Lol remember the ozone hole scare in the 90s right before Al Gore dropped his move An Inconvenient Truth. Every prediction of that movie failed. Ozone hole is gone. Dare you to mention this to a Democrat.
It was Climate Gate that brought me to the realization that the whole system was a fraud. Once you understand what that grift is all about, the bread crumbs lead straight to the Globalists and all things follow from there.
I think it's the most important Red Pill, and the easiest case to make.
If that's the case, what information should I be aware of to convince myself that we don't need to make substantial economic adjustments to stop destabilizing the climate?
The information of which I'm aware includes:
The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years
Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s
Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s
It seems this is compatible with climate change predictions. What of this is false? Or why should I not worry about it?
You asked your question in good faith, so I'll reply in kind.
"The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years"
This is simply not supported by data. The 1930's had many years of higher temps. They have been revising the data to fit their narrative. There are also some serious issues with how global temperature is measured, including the "heat sink" bias of having the ever-decreasing measuring sites being located in cities and in terrible locations impacted by proximity to buildings/pavement.
We just finished a 20 year period of no warming at all.
"Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s"
Again, not accurate, but more important is the arbitrary choice of time period you start measuring from. The world was always going to warm in the 20th century because we were coming out of the Little Ice Age in the 19th century.
"Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s"
I hate being repetitive, but the same arguments I used above apply here.
If you want to do a deep dive into my sources, I'd recommend:
https://wattsupwiththat.com
The big issue with the "climate models" is that they completely ignore the effects of things like Solar Flares and Cosmic Rays which have a much bigger impact on temperatures than any Greenhouse Gas effect.
Not only that, but a strong case can be made using history that mankind thrives in warmer periods.
Thanks for the link. The provided site appears to be a lot to study.
Many, including me, have been convinced by the media that climate change is an existential threat, and that radical adjustments must be made to stop it. If that's true, then things like an effective global carbon tax seem necessary; however, the Paris Climate Agreement seems ineffective and harmful to the West. The reliance on wind and solar instead of nuclear also seems questionable.
If climate change is false, a lot of people need to be convinced. In this case, we need something like Mike Lindell's short video (the one that's 16 minutes) summarizing the arguments accurately, succinctly, and in a way that equips the viewer for further study.
A point also needs to be made who and why manufactured the narrative we have accepted. Now that we see how blatantly the global media coordinated lying about Covid and the 2020 election, it is easier to see how the narrative could be false. However, there remains the question: if the narrative is fundamentally based on manipulated data, who originated it, and for what reason?
Records have only been kept since mid 1800’s. All previous charts are extrapolated data, but that data shows we’re just in a normal cycle and it’s not warming outside normal trends. Due to Grand Solar Minimum we’re actually going to see colder norms for a while and many predict a timely small ice age. The scientists that rely on gov’t grants for their income SKEWED climate data under DS threat think Gore to inject their narrative. It’s all a carbon tax ploy to enrich the DS.
That is not a useful response that's going to change minds. If people believe it's real, then arguments are needed to invalidate the things we have accepted as true.
They'll say its because we banned CFCs. And I don't think its gone, just not talked about anymore. Likely the science behind it had nothing to do with CFCs. hell, it might actually have everything to do with polution.
It is gone, and that is exactly what they say when you bring it up. CFCs were banned in America so the ozone hole repaired itself. While the rest of the world was still using CFCs.
Because these morons believe (or at least make others believe) that the US is the only place in the world with pollution and if the US stops polluting than suddenly like magic pollution will cease to exist as if the rest of the world's pollution doesn't matter.
We’re already the cleanest first world country going. The major polluters are third world, communist nations and India. Time THEY cleaned up their act.
Nah, CFCs have been shown to degrade ozone in the lab, and they are banned pretty much world wide, including China surprisingly. However, the ban was not really needed as the primary release was due their use as refrigerants, and we were able to find better gasses for those, which significantly reduced demand of CFCs in general. The hole is still around BTW, but it's gotten much smaller, and you don't hear much about except in places like Australia, which is still affected by it.
Degrade ozone in a lab. However it takes a lot of travel from ground level, to float up to Ozone Layer level. During which there is a number of different layers of atmosphere that a CFC would have to go through before it could get to the ozone layer.
Why is the hole centered more where no one lives than where lots of people lived and used cfcs?
Yeah, they're lighter than air, so they do float to the outer atmosphere (as is ozone). It's actually pretty common for gasses to float that high. CFCs are only degraded by UV light, so they aren't degraded until they start getting close to the outer atmosphere, where UV is more intense. The reason why the hole isn't centered over a population are is because they are gasses that do not mix. Think about oil and water, even if you shake it them together, the oil droplets will eventually coalesce back into a single blob. Lastly, as odd as it may seem, the atmosphere has resonance frequencies that allow weather patterns to stay in a relatively fixed location, which is why it has stayed near the south pole for so long. Go look at the hexagonal storm at Saturn's pole, it's the same phenomenon. Any other holes that are formed would eventually make their way to the larger one and "merge".
Yes, and the ozone hole was because of us plebs and our hairspray, totally not from the nukes they used to light off in the atmosphere just to see what would happen
It already stopped working. When social media was free, Trump got elected. Then they locked down communication and cheated bigly, and now they're doing everything they can to prevent him or another leader like that from ever running.
Once you have a China-style totalitarianism going, it doesn't matter what people think. You tell them what they think, and that is what they think, or prison.
public school curriculum creates this fear , they push solar panels as earth friendly , ignore nuclear as a science topic and then only loosely teach Chernobyl disaster without context of communism.
A lot of right wing luddites are too, to be fair. Mention nuclear and they'll reeeee about Fukushima or some shit, without actually realizing how little radiation was released. Guess what, coal power plants release more radiation into the air than nuclear plants because coal contains uranium and thorium, and that's including every accident that's ever occurred. Even worse, by being anti-nuclear, they're preventing older and less safe plants from being decommissioned because they're not allowed to build new ones!
My money is still on the Ice Age that was supposed to come, playing the long game. Some say their ozone hole/global warming/climate change game is to divert attention and prevent escape to the Greater Realm, beyond Antarctica. About as believable as any other narrative they've shoved into our brains.
About that... we’re actually in the ice age right now, just in one of the interglacial periods where we don’t have everything down to Kansas frozen over. The evidence is that there’s permanent ice caps at the poles
You're saying you never understood what peak oil theory was: that we'd reach a time when the easy oil had been extracted, and we'd have to resort to other means which are more expensive.
That happened, with domestic production. Then we became reliant on Middle Eastern oil. They haven't reached the point where the easy oil stops, so we don't know if it ever will. In the meantime the usurper is destroying domestic production, making us rely on foreign oil again.
You have missed many decades of clear evidence; try to keep up
Literally through any random topic and it is related to Climate Change. Kind of like how every symptom of the past flu/common cold is now related to COVID-19. The government must act to protect you! Seeing the pattern?
All the people claiming 'weather change' and the oceans will rise tremendously, all have beach houses. I wonder why that is? Did they drive the price of beach land down so they can buy said land?
The problem is that the concept of climate change is scientifically sound, and will happen in the long term, but the timelines liberals give are 100% political FUD. We've still got at least 100 years we see any major effects, and they might not even be bad. The period with the highest CO2 in the atmosphere was the Cretaceous period, which was the most biodiverse time in Earth's history. It was a big, wet, tropical ball.
I don't see us using all the gas engines etc in a hundred years. If we make it that far things will get better automatically through improvements in technology, not from killing all the cows this instant.
Did anyone else see Elon Musk and Joe Rogan the other day talking about their support for a carbon tax? The richest man in history and a 100+ millionaire talking about how it was obviously a great idea for everyone to pay a carbon tax. Shit boils my blood.
I have not yet been convinced that the climate change narrative is false. Under that belief, a global carbon tax – enforced in China and everywhere – seems the most sound idea in the world.
I cannot criticize that idea if climate change is true. However, if someone could convince me it is false...?
Demonrats are in control, they control the narrative, everything is going to go great thanks to Bidens magical ability of not being a republican and fix everything according to the media.
My favorite is the "We have more Named storms this year, than any year prior"
Well no shit, that's what happens when you start giving more storms names. 30 years ago it was just Hurricanes. Now it's every storm larger than 2 state counties.
Not to mention the hysteria over sea levels rising. Rising the same few mm that they've risen every year ever since they started collecting data but WE'RE ALL GONNA DROWN!!!
I remember the comedy of a climate change “protest” that happened in my area a couple months ago. About 10 people showed up, all bundled to the gills because it was freezing, holding signs about how the earth is boiling. One guy had a giant parka, snow pants, winter boots, a full face mask, and a sign reading “IT’S HOT EVERYWHERE”. Of course the local trained seal populous clapped from behind their computer screens saying that they were doing major work in the fight against climate change (and also conservatives because that has something to do with spicy weather patterns somehow).
Up is down, dark is light, and CO2 causes freezing versions of global warming freezing rivers and freeways while shattering 60yo low temp records and is leading to a food collapse from lost farm produce and dying farm animals and power outages from non-redundant power grids of people who can't stay warm...
I agree that man needs to stop causing climate change starting with their nutso cloud seeding experiments and Bill Gate's idiotic idea to spray calcium carbonate dust in the atmosphere to block the sun. Welcome to f'ing Clown World:
No, get with the times. Climate Change is now a race issue and if you deny it, you're a white supremacist racist.
We'll hear plenty of stories about how the extreme cold is killing black people at an alarming rate. They'll just classify Covid deaths as deaths due to extreme cold now that Covid has served its purpose.
"We have to continue the lockdowns to prevent climate change. You cant eat meat because of climate change. We have to turn your power off every other day because of climate change. You can only drive 20 miles a week because of climate change. Gas is $20 a gallon because of climate change."
All of this is very likely to occur in the next four years.
This is why I still use the term global warming. Never let them forget their goal post moves.
14 days to bend the curve. Global warming. Because some people will buy any bullshit they fling.
Step 1: Manufacture a crisis
Step 2: Offer solution based on goal-seeking "science" that has nothing to do with the "problem" and everything to do with growing state power.
Step 3: Shut off all debate about the "science" and try to implement solution.
Global Warming, WuFlu, Critical Race Theory.....it's the same damn playbook over and over.
Lol remember the ozone hole scare in the 90s right before Al Gore dropped his move An Inconvenient Truth. Every prediction of that movie failed. Ozone hole is gone. Dare you to mention this to a Democrat.
It was Climate Gate that brought me to the realization that the whole system was a fraud. Once you understand what that grift is all about, the bread crumbs lead straight to the Globalists and all things follow from there.
I think it's the most important Red Pill, and the easiest case to make.
I see more and more masks on chins. I think normies are starting to realize that the plague isn’t dropping bodies left and right.
If that's the case, what information should I be aware of to convince myself that we don't need to make substantial economic adjustments to stop destabilizing the climate?
The information of which I'm aware includes:
The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years
Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s
Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s
It seems this is compatible with climate change predictions. What of this is false? Or why should I not worry about it?
You asked your question in good faith, so I'll reply in kind. "The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years" This is simply not supported by data. The 1930's had many years of higher temps. They have been revising the data to fit their narrative. There are also some serious issues with how global temperature is measured, including the "heat sink" bias of having the ever-decreasing measuring sites being located in cities and in terrible locations impacted by proximity to buildings/pavement. We just finished a 20 year period of no warming at all. "Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s" Again, not accurate, but more important is the arbitrary choice of time period you start measuring from. The world was always going to warm in the 20th century because we were coming out of the Little Ice Age in the 19th century. "Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s" I hate being repetitive, but the same arguments I used above apply here. If you want to do a deep dive into my sources, I'd recommend: https://wattsupwiththat.com
The big issue with the "climate models" is that they completely ignore the effects of things like Solar Flares and Cosmic Rays which have a much bigger impact on temperatures than any Greenhouse Gas effect.
Not only that, but a strong case can be made using history that mankind thrives in warmer periods.
Thanks for the link. The provided site appears to be a lot to study.
Many, including me, have been convinced by the media that climate change is an existential threat, and that radical adjustments must be made to stop it. If that's true, then things like an effective global carbon tax seem necessary; however, the Paris Climate Agreement seems ineffective and harmful to the West. The reliance on wind and solar instead of nuclear also seems questionable.
If climate change is false, a lot of people need to be convinced. In this case, we need something like Mike Lindell's short video (the one that's 16 minutes) summarizing the arguments accurately, succinctly, and in a way that equips the viewer for further study.
A point also needs to be made who and why manufactured the narrative we have accepted. Now that we see how blatantly the global media coordinated lying about Covid and the 2020 election, it is easier to see how the narrative could be false. However, there remains the question: if the narrative is fundamentally based on manipulated data, who originated it, and for what reason?
Records have only been kept since mid 1800’s. All previous charts are extrapolated data, but that data shows we’re just in a normal cycle and it’s not warming outside normal trends. Due to Grand Solar Minimum we’re actually going to see colder norms for a while and many predict a timely small ice age. The scientists that rely on gov’t grants for their income SKEWED climate data under DS threat think Gore to inject their narrative. It’s all a carbon tax ploy to enrich the DS.
Good question. How about the fact that it's not real?
That is not a useful response that's going to change minds. If people believe it's real, then arguments are needed to invalidate the things we have accepted as true.
They'll say its because we banned CFCs. And I don't think its gone, just not talked about anymore. Likely the science behind it had nothing to do with CFCs. hell, it might actually have everything to do with polution.
It is gone, and that is exactly what they say when you bring it up. CFCs were banned in America so the ozone hole repaired itself. While the rest of the world was still using CFCs.
Because these morons believe (or at least make others believe) that the US is the only place in the world with pollution and if the US stops polluting than suddenly like magic pollution will cease to exist as if the rest of the world's pollution doesn't matter.
We’re already the cleanest first world country going. The major polluters are third world, communist nations and India. Time THEY cleaned up their act.
I work with a lefty who believes that the US is fairly clean but only because we "export our pollution" by having all of our products made in China.
And they see that as no different than the pollution coming from our own imaginary smokestacks.
Nah, CFCs have been shown to degrade ozone in the lab, and they are banned pretty much world wide, including China surprisingly. However, the ban was not really needed as the primary release was due their use as refrigerants, and we were able to find better gasses for those, which significantly reduced demand of CFCs in general. The hole is still around BTW, but it's gotten much smaller, and you don't hear much about except in places like Australia, which is still affected by it.
Degrade ozone in a lab. However it takes a lot of travel from ground level, to float up to Ozone Layer level. During which there is a number of different layers of atmosphere that a CFC would have to go through before it could get to the ozone layer.
Why is the hole centered more where no one lives than where lots of people lived and used cfcs?
Yeah, they're lighter than air, so they do float to the outer atmosphere (as is ozone). It's actually pretty common for gasses to float that high. CFCs are only degraded by UV light, so they aren't degraded until they start getting close to the outer atmosphere, where UV is more intense. The reason why the hole isn't centered over a population are is because they are gasses that do not mix. Think about oil and water, even if you shake it them together, the oil droplets will eventually coalesce back into a single blob. Lastly, as odd as it may seem, the atmosphere has resonance frequencies that allow weather patterns to stay in a relatively fixed location, which is why it has stayed near the south pole for so long. Go look at the hexagonal storm at Saturn's pole, it's the same phenomenon. Any other holes that are formed would eventually make their way to the larger one and "merge".
Chlorofluorocarbons!
Don't forget the "new ice age": https://i.maga.host/VZWLY7d.gif
Yes, and the ozone hole was because of us plebs and our hairspray, totally not from the nukes they used to light off in the atmosphere just to see what would happen
How to break the cycle and expose all? It is tiring to try to red pill all these resistant automaton fucks, so tiring.
We do it one mind at a time until we hit critical mass.
That's the best we can do in the absence of some "great reveal".
It is indeed exhausting, but we'll outlast them because the truth is on our side.
The playbook will only change when it stops working. So many people are dumb and have no courage or integrity unfortunately.
It already stopped working. When social media was free, Trump got elected. Then they locked down communication and cheated bigly, and now they're doing everything they can to prevent him or another leader like that from ever running.
Once you have a China-style totalitarianism going, it doesn't matter what people think. You tell them what they think, and that is what they think, or prison.
Accurate observation, but I'm a bit more optimistic.
I'm optimistic because the truth is on our side and we are just going to keep gaining momentum.
Hegelian Dialectic. Never fails. Too many mouth-breathers to buy into the bullshit.
We’re all in this together
Nothing to see here~ just China, China, China
https://solarpowernerd.com/top-solar-panel-manufacturers/
Rare earth money for CCP. Fission and Fusion are the only sustainable types of energy, but for some reason leftists are terrified of it.
https://news.mit.edu/2020/physics-fusion-studies-0929
public school curriculum creates this fear , they push solar panels as earth friendly , ignore nuclear as a science topic and then only loosely teach Chernobyl disaster without context of communism.
A lot of right wing luddites are too, to be fair. Mention nuclear and they'll reeeee about Fukushima or some shit, without actually realizing how little radiation was released. Guess what, coal power plants release more radiation into the air than nuclear plants because coal contains uranium and thorium, and that's including every accident that's ever occurred. Even worse, by being anti-nuclear, they're preventing older and less safe plants from being decommissioned because they're not allowed to build new ones!
The new normal
14 days, 14 months, it's all the same
"This is why the Paris Accord is more important than ever" -Joe Biden
My money is still on the Ice Age that was supposed to come, playing the long game. Some say their ozone hole/global warming/climate change game is to divert attention and prevent escape to the Greater Realm, beyond Antarctica. About as believable as any other narrative they've shoved into our brains.
About that... we’re actually in the ice age right now, just in one of the interglacial periods where we don’t have everything down to Kansas frozen over. The evidence is that there’s permanent ice caps at the poles
https://greenplanetethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/time1.jpg https://greenplanetethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/TimeCooling.jpg https://greenplanetethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Time-Global-Cooling.png
Then you're letting them forget. It started with Global Cooling. But they're like "Nuh uh, that was just the media hyping it up!"
I'm old enough to remember the "new ice age"....shameless hucksters...hold on to your wallet
Wasn’t that the time when “peak oil” was happening, too?
Peak oil happened. Hence fracking
You're saying you never understood what peak oil theory was: that we'd reach a time when the easy oil had been extracted, and we'd have to resort to other means which are more expensive.
That happened, with domestic production. Then we became reliant on Middle Eastern oil. They haven't reached the point where the easy oil stops, so we don't know if it ever will. In the meantime the usurper is destroying domestic production, making us rely on foreign oil again.
You have missed many decades of clear evidence; try to keep up
I remember that shit too, back in the 70's. What a joke.
Yup: https://i.maga.host/VZWLY7d.gif
The earth is cooling
I get my marching orders from that retarded kid from Sweden.
she's 18 now, they'll have to find some new kid to brainwash and manipulate for propaganda sound bytes.
Kek! 🤪
She'll be issuing them from an Indian jail before long.
Supposed to get down to 8 degrees here next week.
In Texas.
"gLoBaL wArMiNg GuYs"
Haven't seen double digits in over a week. Enjoy your heat wave!
This is where they break out that amazing "Weather isn't the climate" line.
Totally ignores that those words are synonyms for one another.
And a foot of snow?
We're on day 10 of not getting above -1° for a high here in Minnesota.
Then again, we get this kind of weather almost every year. Usually in January.
Kids went to school at -19 degrees here.
I made the mistake of quickly retrieving a metal shovel without gloves one day last week. Felt like burning electricity going through my hands.
This global warming shit is a trip!
*has a drought year.
“SEE GLOBAL WARMING IS KILLIJG US ALL! We have to do something or we’re all gonna die!!!!!”
*has a record cold year
“YEARLY WEATHER PATTERNS ARENT INDICATIVE OF LONG TERM CLIMATE TRENDS!!!! BESIDES! IT WAS CAUSED BY GLOBAL WARMING ANYWAYS!!! REEEEEEEE!!!”
Is that what Al Gore looks like now? Even he stopped believing his rhetoric. You don't hear a word from him any longer. THANK GOD!
He is insufferable. If there ever were a more perfect term than that to describe him, I will stand corrected!
Literally through any random topic and it is related to Climate Change. Kind of like how every symptom of the past flu/common cold is now related to COVID-19. The government must act to protect you! Seeing the pattern?
Alex Jones says it all the time...
All the people claiming 'weather change' and the oceans will rise tremendously, all have beach houses. I wonder why that is? Did they drive the price of beach land down so they can buy said land?
The problem is that the concept of climate change is scientifically sound, and will happen in the long term, but the timelines liberals give are 100% political FUD. We've still got at least 100 years we see any major effects, and they might not even be bad. The period with the highest CO2 in the atmosphere was the Cretaceous period, which was the most biodiverse time in Earth's history. It was a big, wet, tropical ball.
I don't see us using all the gas engines etc in a hundred years. If we make it that far things will get better automatically through improvements in technology, not from killing all the cows this instant.
Increase taxes to launder money to china through globalist environmental scams
Did anyone else see Elon Musk and Joe Rogan the other day talking about their support for a carbon tax? The richest man in history and a 100+ millionaire talking about how it was obviously a great idea for everyone to pay a carbon tax. Shit boils my blood.
I have not yet been convinced that the climate change narrative is false. Under that belief, a global carbon tax – enforced in China and everywhere – seems the most sound idea in the world.
I cannot criticize that idea if climate change is true. However, if someone could convince me it is false...?
covid masks are harmful to the ozone, bigots
They murder trillions of birds every hour
You get to see all the breath particles coming out of the masks in the cold, proving they don’t do jack. I love it haha
You’d think if covid was a REAL pandemic there would be hazmat disposal sites everywhere instead of used masks littering parking lots? Riiight?
We're not going to hear shit.
Demonrats are in control, they control the narrative, everything is going to go great thanks to Bidens magical ability of not being a republican and fix everything according to the media.
Wasnt a new ice age the talk in the 70s? Guess they circled back...
Must be one of those "outlier" years. Don't worry the trend will continue and we will all die in.... What? 11 years now? 😂
My favorite is when they say shit like “the coldest temperature on record” when recorded weather goes back 100 fucking years out of 4 billion
My favorite is the "We have more Named storms this year, than any year prior"
Well no shit, that's what happens when you start giving more storms names. 30 years ago it was just Hurricanes. Now it's every storm larger than 2 state counties.
The climate changes. That is it's nature.
and the lockdowns stopped climate change before they caused climate change...
If the fat chyna communist farts in beijing, will that make it rain in Seattle?
Fuck this in San Diego it feels like a global colding right now.
10 years now.
Not to mention the hysteria over sea levels rising. Rising the same few mm that they've risen every year ever since they started collecting data but WE'RE ALL GONNA DROWN!!!
And the leaders of climate change continue to buy ocean front mansions. They are NOT concerned about the water level rising.
Remember when they said Miami would be underwater by now?
It’s almost as if weather goes in cycles. Weird.
Nice art.
is that manbearpig?
It’s that “ackchyually” guy
I remember the comedy of a climate change “protest” that happened in my area a couple months ago. About 10 people showed up, all bundled to the gills because it was freezing, holding signs about how the earth is boiling. One guy had a giant parka, snow pants, winter boots, a full face mask, and a sign reading “IT’S HOT EVERYWHERE”. Of course the local trained seal populous clapped from behind their computer screens saying that they were doing major work in the fight against climate change (and also conservatives because that has something to do with spicy weather patterns somehow).
Systemic raycissssm
Stay home. Stay safe. Biden will shovel you out.
So actually is Ackchyually misspelled on purpose..did I miss something?
Know your meme!
https://amp.knowyourmeme.com/memes/ackchyually
Grammar counts.
Up is down, dark is light, and CO2 causes freezing versions of global warming freezing rivers and freeways while shattering 60yo low temp records and is leading to a food collapse from lost farm produce and dying farm animals and power outages from non-redundant power grids of people who can't stay warm...
Meanwhile we're coming out of a mini ice age and it's significantly colder than in the middle ages.
Breaking News: Directional science results in the direction the money that funded it wants.
I agree that man needs to stop causing climate change starting with their nutso cloud seeding experiments and Bill Gate's idiotic idea to spray calcium carbonate dust in the atmosphere to block the sun. Welcome to f'ing Clown World:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2021/01/11/bill-gates-backed-climate-solution-gains-traction-but-concerns-linger/?sh=438903f5793b
What are they going to do next? Spray firefighting foam into volcanoes?
Google bread and milk video. You won’t be disappointed.
As I dig out my driveway from a four foot rift of snow, all I can think of is: bring on the global warming!
more like global harming
We have this cold in TEXAS.
TEXAS.
My wife always wears shorts in February. She doesn't even own a jacket.
YET HERE WE ARE, UNDER FREEZING AND SCHEDULED TO HIT 15 DEGREES IN HOT AS HELL HOUSTON.
GLOBAL WARMING??? COME ON MAN
Correction: 12 years was 4 years ago. We only have 8 years now.
No I think they reset the clock to 12 years after Biden was installed.
MUST FIGHT WITH HIGHER TAXES!
No, get with the times. Climate Change is now a race issue and if you deny it, you're a white supremacist racist.
We'll hear plenty of stories about how the extreme cold is killing black people at an alarming rate. They'll just classify Covid deaths as deaths due to extreme cold now that Covid has served its purpose.
The world will end in x years unless you vote democrat
Party of psuedoscience lol
"We have to continue the lockdowns to prevent climate change. You cant eat meat because of climate change. We have to turn your power off every other day because of climate change. You can only drive 20 miles a week because of climate change. Gas is $20 a gallon because of climate change."
All of this is very likely to occur in the next four years.
Don’t forget how clean air due to less travel because of COVID-19 is causing climate change and we only have 12 years left to live.
Or is it 10 years? Nine? Wasn’t it “10 years left” two years ago?
It's winter, bitches. WINTER COLD, SUMMER HOT.....DUH
We're entering the period of Solar Minimum, they won't be able to keep up the warming sham for much longer...much as happened in the 1970s.
Source: https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/news-articles/solar-minimum-is-coming
I'm all for being a good steward to our planet but the climate change cult goes too far.
Is there any relevant stories related to this meme? I'd prefer archived links if possible.
https://www.ecowatch.com/global-warming-extreme-cold-weather-2650480603.html
https://cbs6albany.com/weather/weather-extra/global-warming-when-its-cold-out-how-weather-and-climate-are-different
This is just from a quick search from current “news”. They do this every year there is extreme cold. Much more to come
Thank you.
Retards will always be making up stories.
The only thing you can change is your reaction to the made up story.
You gonna repost an insane comment a Liberal made about Trump for the past few years?
Or you gonna post a contribtution to the MAGA Forever Movement?
Yeah. Im old enough to Rember everyone was gonna die because the earth was cooling and acid rain was gonna melt my face off. Lol