3409
Comments (155)
sorted by:
225
badbeachboy 225 points ago +225 / -0

the first tell is that there are decimal points. One vote should equal 1, not a percentage...

83
honk_hogan 83 points ago +83 / -0

lol you would think, but in clown world 2+2=5

51
JackIsALarp 51 points ago +51 / -0

No, 2+2 = 2(1/3) + 2(1/3) = 0.667 + 0.667 = 1.33333666666667

Honk^2

35
ICantREEEE 35 points ago +35 / -0

Honk to the honk power

15
Skogin 15 points ago +15 / -0

Honk^Honk

10
BunkerHill 10 points ago +10 / -0

Honk to the power of honk

9
Whoopies_tds 9 points ago +9 / -0

What up my Honky

4
plebJookt 4 points ago +4 / -0

What you honkies on about?

3
HaitchElGee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Infinihonk!

3
BunkerHill 3 points ago +3 / -0

Honk to the Nth power.

6
CrankHandler1991 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm gonna tell my kids this is common core math

14
human_centipede 14 points ago +14 / -0

butt butt but that's true for large values of 2!, shitlord!

16
Granny 16 points ago +18 / -2

No Pede,

.659 + .322 + .19 = 1 vote.

This math shows the percentages of votes that were allocated to each candidate. I hope that's clear?

Edit: for our autists, there's another problem here. Notice how some of the "other vote" values are negative, (by a lot)? Isn't anybody asking, how can a vote total value be negative?

6
BoughtByBloomberg2 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean 0.019 but also how is 1 vote allocated to multiple people?

11
VolareVia 11 points ago +12 / -1

'Ranked choice voting' is a real thing in some countries, or at least it's been suggested in some countries. It would mean that this person had Biden as their first choice for president, and Trump as their second choice. That's not how voting in the US works though, obviously.

14
BoughtByBloomberg2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Sure but ranked choice voting wouldn't work this way either. Ranked choice voting would look at whether or not the front runner had a plurality and then if they didn't would kick in to count the second choice candidate of the candidate that received the lowest number of first choice votes.

It's an absolute trash system that is designed to enable mob rule.

9
VolareVia 9 points ago +9 / -0

Agreed. This is Dominion we're talking about here. What I'm suggesting is consistent with the Antrim County audit report. To me, that's the most likely way they decided to implement ranked choice voting.

That's how you might count ranked choice if you were okay with having to count the votes again to ensure the second choice gets the vote of any given person. Decimal votes would do the same thing without having to count twice.

Regardless, RCV was obviously one of the ways they used to steal this, per the Antrim County report. That way the could add a bit to Biden's vote total even for the people who didn't have their ballot adjudicated for Biden. This because not all of the people who might end up adjudicating ballots would necessarily be Dems, even though that's what ended up happening with the Rs getting shut out.

3
Granny 3 points ago +3 / -0

And yes that shifted decimal point is curious. Doesn't seem consistent with the rest of the data. I haven't really analyzed it, but it seems like the algorithm was not consistent in the way it calculated "other votes". I noticed that some of the "other votes" values are negative.

Edit: transposition error?

2
Granny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Algorithm.

2
WacoKid90 2 points ago +2 / -0

It eas supposed to be .1 to the big guy

2
cctw 2 points ago +2 / -0

2 + 2 = 2.36 Biden votes, 1.364 Trump vote

1
Forgototherpassword 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need a vaccine every quarter, so 5 shots a year. - Big Pharma

1
RailroadWildflower 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this is allowed to stand, we’ll know we’re truly living in Oceania under the rule of INGSOC.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
7
bigdickhangsright 7 points ago +7 / -0

There you go helping leftists sleep easy.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
skatestraight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Unplanned donation of votes. The other guy needed it more

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
BunkerHill 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fortified voting

8
CmonPeopleGetReal 8 points ago +8 / -0

exactly, why the fuck are they even using floats, vote counting is integer based, it's much easier for the computer system to process integers than it is to process floats anyway, so there is no reason to code a vote counting system using floats aside from the very final calculation of deciding percentages at the very end.

6
sentient-potato 6 points ago +6 / -0

That alone should have triggered investigations.

4
Observer95 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why can people not sue based on this fact alone?

-1
GlockArm -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why couldn't the people in the gulag just sue Stalin?

112
Choomguy 112 points ago +112 / -0

This is the fractional voting we’ve been warned about for years.

59
Eatinglue 59 points ago +59 / -0

Trump voters only count as 3/5ths of a person!

37
rentfREEEE_since2016 37 points ago +37 / -0

Trump = first black president

5
Logan_Viking 5 points ago +5 / -0

Top Kek!

7
Pegstar69 7 points ago +7 / -0

Excellent comment.

4
Mary911 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's the price we pay for being deplorable. Hillary made us Less of a person.

43
mfinlay04 43 points ago +45 / -2

Math is racist, you xenophobic bigot.

38
bob2112 38 points ago +38 / -0

It works!!

32
Jokeruh1n 32 points ago +33 / -1

Nothing to see here. Look at this riot impeachment trial and the COVID check.

30
IcyHue 30 points ago +30 / -0

Negative "other votes"? Wot?

And are these official numbers?

27
Hamadryad 27 points ago +27 / -0

Anyone have the source to this data that we can look at and review?

16
4
somethinga9230k 4 points ago +5 / -1

Isn't that page about something with IP addresses and the like?

11
myredditnameisfake [S] 11 points ago +12 / -1

Read the last sentence

6
progressives4Trump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nah, we want a link to the official data reported by the precinct

2
rootGoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

...and Lindell got it from...

Mike is the reporter; no matter how honest he is, we still want the sauce.

22
GOPkilledTHEMSELVES 22 points ago +26 / -4

Lol ok racist

18
BidensHairyLega 18 points ago +18 / -0

Math is a violation of the new Joe Crow laws.

15
WeWillRejoice 15 points ago +15 / -0

If shown to a "skeptic," what would/could they say to refute this?

32
Niqlndym 32 points ago +32 / -0

This chart could have been created by “working backwards” from the election results: If you look at the final vote tally, it represents a ratio - In this case, that could have been that Biden got 65.9% of the votes, Trump received 32.2%, and the 3rd Party candidates got 1.9%. That totals 100%

Then, if you build a chart, which shows the votes flowing in (without knowing who actually received each vote), you could total up the count fractionally, and arrive at the actual election results.

This is a perfect argument, which emphasizes that the source of this data is extremely important.

11
Gatsby2x4 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thats a great analysis, except for the 1 vote being split. Someone should have had 100% vs 0

5
Granny 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also how does it make any sense, to create a record with an accurate bottom line, but the rest of the data is useless fiction?

Edit: I think I might answer my own question, if I'm correct - the bottom line is also fiction.

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

The 1 vote being split is key to the rest.

4
Granny 4 points ago +4 / -0

Haha ya, it's the "Rosetta stone" of election fraud.

1
Chosimbaone 1 point ago +1 / -0

well 1.0 vs Zero. Gotta keep those decimals

6
Keeneix 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thank you for that. So where did this information come from. Was it made by working backwards, was it part of the voting tally and if it was part of the voting tally is it based off the end result and in effect worked backwards by electronic means.

Seriously on face value this seems iron clad but after a moments thought it seems flimsy at best with out more context.

1
leakmouth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where is this chart from?

5
TehAgent 5 points ago +5 / -0

3rd Party candidates got 1.9%

Off topic, but in my state the 3rd Party got 12.9%. Thats outstanding. I even voted liberterian in the gubb'ner race despite not really liking many Liberterians these days. Jo Jorgenson for instance was a shit candidate that just took shit Democrat policies and added 'we like guns' to the end.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's not a perfect argument. That's complete denial of reality.

Exactly what Marxists have to do.

5
Niqlndym 5 points ago +5 / -0

Huh? Sounds like you’re the one denying reality. Point being, this chart is worthless, unless it can be shown that it was collected in real-time, before the results were know.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not the way reality works.

You have yet to explain how 1 vote is something other than 1 vote.

Neither have you bothered to investigate the source.

-2
GlockArm -2 points ago +1 / -3

"That's not a perfect argument. That's complete denial of reality."

You didn't make an argument or a point.

Just like leftists. You're a fuckboy.

27
x79q3pb 27 points ago +27 / -0

Sceptics and believers alike should be asking for the source data and not just referring to a random table of data, in order to verify it for themselves.

5
Moriartis 5 points ago +5 / -0

So much this. I'm a Data Scientist by trade and I would LOVE to get ahold of some damn source data, but all I keep seeing are claims and snapshots of data in videos.

7
IvIA6A 7 points ago +7 / -0

"This isn't real. Why would they show votes as decimal and percentages?" Probably

They'd attack the presentation and source without realizing that's the fucking point.

3
Pumpitrealgood 3 points ago +3 / -0

it is real, when you add a filter code into the tabulation machines for every Trump vote, say .75, and every biden vote 1.2, that is a huge swing, and that is how you end up with these weird % , odd numbers.

4
befehlistbefehl 4 points ago +5 / -1

"Racist Trumpite!"

4
Fishdicks_ 4 points ago +5 / -1

Orange man bad

14
invalid_data 14 points ago +14 / -0

Soo many people would rather live in their blissful ignorance then sit down and realize that the government is corrupt and staged a massive coup to throw out the president and steal the senate. The TIME admitted there was top level conspiracy but people don't want to believe there was a massive election conspiracy to rig the election.

14
ShartMaster 14 points ago +15 / -1

He did the monster math.

15
Everquest4Life 15 points ago +15 / -0

It kind of was a graveyard smash with all the dead people voting.

8
Truglow 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just sit down shut up and shut down and take this payoff check you wont get.

8
Super_Dave 8 points ago +8 / -0

"It was a typo.. human error"

--Dems/MSM, if this gets any coverage

9
zeeshopper 9 points ago +9 / -0

They doctored the evidence pieces they presented during the impeachment.

Hmmm... What else would they be capable of altering?

3
Gadsden 3 points ago +3 / -0

And weren't even ashamed of it.

7
dukeofdoorcounty 7 points ago +7 / -0

One person, 0.659 votes. The American way

2
Granny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, one person split their vote 3 ways 🤔

0
Singingthebattlecry 0 points ago +1 / -1

It was a slave vote, 3/5ths =.6

7
Gadsden 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can we get 2016 vote counts to see if any small districts had the same issue?

Im curious to see if 2016 was rigged as well, but the dems just weren't prepared.

9
myredditnameisfake [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

You know it was.

2
Gadsden 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do. I'd like others to know, as well.

In fact, there's so much overwhelming proof of fraud in 2020, my opinion of others is rapidly dropping in correlation with their unwillingness to see the truth.

2
HebsFarm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has anyone trained a parrot to say "Baseless claims! Baseless claims!"... internet gold, that would be.

6
fthecoup 6 points ago +6 / -0

Banana Republic.

6
CanadianTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

All this could have been avoided if the first person who suggested using decimal points to count votes was shot.

5
Ligersrule1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is this the 3/5ths compromise?

/s

5
CuomoisaMassMurderer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Look at us. We're slaves now.

5
17pat76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rigged and stolen election. The 🐐 won in a landslide

5
dakin116 5 points ago +5 / -0

Basically using the public’s ignorance about technology, sounds like Big Tech. This isn’t even sophisticated

5
CapitalP 5 points ago +5 / -0

domestic terrorist common core math

5
uHateUsCuz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Image not loading for some reason :/

3
myredditnameisfake [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

maga.host is down

5
Lazysleeper3 5 points ago +5 / -0

We just need to keep spreading this evidence nonstop for how ever long it takes to get something done. They have to try to refute the evidence at some point. This all has to go to court at some point. At some point they will have to look at it. They can't deny the evidence.

5
BoughtByBloomberg2 5 points ago +5 / -0

It doesn't amaze me how sloppy they were. They are Democrats. Not very smart. It amazes me Republicans did nothing. Because even for how lazy they are you'd think existing in 20 years would matter to them.

5
CuomoisaMassMurderer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Republicans did everything.

They hate Trump more than Democrats.

1
RPchill1 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the only explanation I can think of. Trump BEGGED local and state officials to secure the 2020 elections FAR in advance. They did nothing. Why? Because mass hysterical TDS.

4
SryServiceDown 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wide and far!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
myredditnameisfake [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

maga.host is down

3
MEME_WIZARD 3 points ago +3 / -0

Image is dead...

2
myredditnameisfake [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes. Maga host is down

1
MEME_WIZARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mega oof...

3
redditadminssuckit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Link didn't work

3
myredditnameisfake [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

maga.host is down

3
Computer000 3 points ago +3 / -0

THIS IS NOT NEW! GO TO EDWARD SOLOMON'S CHANNEL https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIxc8YMkny2KBaD5TQsSbpg HE HAS IT ALL FIGURED OUT WITH RATIO SWITCHING

3
ViagraFalls 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have a government by the elites and for the elites. It's been like that a long time. Trump was a wrench in the engine at best.

3
FactsBeforeOpinions 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone have a link to download this document presented by Mary Fanning/Mike Lindell?

3
hillaryforprison 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, congress doesn't want to investigate this, because it's too factual? Our government sucks and should be erased. They make millions and take from our pockets, then only strive to make the country worse.

3
Dieselslacker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Two rows down had25 votes and other votes has a half a vote

3
ParticleCannon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, math is racist, so...

That's gonna be a deboonk from me, dawg

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is the source of the data? I have heard Lindel never reveals where this data is from. This is important if you want it to be considered proof.

2
antho_2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why does it even have decimals?

2
bitcoiner 2 points ago +2 / -0

upvote for gab

2
42rle 2 points ago +2 / -0

this was all brought to light by black box voting back in 2016. Nobody listened and they ran Bev off the net

2
TheCanadianPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any other sources - this one got taken down? We need to store everything they are trying to erase on a server that wont cave...

2
Lady_MaGa 2 points ago +2 / -0

.

2
Observer95 2 points ago +2 / -0

1 person = 1 vote was taken away is what Dr. Shiva has been saying from the beginning. This is the case that will wake people up.

This is the reason why that county in Georgia could never get the same results whenever they feed ballots into the machine.

2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

We did the math months ago.

2
Reaction_freckle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn’t get to watch the movie yet. What state is this ?

3
zeeshopper 3 points ago +3 / -0

KKKalifornia

1
Omnes_Omnibus 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the source for this data by the way? Is it official vote data? Can we independently download it?

2
myredditnameisfake [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It tells you the source. You just have to read it

1
Omnes_Omnibus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks.

1
Kinger06 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct me if Im wrong. It looks like 4 machine counts were messed with. 5 counting the 1 vote but I am assuming that is a test count to make sure they are getting the proper percentage spread they want. Correct?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quote mining, just like a leftist.

Learn how to read

1
progressives4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't even find this tweet

1
Les_Deplorables 1 point ago +1 / -0

HONK²

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0