2921 House Managers Fold: Will Not Call Impeachment Witnesses After Pelosi Subpoena Threat (www.zerohedge.com) 🚔 PARTY OF CRIME 🚔 posted 60 days ago by Junosu 60 days ago by Junosu +2921 / -0 72 comments share 72 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (72) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 111 ▼ – C10H15N 111 points 60 days ago +111 / -0 Surprise surprise permalink save report block reply ▲ 135 ▼ – Junosu [S] 135 points 60 days ago +135 / -0 What's Nancy hiding? Don't back down. Accelerate FORWARD! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 56 ▼ – Infuriator 56 points 60 days ago +56 / -0 This guy fucks! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 47 ▼ – Toughsky_Shitsky 47 points 60 days ago +47 / -0 Yep. Tactical error by Trump's lawyers to give away a potentially devastating call of Pelosi, DC mayor, and even Kamala to testify under oath. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 33 ▼ – SurfingUSA 33 points 60 days ago +33 / -0 Not really. Trials are super unpredictable. If you can close out a win, you ALWAYS take it. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – pinchitony 9 points 60 days ago +9 / -0 yeah, this is the chess equivalent of risking your king for one of your enemie’s bishop permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 14 ▼ – SpaceGhostNR4W 14 points 60 days ago +14 / -0 Dems wanted to call witnesses for weeks on end it appears. It was a lose lose for them either way. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 8 ▼ – YourMamma57 8 points 60 days ago +8 / -0 Maybe we can subpoena Nancy when we camel toe permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – newrandomperson 9 points 60 days ago +9 / -0 From what I understand, the Senate would have to approve the witnesses. So, I doubt they would have approved these. It just would have looked bad when they approve all of their witnesses and didn't approve all of Trumps. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – Toughsky_Shitsky 6 points 60 days ago +6 / -0 No doubt the dems would have denied Trump's list of witnesses. But that's the game they tried to play, so make them play it with Trump's chess pieces. They noped out fast ... surprise. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – gaijin_ronin 3 points 60 days ago +3 / -0 Ramming speed to get up in that permalink parent save report block reply
Surprise surprise
What's Nancy hiding? Don't back down. Accelerate FORWARD!
This guy fucks!
Yep. Tactical error by Trump's lawyers to give away a potentially devastating call of Pelosi, DC mayor, and even Kamala to testify under oath.
Not really. Trials are super unpredictable. If you can close out a win, you ALWAYS take it.
yeah, this is the chess equivalent of risking your king for one of your enemie’s bishop
Dems wanted to call witnesses for weeks on end it appears. It was a lose lose for them either way.
Maybe we can subpoena Nancy when we camel toe
From what I understand, the Senate would have to approve the witnesses. So, I doubt they would have approved these. It just would have looked bad when they approve all of their witnesses and didn't approve all of Trumps.
No doubt the dems would have denied Trump's list of witnesses. But that's the game they tried to play, so make them play it with Trump's chess pieces.
They noped out fast ... surprise.
Ramming speed to get up in that