But if you spend any time on Wikipedia you wouldn't be surprised.. despite the fact that Wikipedia was originally known for not really allowing people to delete information just because it was harmful to their special interest that's exactly what they do. The moderators of Wikipedia are mostly open communists and Democrat Party agents..
they regularly delete any information that reflects negatively on the Democrat party.. meanwhile all day create hundreds of fake articles slandering Republican politicians with lies and disinformation.. many of their articles look like they were ripped directly from The Huffington Post or something. Some of them were probably written by The Huffington Post staff..
If anybody deserves to lose section 230 protections it's Wikipedia..
their reason for delete isn't anything elaborate -- just a "speedy deletion"
Exactly
But if you spend any time on Wikipedia you wouldn't be surprised.. despite the fact that Wikipedia was originally known for not really allowing people to delete information just because it was harmful to their special interest that's exactly what they do. The moderators of Wikipedia are mostly open communists and Democrat Party agents..
they regularly delete any information that reflects negatively on the Democrat party.. meanwhile all day create hundreds of fake articles slandering Republican politicians with lies and disinformation.. many of their articles look like they were ripped directly from The Huffington Post or something. Some of them were probably written by The Huffington Post staff..
If anybody deserves to lose section 230 protections it's Wikipedia..
thank you
You can change the title slightly, like "calling" and repost it. You can admin it and prevent anyone else from making changes.
you can't. The admins of Wikipedia are open communists
The deletion was due too, No Standings......