He does. Right there. I'm not serving his god, so I'm serving Satan, according to him. No? He wants a Christian economy. That excludes me. No? America is a Christian nation, so I can't be a part of it and am in fact part of the destruction of it, being not Christian. No? I'm not Christian and so I'm not to be tolerated. No?
Explain where my reasoning with any of it is wrong. I have quotes, and basic logic. I don't serve his god, and therefore I serve Satan, directly according to him. Explain how I'm supposed to draw any other conclusion.
There's nothing to explain. Your conclusions are off the rails!
Nowhere does he say you're "not to be tolerated, not part of the Country, can't be talked to," or whatever other shenanigans you contrive.
His statement is very straightforward. The early Church survived by preferring other Christians. He says he'll try that. If you look at the hell he's been through, it's understandable. Where possible, he'll do business with specifically Christian owned businesses. Where it's not possible, he'll do without until he can't. There is no perfect solution.
If you owned your own company, he would prefer a competitor, yes. That doesn't result in any of your conclusions.
Also, I see no evidence that he's thought through the difference between a theocracy and the form of government originally created here. He may struggle with that. That's ok. US will never be a theocracy.
Yes, he actually does say all that. I've quoted him directly. I know the Bible's supposed to be all parables and shit to not be taken literally, but this isn't the Bible. You provide me with some actual quotes.
He does. Right there. I'm not serving his god, so I'm serving Satan, according to him. No? He wants a Christian economy. That excludes me. No? America is a Christian nation, so I can't be a part of it and am in fact part of the destruction of it, being not Christian. No? I'm not Christian and so I'm not to be tolerated. No?
No.
You have this wrong.
Repeatedly.
Try reading what he actually says. Not making up nonsense like a damned fool.
Explain it to me, because apparently I'm too much of a brainlet to understand what's looking like very basic english to me.
That is not the false set of conclusions you drew.
Explain where my reasoning with any of it is wrong. I have quotes, and basic logic. I don't serve his god, and therefore I serve Satan, directly according to him. Explain how I'm supposed to draw any other conclusion.
Not a word of it.
How much meth are you on?
I've fucking quoted it. Directly. Are my quotes wrong?
You have not quoted your conclusions, which are unhinged
Again, just stick with what the man actually said.
There is no room for interpretation on "If they are not serving God, they are serving Satan".
There's nothing to explain. Your conclusions are off the rails!
Nowhere does he say you're "not to be tolerated, not part of the Country, can't be talked to," or whatever other shenanigans you contrive.
His statement is very straightforward. The early Church survived by preferring other Christians. He says he'll try that. If you look at the hell he's been through, it's understandable. Where possible, he'll do business with specifically Christian owned businesses. Where it's not possible, he'll do without until he can't. There is no perfect solution.
If you owned your own company, he would prefer a competitor, yes. That doesn't result in any of your conclusions.
Also, I see no evidence that he's thought through the difference between a theocracy and the form of government originally created here. He may struggle with that. That's ok. US will never be a theocracy.
Yes, he actually does say all that. I've quoted him directly. I know the Bible's supposed to be all parables and shit to not be taken literally, but this isn't the Bible. You provide me with some actual quotes.