporters and they don't really care about the results either way.

It's crazy how few liberals realize that a gun is just a hunk of plastic and metal. And that all it needs to do nowadays is put a dent into a piece of metal and give a place for the bullet to go. All the advancements in firearms throughout the years are really within the ammo. Once the modern cartridge was figured out, all the huge advancements in firearms became "obvious."

With that said: if they do ban ammo, all hope is not lost for those of us DIYers.

Even in Europe, one can obtain the items necessary to make your own ammo. There exists nail guns that use what are essentially blanks to drive nails into concrete.

For more info, please look up ButWhatAboutAmmo on CtrlPew

1
catvideos3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read HR 127

2
BringTheCat789 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have read it.

Firstly, the ammo restrictions aren't the "main" objective. My point was that the idiots liberal never argue explicitly for ammo regulations, it's always about banning "assault weapons."

Secondly, as restrictive as it is, it doesn't seem to ban materials to make ammo. So it's hardly that debilitating. If it passes, I foresee gun shops simply replacing their shelves of ammo with shelves of casing, powder, primers, and bullets.

And thirdly, that bill is not going anywhere.

5
WilliamJoy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fascists!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Vashts1985 5 points ago +5 / -0

Missouri just voted to ignore all federal gun laws.

talk to your local governments. get this done in your states.

5
RealityKnocking 5 points ago +5 / -0

r/liberalgunowners surpriced pikachu face

2
yurimodin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't fucking stand that shithole.

4
SodaCracker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Texas will become a Gun Sanctuary State.

3
TheRedRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Texas will have another Alamo if this keeps up, along with many other states

4
Caulder1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tennessee re-enters the chat

-1
christianknight -1 points ago +2 / -3

Not possible. Many states nullified federal gun laws but nobody is going to risk getting a visit from the alphabet boys who have jurisdiction in all 50 + a "so whatever I want" badge.

4
TrumpTrainChoooChoo2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not true, Missouri (forget what county) told their local sheriffs to arrest federal officers if they try to confiscate guns. Nonetheless, this is scary but the approach that the Missouri county took is the right one, local sheriffs needs to stand up for 2A and arrest federal officers if they intend on disobeying the constitution.

3
christianknight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now we wait and see if anyone tries to drill some third holes.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any more info on this county in Missourie?

3
Pierre_Delectoes 3 points ago +4 / -1

All they need to do is decriminalize assault or murder of federal officers engaged in enforcement of laws not recognized by that state. See how many alphabet boys want to knock on doors in Texas if the gun owner can send them to hell without any legal issues.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is definitely wishful thinking. Id wager secession would happen before that and we know that won't happen either.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
8
Spezz 8 points ago +8 / -0

we are in a different world than 2009, a different level of corrupt elitists

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
4
BigLove 4 points ago +4 / -0

And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?

-Alexander Solzhenitsyn

4
nickybops 4 points ago +5 / -1

We are accelerating faster than expected.

4
Sarsen1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

Take a look at The National Association for Gun Rights. They apply punishment (upset and vocal voters) to make the shithead politicians vote as they are told. It's fun to watch!

4
SwampKraken 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’d love nothing more than to tango with tyranny.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
KARURUKA2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Y’all better be ready cuz they are coming. Mark my words

3
GarudaDarkblack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Read all 4 parts. Once they disarm us they will take a breather, a month or so, then they will come and kill us. Know your history.

https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/what-the-progressive-liberals-have-in-store-for-conservatives

3
JohnParker1 3 points ago +3 / -0

This has nothing to do with gun safety. It's a gun grab. It will only affect law abiding gun owners. The majority of gun violence is committed by people who have already been banned from owning fire arms. They just get them in the black market. Remember Fast and Furious? Those are guns that were sold to the drug cartels south of the border by the Obama administration. A lot of them ended up back here, killing U.S. citizens, including a border patrol agent. KEEP YOUR GUNS.

3
GarudaDarkblack 3 points ago +3 / -0

When SHTF don't expect to be able to communicate online, not even with a VPN, Tor, or encryption. They are already preparing for that.

https://odysee.com/@RobBraxmanTech:6/firewall:d?r=FeugoQiM3FQBwrUFzLLDraLKSraixvP9

3
tokenninja 3 points ago +3 / -0

From my cold dead hands.

3
Shmioighan 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a great set up for a good short one liner counter. We could use some far less wordy and more direct politics.

"You'll try" "Molon Labe" "Send the ones you won't miss."

3
USAMIKE 3 points ago +3 / -0

I. WILL. NOT. COMPLY.

3
wookiebush 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they come to take your guns illegally, give them the ammo first.

Too bad for me, I had that unfortunate canoe accident last year.

W.

2
Minn2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you think about it, this literally means nothing.

If Swampy Biden can lie about stimulus checks, then why can't he lie about this? I'm not saying it is, but it's highly possible that this is just pandering.

2
yurimodin 2 points ago +2 / -0

80% lowers, keep your mouth shut, do what you want.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BS2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

THE PEOPLE will reassure Grandpa Joe they wont abide by their controls

2
TrumpWonBigly2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

The white house can go fuck themselves because no one will comply and they better send faggot bachelors.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
RyanUpCreek 2 points ago +2 / -0

The WH ambitions which means ambush, I mean come and get them when you pass the thing. I know the thing word for word. It says 4 simple words, Shall Not Be Infringed.

2
yudsfpbc 2 points ago +2 / -0

After all, gun owners across America have offered him to "come and take them" and to deliver the ammunition via express delivery methods with the gunpowder safely burned off in an appropriate gunpowder burning device.

2
HTTP_404 2 points ago +2 / -0

COLD. DEAD. HANDS.

2
Muttsbitetoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m just here for the peaceful comments.

2
HTTP_404 2 points ago +2 / -0

COL. DEAD. HANDS.

2
Sylvester1212 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gun control is racist. They only care about gun control when white kids are getting shot. Please pass it along so everyone knows anyone for gun control is a racist.

2
grndmrshlgando 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bring it on mother fuckers

2
QuantumBogosity 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you plan for the wrong scenario you will lose. They will not just suddenly ban all guns and abolish 2A and go from door to door collecting all rifles; that's not how this is going to play out.

They will never intentionally give you a single large focal issue to unite on. They will register all firearms; and there's enough cucks that will agree and excuse this that if there is an armed uprising they will be much too few to do anything; and they will be arrested and serve as a warning example.

A year will go by. Then they will ban "assualt rifles" and enough cucks will agree to this and excuse it; saying "I don't have an 'assault rifle' mine has a walnut stock", "last time you said the world would end when they registered guns and it didn't, why should I believe you know?".

Then they'll ban "high capacity magazines". And "it's OK, you can still have 20 round magazines; do you really need more than 20?".

The people who go door to door and draging people out into the streets won't come until all you're allowed to have is a muzzle loader.