2610
No 50/50! (media.communities.win)
posted ago by PaigeAshley ago by PaigeAshley +2610 / -0
Comments (105)
sorted by:
45
realPhantomFuck 45 points ago +46 / -1

Top 5 President right there!

24
BloodElfSupporter 24 points ago +25 / -1

Top 5 being the Rushmore 4 + Trump?

It’s funny how in the best five none are Democrat.

17
FabsMagicHat 17 points ago +18 / -1

Personally I like JFK but he wouldn’t be a Democrat today

1
JimzeBMk1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me too, after all, it's all about "what your country can do for you" now - just gimme, gimme, gimme, free stuff for all!

6
StillplayenSometimes 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's very cool.

1
pente1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

i took the isthmus

... yes, yes you did.

-38
NullifyAndSecede -38 points ago +6 / -44

No, he literally set the precedent that the federal government can rob the citizenry blind by executive order: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

He outlawed the private ownership of gold by executive order, forced a buyback and this started the steep downfall of the value of the dollar from there.

One of the worst presidents ever.

36
CaptainButthurt 36 points ago +36 / -0

Wrong Roosevelt..n

6
NullifyAndSecede 6 points ago +8 / -2

Oh whoops

3
VoltronGreen1981 3 points ago +3 / -0

Derp. lol.

23
RuthlessGravity 23 points ago +24 / -1

Hold up, are you talking about Teddy or the crippled faggot in a wheelchair?

21
Donger-Lord2 21 points ago +21 / -0

He’s thinking of the crippled faggot in a wheelchair. I spit on his grave whenever I go to his home in Hyde Park.

9
CuomoisaMassMurderer 9 points ago +9 / -0

This had me confused too. Wrong guy.

2
Highspergamy 2 points ago +2 / -0

He also wrote a book at the behest of cosmopolitan people call A Nation of Immigrants, and introduced the concept that America is supposed to be a "melting pot" into the public discourse.

1
realPhantomFuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're an idiot

25
Groundpounder 25 points ago +25 / -0

We need Teddy back. The monopolies have taken over again.

20
MikesBigJockstrap 20 points ago +20 / -0

They shot him in the chest, he gave a speech with a bullet in his lung, then walked into the hospital.

22
Groundpounder 22 points ago +22 / -0

And he challenged soyboy smack-talkers to the boxing ring if they gave him any lip 💋 🥊

15
MikesBigJockstrap 15 points ago +16 / -1

Also he had a pet bear.

14
Groundpounder 14 points ago +15 / -1

That dude rocked. The entire White House was one big trophy room full of mounted kills.

-9
germancuckpede -9 points ago +1 / -10

wow so brave, white man goes into the forest and shoots defenseless animal from 100 meters away, I admire such strong and wild men.

6
Groundpounder 6 points ago +6 / -0

Teddy was tough enough to take them out with a knife, but didn’t like to show off 😎 (Or is that not allowed either... teeth and nails only?)

4
RichardNoggin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did you skip your soy latte enema this morning? Bit cranky

0
germancuckpede 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh I don't like going to McDonalds or Walmart eating 10 pound garbage hamburgers every day so obviously I must be some fag soy drinker.

19
Prussian_Pepe 19 points ago +19 / -0

Fun fact do you know WHY the guy shot him in the first place? Because the MEDIA made a hit piece, that because he was running for a 3rd term he was "GOING TO DESTROY THE COUNTRY". The shooter was a schizophrenia, who believed the news papers and thought he had to save the country from the evil Teddy man.... So yes, fake news, from 100 years ago, pushing the crazies to try to kill the president. Nothing new under the sun....

5
Hardcouer 5 points ago +5 / -0

He was up at the podium running as a third party candidate. His party was called the Bull Moose Party. When he was shot, as an expert hunter, he concluded that he had only taken a minor flesh wound and that the bleeding was slow. He got up and away from the officials who had gathered around, and declared, "Ladies and Gentlemen: It takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose!"

4
Index 4 points ago +5 / -1

"Friends, I shall ask you to be as quiet as possible. I don’t know whether you fully understand that I have just been shot; but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose."

3
Hardcouer 3 points ago +3 / -0

I bet you could hear a pin drop for the rest of the speech.

4
Former_Libtard 4 points ago +4 / -0

What? No pink haired hecklers?

12
Donger-Lord2 12 points ago +12 / -0

This time they are backed by commies. We need Trump and Teddy to smash their skulls in.

9
Groundpounder 9 points ago +9 / -0

Imagine that ticket? Getting a tingle down my leg 😄

6
THE_MAGAL0RIAN 6 points ago +6 / -0

I could see this becoming a comic book. It can debut with “Teddy bear and Trumpy bear take down big tech!” followed by “Teddy bear and Trumpy bear take the commies for a scenic helicopter ride!”

1
no_ez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah more Teddy Roosies and less Teddy Ruxpin. Talking point tapes inserted to animatronic politicians.

2
Groundpounder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Syntax errors everywhere 🤪

17
Everquest4Life 17 points ago +17 / -0

No more hyphenations.

No more flags for every identity box you check off.

1 Flag. 1 People. The UNITED States of America.

E Pluribus Unum. Out of many, One.

Those who disagree should be laughed out of the spotlight and barred from holding any type of political office to represent the American people.

4
Forbidden_outcast 4 points ago +4 / -0

It also helps to either refuse to check nationality and race boxes, or check them incorrectly.

Any information they obtain has been proven that they will use it against the American people.

So make their information obtained not worth a $.01.

Refuse every single bit of it. Race, sex, religion, prior status- anything you can think of. Refuse to be a statistic used to take down the country in which you live.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
12
ravioli_king 12 points ago +12 / -0

Teddy is legendary, yet at the time he was utterly hated by both parties. He fell into the VP and fell into the Presidency. He was also shot on the campaign trail and still did an hour long speech, because you can't let those who would hinder you win.

14
Prussian_Pepe 14 points ago +14 / -0

The unfortunate part is that was during his "Bull Moose" party run. After he had recommended his VP Taft for the presidency, Taft turned out to be a corrupt lobbyist POS, so he tried to run against him. Creating the Bull Moose party though, split the conservative vote. Most of the people voted for him, the corrupt republicans voted for Taft, which allowed that Mongrel idiot Wilson to win with only 42% of the popular vote. And then he screwed the country over forever by making the Federal Reserve and enslaved the nation to the banking guild.

Wilson never should of won, and is one of the roots of all the evil we are fighting and dealing with to this day. Teddy had to fight against FAKE NEWS, and corrupt establishment. And even though he did better with his own 3rd party than anyone else in US history, beating the GOP in the election, it came at a cost. There are a lot of lessons to be learned from all the backstabbing that was done at the time.

1
Bonsil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't the bull moose party one of those progressive parties??

6
StillplayenSometimes 6 points ago +6 / -0

Biden would rather get shot than have to talk for an hour

11
Radicallymoderate 11 points ago +14 / -3

Dual citizenship...

5
Liberty_Prime 5 points ago +6 / -1

Eligibility for citizenship is not citizenship.

9
Ez_mac 9 points ago +9 / -0

If you take a look at TR’s rhetoric it is shockingly similar to Trump. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/585889/theodore-roosevelt-insults

9
Viewer01 9 points ago +9 / -0

Man's loyalties by priority.

  1. religion.
  2. family.
  3. community.
  4. state.

I could pontificate about how the state has been attacking each and every facet of these.

1
FreedomFromGovt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Consider, instead:

  1. Self.

  2. Family.

  3. Religion (like-minded fellowship beyond the family).

  4. Community.

  5. State.

I suggest this because it's the 'Natural Order' of one's priorities; and, because it runs contrary to the left's longstanding obsession with creating the 'New Soviet Man', who is propagandized to consider the self (or 'self-interest') as something inherently evil to be suppressed.

They worked to invert the psyche of their 'New Soviet Man' to place the interests of anonymous 'others' (normally at the periphery of one's existence) first, and his own welfare and interests last.

In other words, leftists wanted to undo 5 million years'-worth of human evolution in order to build a gray, selfless, and anonymous drone whose engineered altruism would have him work tirelessly in service to the state, without a moment's consideration for himself and his own welfare. --Like modern-day serfdom, but better!, because he would feel virtuous in his enslavement since he'd be doing it for a good cause.

Central to Klaus Schwab's "Great Reset" movement is the rescussitation of plans to build the latest New Soviet Man 2.0.

2
Viewer01 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem with religion being #3 is how do you explain honor killings? Christians disowning gay children, etc?

1
FreedomFromGovt 1 point ago +1 / -0

The content of each religion's philosophy is not relevant here.

I'm speaking about the concentric circles of social affiliation, beginning with one's self at the center of his identity and primacy of importance. From there, he's next concerned with his family; then his religious community; then the wider community (his town or city); and then, finally, his state.

The left wants to invert this natural order so as to create a completely selfless worker drone who has no sense of his own wants, hopes, or ambitions. He would live completely in the service of nameless, faceless "others". We see evidence of the left's fixation on "otherism" right now with the mask mandate. One of their inducements is: "do it for others".

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
8
AmericanPatriot6f0 8 points ago +8 / -0

The lukewarm will be spit out

2
D0NNIE_DARK0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amen

6
FarangHamYai 6 points ago +8 / -2

My Jewish friend always says he's Jew first, American second.

5
NerBolanski 5 points ago +6 / -1

It is lunacy to expect Jews to assimilate at a high rate. Their sense of nationhood is always either to a foreign land or a global ideology or cosmopolitan lifestyle.

2
Liberty_Prime 2 points ago +7 / -5

A lot of Christians are God, family, country. Why would another faith be different?

5
Farage_massage 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because “Jew” isn’t antithetical to “American”. It doesn’t make sense as a statement, and points to someone perhaps inferring that they may align with the “Jewish homeland” more than America - which would be problematic.

-5
Liberty_Prime -5 points ago +1 / -6

The Catholic Homeland is Italy.

Would you worry about someone's loyalty to the Vatican overruling their Americanism? Why do you reserve these concers for people of different faiths that basically say the same thing? GOD COMES FIRST.

Besides. This whole dual citizenship is a bullshit trope anyway. Saying Jews have dual citizenship because they're eligible for citizenship in Israel is like saying everybody who's taller than 4.5 feet has ridden every rollercoaster in America...because they're tall enough to ride the ride.

8
Farage_massage 8 points ago +8 / -0

First off, the Catholic Church is based out of the Vatican, not Italy.

Secondly, for most Catholics, this is at best equivalent to a pilgrimage site, not a “homeland promised to them by god” - It is far more similar to the relationship a Muslim has to Mecca, though even then, it’s far more watered down, as Catholics aren’t expected to visit per se, unlike Muslims, who are expressly told to do so as a core tenet of their religion (hajj), so your comparison is weak/incorrect on two fronts.

Finally, Muslims, Protestants, Methodist’s, Hindus etc don’t have automatic optional citizenship of their respective countries of interest - so the relationship is quite different.

I don’t begrudge anyone to engage in whatever religion or fantasy they please, but to say you are “Jew first, American second” will likely, for the aforementioned reasons, lead people to the “dual-and-rivaling interests” line of thought.

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +1 / -1

I see your argument. I also see that there was a time when being a German citizen was irrelevant if one was a Jew.

I can see that messing up loyalty to country in some.

4
Farage_massage 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was irrelevant if you were disabled, sympathized with communists or were otherwise considered untermensch as well, yes.

I’m not sure what that has to do with people in the United States 75 years later though.

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's a pretty recent lesson that things can get bad in a country for a group. We see that in a lot of countries against whites. I would expect if things got bad enough here for either group, they'd get the hell out.

5
ThePastDays 5 points ago +7 / -2

My 2nd favorite president. Washington is #1, Teddy is #2, Trump is #3.

We can't afford to wait so long for another real president. In 4 years there won't be a United States.

7
Everquest4Life 7 points ago +7 / -0

I like your style.

  1. Trump 2. Washington 3. Teddy

Because I like the look on the normie's faces when I say it!

5
AmericanPatriot6f0 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mean maybe. I still put Washington first

0
Donger-Lord2 0 points ago +3 / -3

Trump is better.

4
Hardcouer 4 points ago +4 / -0

You ever read about Washington? He beat the British and then refused to be made king/president-for-life. King of America. No thanks, America belongs to the people. What a dude.

2
realPhantomFuck 2 points ago +3 / -1

My Top 5: Washington, Jefferson, Roosevelt (the good one), Coolidge, and GEOTUS

2
Donger-Lord2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Coolidge?

5
PatriotsandBacon 5 points ago +5 / -0

How many dual-citizens in the three banches?

4
ontothefuture 4 points ago +4 / -0

75 Million patriots are on the right side of history, just saying.

4
CaptainButthurt 4 points ago +4 / -0

If a foreign country ever invaded our nation, democrats would fight on their side and so would every rino. That shows you the allegiance of many in government. It certainly isn't to this land.

3
no_ez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Circle back to me because our national anthem does not represent all of America /s

3
BigAmericanParty 3 points ago +3 / -0

No more "African-American" "Asian-American" "etc-American"

Just Americans from here on out.

Nationalism is the only cure for racism, and other ills of a country.

1
Highspergamy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dogmatic civic nationalism is what got us here. We were sold the promise and it was a lie.

3
Fallingshadow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Teddy Roosevelt was a badass.

3
Gmelindag 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you hate The American flag and if you refuse to stand for a national anthem just find yourself a different country, you’re not going to change ours!

2
Cman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kind of like all the US politicians with Israeli dual citizenship?

2
champdog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right here!

2
Gurren_Laggan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Time to bring back the bull moose

2
Executor 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only "progressive" I'd vote for.

2
Scankles 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only Josh Hawley has voted against every Biden nominee. Should be at least half the senate Republicans doing this with the other half being primaried. Be a precinct captain and rid the GOP of rot. Half are unfilled. https://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com/

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Superpeded 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is he saying we go one we go all?

2
Kenrailae 2 points ago +2 / -0

A fucking men.

2
Semmelweis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thumbnail almost made me think it was Gavin McInness

1
Hanging_Chad 1 point ago +1 / -0

50/50 is a rip-off. I always buy concentrated from the dealership

Edit: oh, this isn't about antifreeze

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
tashnag_01 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eh. I'm an Australian Armenian.

Proud Australian by heart, proud Armenian by blood. I don't care if Teddy or anyone here disagrees.

If I was an American, I would be equally proud of both my nationalities and equally prepared to die for both countries.

3
RiverFenix 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's the problem, what if your Armenian blood demanded you betray America?

What if Australia and America were on opposing sides of a conflict, would your loyalties lay in America or Australia, or Armenia. (btw, sorry to hear about Armenia losing that province hope your fam is ok)..

In peace time it's easy to be half and half and half but during war time there is no room for dual citizenships/allegiances.

1
tashnag_01 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never thought of it that way.

Hopefully I'll never have to choose but I would probably either fight for Armenia or sit out altogether. After all, my family and I were Armenians long before we were Australians.

I once heard someone say "if you're born in a barn, does that make you a horse?".

2
RiverFenix 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a good friend 'Geuvorkian', also extremely patriotic armenian, he was born in Moscow tho about 5 years before the USSR collapsed.

I was his campaign manager in the last election.

1
Bonsil 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's weak. my family originally were from Iraq but my great great whatever grandfather was a rich cunt and went to live in London, and then sent his family to Australia in the 1860's. Im iraq Australian by blood, but I am just Australian.

U would choose Armenia over your home country? Traitor.

1
tashnag_01 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're not Iraqi. Your family has been in Australia since the 1860s. I'd be really surprised if you or your parents could even speak Arabic.

I'm first generation Aussie. There's a difference.

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely true.

Now look around the country and tell me how many Americans you see.

1
Former_Libtard 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why he's on the Mt Rushmore of American presidents.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Tailgunnerjoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can’t think of one Democrat who believes in America first.

1
WeThePedeple 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very wise words, President Roosevelt.

1
Highspergamy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It pisses me off how DJT, Don jr, and Alex Jones will talk about no dual loyalty and America first while talking about how not having undieing support for Israel is a lack of patriotism.

1
Daughterfreedom76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed!❤🇺🇸❤

0
geebeext 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wow pretty anti-semitic man.

Kidding but that's how it will be attacked if ever tried to implement

0
Dr0neRec0very 0 points ago +1 / -1

Democrat solution: just pretend burning down businesses is patriotic.