4867
Comments (427)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
68
Kramercalled 68 points ago +68 / -0

She's so smug, ending the interview acting like he went off the rails for no reason when she knows he's right & her question was intended to frame the doctored evidence as insignificant.

Also what's this we breeze by -

There's more stuff that we uncovered that they doctored, to be frank with you. Perhaps that will come out one day.

5
Mitschu 5 points ago +6 / -1

To be honest, that's a red flag for me. A "politics before country" statement couched as "not being a sore winner."

We the American people have the right to know. To hold back damning evidence because you've already won the case is good politics, don't get me wrong. But that's what it is: just politics. Playing the rigged game and scoring a few easy points.

He doesn't really have the RIGHT to sit on that discovered information, any more than I have the right to keep secret that butchered cadaver I found in the perp's car because the criminal already freely confessed he was driving while intoxicated.

Or put simply: Michael, burn the whole fucking establishment down with their dirty laundry. BE A SORE WINNER, because we're certainly not tired of winning yet.