1731
Comments (61)
sorted by:
49
BS2020 49 points ago +49 / -0

they're just going to keep painting THESELVES as petty losers

14
ObongoForPrison2020 14 points ago +14 / -0

Always have been.

9
ironhorse 9 points ago +9 / -0

"petty loser" is their constitutes favorite color after "victim"

4
BS2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

But victim is surely their go-to!

35
latetotheparty 35 points ago +36 / -1

If I am not mistaken, the qualifications to stand for Federal office are clearly stated in the Constitution... and a law "custom tailored" to bar Trump from office would therefore likely be found unconstitutional unless the Constitution itself was amended to suit. Odds of that would be -zero-.

29
ProphetOfKek 29 points ago +30 / -1

SCOTUS doesn’t give two shits about the constitution.

2
BoughtByBloomberg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watch the Supreme court drag it's heels on the issue till past 2024.

Lawfare is the most evil of tools.

29
GaryJackson 29 points ago +29 / -0

If they go 14th Amendment I'd argue that since Trump was acquitted the first 2 times that it's completely retarded to try it a third time. I would argue Double Jeopardy. Shit at this point I'd argue Triple Jeopardy. He was found innocent once you can't try him for the same crime twice. You have to add charges which probably would be fake and unprovable.

12
StartAgain 12 points ago +12 / -0

There's no sinking too low for them. They keep sinking further and further in their own bullshit. Trump has exposed Democrats as being shit & We the People will forever be grateful

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
16
Sphinx3peat 16 points ago +17 / -1

Thing is, the Constitution is pretty clear as to what precludes someone from running for office. That one party is butthurt about an opponent isn’t a legal reason.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
Gloria_InExcelsisKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct me if I'm wrong but STOTUS did the only immediate thing they could do which was to refuse to preside. There was nothing proactive they could do to shut this clown show of a hearing down.

1
Colorado_Love 1 point ago +1 / -0

You hit the nail on the head.

What do you think “they” have on them to make them such publicly evil and vile people?

0
ProphetOfKek 0 points ago +2 / -2

Only needs a simple majority to pass this and get stamped by the chairman though.

8
Sphinx3peat 8 points ago +8 / -0

No, it doesn’t.

The US Constitution already explicitly details the requirements to run for the Presidency and the restrictions which prohibit someone from doing so.

Congress can’t do shit to change that.

4
ProphetOfKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

What I’m saying is they’ll pass it and SCOTUS will continue to wipe their ass with the constitution.

1
TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

An insurrection?

9
BS4thewin 9 points ago +9 / -0

The democrats and rino's should be scared. Their time is short.

5
StartAgain 5 points ago +5 / -0

part of me has this gut feeling despite all that's been happening

5
BS4thewin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trust your gut. Read President Trumps letter following the acquittal. It ain't over. MAGA & KAG

1
ItsFunToSay-M-A-G-A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never give up, never surrender!

MAGA FOREVER!!!!

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

1
BS4thewin 1 point ago +1 / -0

YUP!

8
JustHereForTheSalmon 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bonus point for extra almond activation:

If Trump truly lost the election to a guy who got the most votes in history, why are they so so worried about him running again?

6
Mary911 6 points ago +6 / -0

Worst for them, they couldn't make any money. BEST for us, We did.

6
NoTimeToBleed 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do they realize the more they attack him, the more powerful he is?

Let's remember who they installed as president: Joe Biden. A man who would lose a cognitive skills test to a late second term Ronald Reagan. He is already wrecking this country and will not finish his term. Who's up next? Kamala "kneepads" Harris who ended her primary run at 3.5% before she dropped out in 2019. She will not suddenly become less repulsive, but she will also not step aside to anyone in her party who does stand an actual chance.

Trump is a lock for 2024 if he wants it.

3
mikethemarine 3 points ago +3 / -0

may the force be with him

6
Block_Helen 6 points ago +6 / -0

They wouldn't be doing this if they weren't scared to death of him.

5
Philhelm 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump still is the President de jure.

5
swab_my_ass_china 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why isn't anyone going after impeachment on kamala and pelosi and all the others on VIDEO inciting, Get in there man, get them running around in defense for once, time to be on the OFFENSE

4
Emhunt_77 4 points ago +4 / -0

These effects are going down! Trump is the best President ever snd you all are the worst representatives of the American people! The American people as a whole do not support any of you!

3
TakenusernameA 3 points ago +3 / -0

The represent China pretty well though.

4
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 4 points ago +4 / -0

He won in 2020, by a lot. We have an illegitimate government.

4
ArtistWarrior 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's talk about the traitors using the 14th Amendment to forbid POTUS Trump from holding office.

I haven't read it, don't know what it is.

Now I do: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/schumer-leaves-door-open-to-14th-amendment-measure-to-bar-trump-from-office/ar-BB1dBLum?ocid=uxbndlbing

1
Women4Trump2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

Do you think the Dems will try to invoke the 14th? Ugh I hope not.

2
ArtistWarrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Think of the absolute craziest worst most destructive thing they could do.

The 14th.

It's guaranteed.

4
Trumpdidit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why is it, only one party has law's, rules, or agenda's, to carry out against citizens, polititians, or appointed people, but Republicans don't hold or have the same courtesy rights or avenues to use against those who attempt to destroy our republic.? Asking for a friend.

2
mikethemarine 2 points ago +2 / -0

cause dems and chicomms own the media, and dumb asses believe what they say

4
BasedChase45 4 points ago +4 / -0

These are the same people who claim everything is "dangerous to our democracy". Then they turn around and try to ban someone from running for no reason.

4
Truglow 4 points ago +4 / -0

This BS has gone to far. We will lose this country if we cant weed out these corrupt politicians and social media fags.

1
mikethemarine 1 point ago +1 / -0

they didn't have a insurrection before, but they keep dividing use, who knows?

3
the_sky_is_falling 3 points ago +3 / -0

I believe they are going with trying to pin criminal charges upon him and if they succeed in declaring him guilty, they can say that as a convicted criminal, he isn't allowed to run for President.

3
mikethemarine 3 points ago +3 / -0

not in the constitution

1
the_sky_is_falling 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly but at this point, like they care

2
mikethemarine 2 points ago +2 / -0

and that's why most of us are pissed,

3
romanhelmet 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm offering this pro tip to the Democrats about the laws of nature.

You simply can not:

  • compress liquid

  • fit 10 pounds of shit into a 5 pound bag

  • put a square peg into a round hole

  • Impeach Trump

2
StrongIsland 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can’t tell you how much this resonates with me, 20 years ago I worked in a photo lab, the amount of people (grown adults) I had to explain to that you cannot turn a rectangle photograph into a square without cropping is unreal!!! This is a basic skill/rule learned in kindergarten.... and this was 20 years ago 😞 people are dumb

3
dnewlander 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bill of Attainder, anyone? Why not? They're not even pretending anymore.

They're scared shitless.

3
COanon 3 points ago +3 / -0

What would America look like or be by 2024? I hate to think about what Buydin would do to this country and its Patriotic citizens.

1
mikethemarine 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump might be just like Lincoln, in charge during a civil conflict

3
PonySoldier66 3 points ago +3 / -0

ahem .

Speaker of the House 2022

Under Constitutional law, it is not explicitly stated that the Speaker be required to already be a member of the House of Representatives. However, history has proven that each Speaker elected has been a member, thus setting a precedent for subsequent elections that have not been codified into law. Members of the House will typically vote for the nominee for their respective party, but their vote can be placed for any of the nominees to be considered.

A majority vote is required by the Constitution’s provisions, however, less than a majority vote can be needed to elect a new Speaker because of absentee Members of the House placing a vote as “present.” If there is no candidate receiving a majority vote, the election process will be repeated until a Speaker is elected.

2
kensai 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is after they successfully cheated. So imagine what they have planned for us in the next four years if they are worried he will win in 2024 so they must prevent him from running. Makes you think.

2
BoughtByBloomberg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

There shall be no test for office. See the constitution. Enjoy.

2
maga9999 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unconstitutional Bill of Attainder.

2
Latinalover 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have news. Trump is,still the president and he will run again in 2024 and win.

2
goldkeyboardwarrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftists will claim that they have to disqualify him because stupid Trumpers will still vote for him anyway and may even cheat to win.

The whole point of this shampeachment wasn't to remove him, because they were pretty sure that they wouldn't get 67 votes and they backed down on witnesses when Graham threatened to call Pelosi. The goal was to get all of the talking heads to tell the country that 43 Republicans didn't vote to remove the guy they claim led an insurrection and they all must be voted out.

This thing they are going to try and do with the 14th Amendment to try and disqualify him from in 2024 is unlikely to be successful.

2
EpicTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

It needs to be fought back against BIGLY! We have the power to choose our candidates. Washington swampers do not have the right to tell us who we can and can’t support. President Trump is OUR CHOICE! If he chooses to run, he will win again. If he chooses to rebuild a party by endorsing MAGA candidates, that’s good too. We know who the backstabbed are now. We need to replace them all!

2
0815 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do they think the next "elections" will be in 2024?

2
RiMjObZ4dAyZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

"the court held that a congressional statute that bars particular individuals from government employment qualifies as punishment prohibited by the bill of attainder clause."

2
rentfREEEE_since2016 2 points ago +2 / -0

Post gab links to drive traffic to the site.