This chart could have been created by “working backwards” from the election results: If you look at the final vote tally, it represents a ratio - In this case, that could have been that Biden got 65.9% of the votes, Trump received 32.2%, and the 3rd Party candidates got 1.9%. That totals 100%
Then, if you build a chart, which shows the votes flowing in (without knowing who actually received each vote), you could total up the count fractionally, and arrive at the actual election results.
This is a perfect argument, which emphasizes that the source of this data is extremely important.
Thank you for that. So where did this information come from. Was it made by working backwards, was it part of the voting tally and if it was part of the voting tally is it based off the end result and in effect worked backwards by electronic means.
Seriously on face value this seems iron clad but after a moments thought it seems flimsy at best with out more context.
If shown to a "skeptic," what would/could they say to refute this?
This chart could have been created by “working backwards” from the election results: If you look at the final vote tally, it represents a ratio - In this case, that could have been that Biden got 65.9% of the votes, Trump received 32.2%, and the 3rd Party candidates got 1.9%. That totals 100%
Then, if you build a chart, which shows the votes flowing in (without knowing who actually received each vote), you could total up the count fractionally, and arrive at the actual election results.
This is a perfect argument, which emphasizes that the source of this data is extremely important.
Thank you for that. So where did this information come from. Was it made by working backwards, was it part of the voting tally and if it was part of the voting tally is it based off the end result and in effect worked backwards by electronic means.
Seriously on face value this seems iron clad but after a moments thought it seems flimsy at best with out more context.