He does. Right there. I'm not serving his god, so I'm serving Satan, according to him. No? He wants a Christian economy. That excludes me. No? America is a Christian nation, so I can't be a part of it and am in fact part of the destruction of it, being not Christian. No? I'm not Christian and so I'm not to be tolerated. No?
There's nothing to explain. Your conclusions are off the rails!
Nowhere does he say you're "not to be tolerated, not part of the Country, can't be talked to," or whatever other shenanigans you contrive.
His statement is very straightforward. The early Church survived by preferring other Christians. He says he'll try that. If you look at the hell he's been through, it's understandable. Where possible, he'll do business with specifically Christian owned businesses. Where it's not possible, he'll do without until he can't. There is no perfect solution.
If you owned your own company, he would prefer a competitor, yes. That doesn't result in any of your conclusions.
Also, I see no evidence that he's thought through the difference between a theocracy and the form of government originally created here. He may struggle with that. That's ok. US will never be a theocracy.
He did not say what you accused him of saying.
Try honesty.
He does. Right there. I'm not serving his god, so I'm serving Satan, according to him. No? He wants a Christian economy. That excludes me. No? America is a Christian nation, so I can't be a part of it and am in fact part of the destruction of it, being not Christian. No? I'm not Christian and so I'm not to be tolerated. No?
No.
You have this wrong.
Repeatedly.
Try reading what he actually says. Not making up nonsense like a damned fool.
Explain it to me, because apparently I'm too much of a brainlet to understand what's looking like very basic english to me.
That is not the false set of conclusions you drew.
Not a word of it.
How much meth are you on?
You have not quoted your conclusions, which are unhinged
Again, just stick with what the man actually said.
There's nothing to explain. Your conclusions are off the rails!
Nowhere does he say you're "not to be tolerated, not part of the Country, can't be talked to," or whatever other shenanigans you contrive.
His statement is very straightforward. The early Church survived by preferring other Christians. He says he'll try that. If you look at the hell he's been through, it's understandable. Where possible, he'll do business with specifically Christian owned businesses. Where it's not possible, he'll do without until he can't. There is no perfect solution.
If you owned your own company, he would prefer a competitor, yes. That doesn't result in any of your conclusions.
Also, I see no evidence that he's thought through the difference between a theocracy and the form of government originally created here. He may struggle with that. That's ok. US will never be a theocracy.