167 () posted 59 days ago by Route1776 59 days ago by Route1776 +169 / -2 14 comments share 14 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (14) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 13 ▼ – MostEffectualTopKek 13 points 59 days ago +13 / -0 That was epic. He knew the angle she was trying to take and shower it right back up the place where here journalistic integrity is. permalink save report block reply ▲ 12 ▼ – KajensAngel 12 points 59 days ago +12 / -0 This is how you speak the media. This is the way. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Return_Of_The_LAMFF 3 points 59 days ago +3 / -0 No, the way to speak to the media is at the end of a rope. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 10 ▼ – SwampGirlAZ 10 points 59 days ago +10 / -0 Iām in love!š permalink save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – flounder69 9 points 59 days ago +9 / -0 Anyone else feel like standing up and applauding this man. permalink save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – flounder69 7 points 59 days ago +7 / -0 And if they are capable of fraudulently altering a tweet you think they wouldn't rig an election. How can a person stand tall and align themselves with that scum? permalink save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – nra1ifer 7 points 59 days ago +7 / -0 Priceless! Mr. Van der Veen is a straight shooter and doesn't take any CRAP from a media-babe (not) talking-head spewer of MSM BS. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – Salty888 4 points 59 days ago +4 / -0 Take a bow Mr Van der Veen. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – mdave88 4 points 59 days ago +4 / -0 Do not link twitter, please. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 58 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – grassshrimp 3 points 59 days ago +3 / -0 Great interview, he expressed what most of us believe. Only thing I disagreed with was his view on PBS. They are biased left bigly. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Gnometard 3 points 59 days ago +3 / -0 He's probably referring to the past where they were a little more objective. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – FuckReddit4545 3 points 59 days ago +3 / -0 Caught red handed altering evidence, but they would never rig an election... permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Mercapto13uu 2 points 59 days ago +2 / -0 when i have more money, he'll be my lawyer for everything. permalink save report block reply
That was epic. He knew the angle she was trying to take and shower it right back up the place where here journalistic integrity is.
This is how you speak the media. This is the way.
No, the way to speak to the media is at the end of a rope.
Iām in love!š
Anyone else feel like standing up and applauding this man.
And if they are capable of fraudulently altering a tweet you think they wouldn't rig an election. How can a person stand tall and align themselves with that scum?
Priceless! Mr. Van der Veen is a straight shooter and doesn't take any CRAP from a media-babe (not) talking-head spewer of MSM BS.
Take a bow Mr Van der Veen.
Do not link twitter, please.
Great interview, he expressed what most of us believe. Only thing I disagreed with was his view on PBS. They are biased left bigly.
He's probably referring to the past where they were a little more objective.
Caught red handed altering evidence, but they would never rig an election...
when i have more money, he'll be my lawyer for everything.