Lol remember the ozone hole scare in the 90s right before Al Gore dropped his move An Inconvenient Truth. Every prediction of that movie failed. Ozone hole is gone. Dare you to mention this to a Democrat.
It was Climate Gate that brought me to the realization that the whole system was a fraud. Once you understand what that grift is all about, the bread crumbs lead straight to the Globalists and all things follow from there.
I think it's the most important Red Pill, and the easiest case to make.
If that's the case, what information should I be aware of to convince myself that we don't need to make substantial economic adjustments to stop destabilizing the climate?
The information of which I'm aware includes:
The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years
Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s
Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s
It seems this is compatible with climate change predictions. What of this is false? Or why should I not worry about it?
You asked your question in good faith, so I'll reply in kind.
"The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years"
This is simply not supported by data. The 1930's had many years of higher temps. They have been revising the data to fit their narrative. There are also some serious issues with how global temperature is measured, including the "heat sink" bias of having the ever-decreasing measuring sites being located in cities and in terrible locations impacted by proximity to buildings/pavement.
We just finished a 20 year period of no warming at all.
"Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s"
Again, not accurate, but more important is the arbitrary choice of time period you start measuring from. The world was always going to warm in the 20th century because we were coming out of the Little Ice Age in the 19th century.
"Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s"
I hate being repetitive, but the same arguments I used above apply here.
If you want to do a deep dive into my sources, I'd recommend:
https://wattsupwiththat.com
The big issue with the "climate models" is that they completely ignore the effects of things like Solar Flares and Cosmic Rays which have a much bigger impact on temperatures than any Greenhouse Gas effect.
Not only that, but a strong case can be made using history that mankind thrives in warmer periods.
Records have only been kept since mid 1800’s. All previous charts are extrapolated data, but that data shows we’re just in a normal cycle and it’s not warming outside normal trends. Due to Grand Solar Minimum we’re actually going to see colder norms for a while and many predict a timely small ice age. The scientists that rely on gov’t grants for their income SKEWED climate data under DS threat think Gore to inject their narrative. It’s all a carbon tax ploy to enrich the DS.
They'll say its because we banned CFCs. And I don't think its gone, just not talked about anymore. Likely the science behind it had nothing to do with CFCs. hell, it might actually have everything to do with polution.
It is gone, and that is exactly what they say when you bring it up. CFCs were banned in America so the ozone hole repaired itself. While the rest of the world was still using CFCs.
Because these morons believe (or at least make others believe) that the US is the only place in the world with pollution and if the US stops polluting than suddenly like magic pollution will cease to exist as if the rest of the world's pollution doesn't matter.
Nah, CFCs have been shown to degrade ozone in the lab, and they are banned pretty much world wide, including China surprisingly. However, the ban was not really needed as the primary release was due their use as refrigerants, and we were able to find better gasses for those, which significantly reduced demand of CFCs in general. The hole is still around BTW, but it's gotten much smaller, and you don't hear much about except in places like Australia, which is still affected by it.
Degrade ozone in a lab. However it takes a lot of travel from ground level, to float up to Ozone Layer level. During which there is a number of different layers of atmosphere that a CFC would have to go through before it could get to the ozone layer.
Why is the hole centered more where no one lives than where lots of people lived and used cfcs?
Yes, and the ozone hole was because of us plebs and our hairspray, totally not from the nukes they used to light off in the atmosphere just to see what would happen
It already stopped working. When social media was free, Trump got elected. Then they locked down communication and cheated bigly, and now they're doing everything they can to prevent him or another leader like that from ever running.
Once you have a China-style totalitarianism going, it doesn't matter what people think. You tell them what they think, and that is what they think, or prison.
Step 1: Manufacture a crisis
Step 2: Offer solution based on goal-seeking "science" that has nothing to do with the "problem" and everything to do with growing state power.
Step 3: Shut off all debate about the "science" and try to implement solution.
Global Warming, WuFlu, Critical Race Theory.....it's the same damn playbook over and over.
Lol remember the ozone hole scare in the 90s right before Al Gore dropped his move An Inconvenient Truth. Every prediction of that movie failed. Ozone hole is gone. Dare you to mention this to a Democrat.
It was Climate Gate that brought me to the realization that the whole system was a fraud. Once you understand what that grift is all about, the bread crumbs lead straight to the Globalists and all things follow from there.
I think it's the most important Red Pill, and the easiest case to make.
I see more and more masks on chins. I think normies are starting to realize that the plague isn’t dropping bodies left and right.
If that's the case, what information should I be aware of to convince myself that we don't need to make substantial economic adjustments to stop destabilizing the climate?
The information of which I'm aware includes:
The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years
Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s
Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s
It seems this is compatible with climate change predictions. What of this is false? Or why should I not worry about it?
You asked your question in good faith, so I'll reply in kind. "The top 10 warmest years on record occurred in the past 15 years" This is simply not supported by data. The 1930's had many years of higher temps. They have been revising the data to fit their narrative. There are also some serious issues with how global temperature is measured, including the "heat sink" bias of having the ever-decreasing measuring sites being located in cities and in terrible locations impacted by proximity to buildings/pavement. We just finished a 20 year period of no warming at all. "Average global temperatures have risen 1.2 C (2.16 F) since the 1910s" Again, not accurate, but more important is the arbitrary choice of time period you start measuring from. The world was always going to warm in the 20th century because we were coming out of the Little Ice Age in the 19th century. "Average global temperatures have risen 0.4 C (0.72 F) just between the 2000s and 2010s" I hate being repetitive, but the same arguments I used above apply here. If you want to do a deep dive into my sources, I'd recommend: https://wattsupwiththat.com
The big issue with the "climate models" is that they completely ignore the effects of things like Solar Flares and Cosmic Rays which have a much bigger impact on temperatures than any Greenhouse Gas effect.
Not only that, but a strong case can be made using history that mankind thrives in warmer periods.
Records have only been kept since mid 1800’s. All previous charts are extrapolated data, but that data shows we’re just in a normal cycle and it’s not warming outside normal trends. Due to Grand Solar Minimum we’re actually going to see colder norms for a while and many predict a timely small ice age. The scientists that rely on gov’t grants for their income SKEWED climate data under DS threat think Gore to inject their narrative. It’s all a carbon tax ploy to enrich the DS.
Good question. How about the fact that it's not real?
They'll say its because we banned CFCs. And I don't think its gone, just not talked about anymore. Likely the science behind it had nothing to do with CFCs. hell, it might actually have everything to do with polution.
It is gone, and that is exactly what they say when you bring it up. CFCs were banned in America so the ozone hole repaired itself. While the rest of the world was still using CFCs.
Because these morons believe (or at least make others believe) that the US is the only place in the world with pollution and if the US stops polluting than suddenly like magic pollution will cease to exist as if the rest of the world's pollution doesn't matter.
Nah, CFCs have been shown to degrade ozone in the lab, and they are banned pretty much world wide, including China surprisingly. However, the ban was not really needed as the primary release was due their use as refrigerants, and we were able to find better gasses for those, which significantly reduced demand of CFCs in general. The hole is still around BTW, but it's gotten much smaller, and you don't hear much about except in places like Australia, which is still affected by it.
Degrade ozone in a lab. However it takes a lot of travel from ground level, to float up to Ozone Layer level. During which there is a number of different layers of atmosphere that a CFC would have to go through before it could get to the ozone layer.
Why is the hole centered more where no one lives than where lots of people lived and used cfcs?
Chlorofluorocarbons!
Don't forget the "new ice age": https://i.maga.host/VZWLY7d.gif
Yes, and the ozone hole was because of us plebs and our hairspray, totally not from the nukes they used to light off in the atmosphere just to see what would happen
How to break the cycle and expose all? It is tiring to try to red pill all these resistant automaton fucks, so tiring.
We do it one mind at a time until we hit critical mass.
That's the best we can do in the absence of some "great reveal".
It is indeed exhausting, but we'll outlast them because the truth is on our side.
The playbook will only change when it stops working. So many people are dumb and have no courage or integrity unfortunately.
It already stopped working. When social media was free, Trump got elected. Then they locked down communication and cheated bigly, and now they're doing everything they can to prevent him or another leader like that from ever running.
Once you have a China-style totalitarianism going, it doesn't matter what people think. You tell them what they think, and that is what they think, or prison.
Accurate observation, but I'm a bit more optimistic.
I'm optimistic because the truth is on our side and we are just going to keep gaining momentum.
Hegelian Dialectic. Never fails. Too many mouth-breathers to buy into the bullshit.