10
posted ago by RememberKosciuszko +10 / -0

Probably just got reminded by text message of child pr0n stash with him as a main protagonist

Probably just got reminded by text message of child pr0n stash with him as a main protagonist
Comments (12)
sorted by:
4
Stevie875 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was old back stabbed Graham wasn’t it?

2
RememberKosciuszko [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not sure but I think so, yes. Didn't hear it well enough but comments say so

3
Japan4Salt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't forget that Graham threatened the Dems on TV that if they call witnesses, he was going to have the FBI subpoenaed.

2
Stevie875 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I didn’t hear that.. maybe this was his way to show that he was going to stand by his word. Kind of a subtle threat.

Might be holding out too much hope for him, but hopium is too addictive

1
oldgrouch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oops. Linda always lies.

2
KuzoKevin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. It was Graham.

2
Fergy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Graham told them if they did this, then we would make sure the trial was drug out for months.

2
Japan4Salt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want it to be over already but,

Calling witnesses will bury the Dems even further.

They are only panicking this as a last minute move because they know they just got destroyed yesterday.

2
RememberKosciuszko [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, then the question is:

What are they trying to do in the meantime?

It's clearly diverting attention then. Dems, while pushing horrendous policies, aren't retarded unfortunately.

They know they won't change mind of GOP or Trump supporters. The left already hates him so what gives.

They risk tremendous exposure. For what? False flag in the making?

It stinks from a mile away.

1
oldgrouch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lindsay Graham and McCarthy, Mitch,

All scum.

1
marishiten 1 point ago +1 / -0

It wasn't Graham. He voted to Subpeona all witnesses that submitted testimony and affidavits and call them before the Senate to be questioned.

That's not him voting to convict. That's him being an asshole to the Democrats and binding them up.

JUST like he said he would do to Pelosi if she wanted to pull that low shit and allow testimony.

he didn't vote to convict.

1
RememberKosciuszko [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know he didn't vote to convict

But ain't it all just dragging it out?

All of this won't change either the public opinion or won't convince more senators to convict. I suspect it's just diverting attention from something far worse.

By they way. I'm not sure of that so don't take my word for it - isn't it that the particular witnesses have to be accepted by majority? Read it here somewhere. If yes, then it won't benefit Trump in any way because Dem will struck anything worthwhile down.

I don't know, maybe it's a genius move in disguise, or just uniparty business as usual.