365
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
BEBOLDlikeTheLION [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

There is nothing comparable to spotify? I don't want to search 1.download at a time like I'm back in the 90's LMFAO.

I will do without music before that..

11
wethedownvoted 11 points ago +11 / -0

the music industry, like all corporations, failed miserably to adapt to the internet.

that's why we have brand new companies like amazon who's product is apparently "all online retailing" because other companies were crippled by static unions and overly large boards preventing them from reacting quickly

the music industry, whose first instinct is always to ban new technology, failed 3x as much as other industries, and wound up losing their entire distribution chain -- literally stolen from them repeatedly by limewire, napster, the pirate bay, apple, amazon (of course), and finally spotify.

they're somewhat ok with the spotify arrangement because they're finally making money again so there isn't going to be something else for a long time

6
PKShadilay 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not a bug. It's a feature. They want monopolies over everything we consume.

6
Pierre_Delectoes 6 points ago +6 / -0

There are no streaming services that are not communist. Spotify, Apple, Google, Tidal, Amazon are all run by marxists. There are some other entrants like Deezer and qobuz, but I would bet big money they are also run by marxists and just haven't been around long enough to have shown their colors.

But, setting that aside, the music you want to consume is written, performed, and distributed by marxist artists and recording studios, so supporting even a based streaming service is supporting marxists. If you want music, pirate it. Otherwise buy some copies of music performed by proven-non-marxists.

2
FutureFreemason 2 points ago +2 / -0

wow epic good work soldier