2175
Comments (66)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
SLxTnT 0 points ago +2 / -2

Limitations with the live data. All percentages are rounded to 0.1%.

Let's say there's 10000 votes. 50.6% for Biden and 49.4% for Trump. Add 1 vote for Trump to make it 5060-4941. The percentages are still 50.6% (50.595%) and 49.4% (49.405%) when rounded.

10001*50.6%=5060.506

10001*49.4%=4940.494

We now have a fractional vote that appears in the live data with Biden gaining more of the vote than Trump. If this was enough to cause the rounding to increase, we'd see an increase of 0.1% of the total vote to Trump and 0.1% decrease for Biden. That's why it looks like there's increases in a specific multiple (0.1% of total) when you take all the rounding errors and put them in a row.

When looking at the live data, you have to remove any possible rounding errors. That can remove some fraud, but it can't be proven. I believe someone on here did that months ago and still found many unexplainable instances.>

9
j4ckp0t 9 points ago +9 / -0

As someone who works with large sets of data, this is retarded.

1
SLxTnT 1 point ago +2 / -1

Retarded in what way? That it's rounded or the explanation that it's rounded?

4
Mitschu 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yes.

I have 2 cakes. I cut both perfectly in half. I now have 40.5 cakes. I round, and now I've got 4 cakes. I cut all four of them perfectly in half. I now have 80.5 cakes. I round, and now I've got 8 cakes. I round again, and now I've got 10 cakes. I cut them all perfectly in half...

That is what happens when you don't have meaningful significant digits when rounding, and that's why any mathematician, statistician, or retard with a second grade education knows better.

Bullshit. They knew damn well what they were doing when they lied, and nobody buys it, anymore than anybody wants to buy all 1 trillion of my freshly carved cakes.